The assassination of Julius Caesar was the result of a conspiracy by about 60 Roman senators who called themselves Liberators.
Led by Cassio and Marco Bruto, they stabbed Giulio Cesare to death in a location adjacent to the Teatro di Pompeo on the Ides of March (March 15), 44 BC. ]
Caesar was the dictator of the Roman Republic at the time, having recently been declared dictator perpetuo by the Senate.
This declaration made several senators fear that Caesar wanted to overthrow the Senate in favour of tyranny.
The ramifications of the assassination led to the Liberators' civil war and, ultimately, to the Principate period of the Roman Empire.
Contents |
These events were the principal motive for Caesar's assassination.
The Senate named Caesar dictator perpetuo ("dictator in perpetuity").
Roman mints produced a denarius coin with this title and his profile on one side, and with an image of the goddess Ceres and Caesar's title of Augur Pontifex Maximus on the reverse.
While minting the title of "dictator" was NOT controversial, Caesar's image was, as it was unusual to feature living consuls and other public officials on coins during the Republic.
According to Cassio Dio, a senatorial delegation went to inform Caesar of new honours they had bestowed upon him in 44 BC.
Caesar received them while SITTING in the Temple of Venus Genetrix, rather than rising to meet them.
Suetonio wrote that Caesar failed to rise in the temple, either because he was restrained by Cornelius Balbus or that he balked at the suggestion he should rise.
Suetonius also gave the account of a crowd assembled to greet Caesar upon his return to Rome.
A member of the crowd placed a laurel wreath on the statue of Caesar on the Rostra.
The tribunes Gaius Epidius Marcellus and Lucius Caesetius Flavus ordered that the wreath be removed as it was a symbol of Jupiter and royalty.
Caesar had the tribunes removed from office through his official powers.
According to Suetonius, he was unable to dissociate himself from the royal title from this point forward.
Suetonius also gives the story that a crowd shouted to him rex ("king"), to which Caesar replied, "I am Caesar, not Rex".[5]
Also, at the festival of the Lupercalia, while he gave a speech from the Rostra, Mark Antony, who had been elected co-consul with Caesar, attempted to place a crown on his head several times.
Caesar put it aside to use as a sacrifice to Jupiter Optimus Maximus.
Plutarch and Suetonius are similar in their depiction of these events, but Dio combines the stories writing that the tribunes arrested the citizens who placed diadems or wreaths on statues of Caesar.
He then places the crowd shouting "rex" on the Alban Hill with the tribunes arresting a member of this crowd as well.
The plebeian protested that he was unable to speak his mind freely.
Caesar then brought the tribunes before the senate and put the matter to a vote, thereafter removing them from office and erasing their names from the records.
Suetonius adds that Lucio Cotta proposed to the Senate that Caesar should be granted the title of "king" for it was prophesied that only a king would conquer Parthia.
Caesar intended to invade Parthia, a task that later gave considerable trouble to Mark Antony during the second triumvirate.
As Caesar came to perceive toward the later stages of his rule a growing need for autonomy, authority, and freedom of action in both an executive and a policy formulating capacity for Rome and its Empire, he came into direct confrontation with the Roman Senate, which saw itself as both the primary and principal policy formulation body of all Rome (in both Italy and the Empire).
Furthermore, members of the Senate believed that the fundamental guarantee of Roman freedom from tyranny, resided in the existence of executive authority only in a corporate, collective body (the Roman Senate), and never in a single individual.
His many titles and honors from the Senate were ultimately merely that, honorary. Caesar continually strove for more power to govern, with as little dependence as possible on honorary titles or Senate.
The placating ennobling of Caesar did not allay ultimate confrontation, as the Senate was still the authority, granting to Caesar his titles.
Formal power resided in them, in tension with Caesar.
Bruto began to conspire against Caesar with his friend and brother-in-law Gaius Cassio Longinus and other men, calling themselves the Liberatores ("Liberators"). Many plans were discussed by the group, as documented by Nicolaus of Damascus:
The conspirators never met exactly openly, but they assembled a few at a time in each other's homes.
There were many discussions and proposals, as might be expected, while they investigated how and where to execute their design.
Some suggested that they should make the attempt along the Sacred Way, which was one of his favorite walks.
Another idea was to do it at the elections, during which he had to cross a bridge to appoint the magistrates in the Campus Martius.
Someone proposed that they draw lots for some to push him from the bridge and others to run up and kill him.
A third plan was to wait for a coming gladiatorial show.
The advantage of that was, because of the show, no suspicion would be aroused if arms were seen.
The majority opinion, however, favored killing him while he sat in the Senate.
He would be there by himself, since only Senators were admitted, and the conspirators could hide their daggers beneath their togas.
This plan won the day.
There were many discussions and proposals, as might be expected, while they investigated how and where to execute their design.
Some suggested that they should make the attempt along the Sacred Way, which was one of his favorite walks.
Another idea was to do it at the elections, during which he had to cross a bridge to appoint the magistrates in the Campus Martius.
Someone proposed that they draw lots for some to push him from the bridge and others to run up and kill him.
A third plan was to wait for a coming gladiatorial show.
The advantage of that was, because of the show, no suspicion would be aroused if arms were seen.
The majority opinion, however, favored killing him while he sat in the Senate.
He would be there by himself, since only Senators were admitted, and the conspirators could hide their daggers beneath their togas.
This plan won the day.
His friends were alarmed at certain rumors and tried to stop him going to the Senate-house, as did his doctors, for he was suffering from one of his occasional dizzy spells.
His wife, Calpurnia, especially, who was frightened by some visions in her dreams, clung to him and said that she would not let him go out that day.
But Marco Bruto, one of the conspirators who was then thought of as a firm friend, came up and said, 'What is this, Caesar? Are you a man to pay attention to a woman's dreams and the idle gossip of stupid men, and to insult the Senate
by not going out, although
it has honoured you and has been specially summoned by you?
But listen to me, cast aside the forebodings
of all these people, and come.
The Senate has been in session waiting for
you since early this morning.
This swayed Caesar and he left.
His wife, Calpurnia, especially, who was frightened by some visions in her dreams, clung to him and said that she would not let him go out that day.
But Marco Bruto, one of the conspirators who was then thought of as a firm friend, came up and said, 'What is this, Caesar? Are you a man to pay attention to a woman's dreams and the idle gossip of stupid men, and to insult the Senate
by not going out, although
it has honoured you and has been specially summoned by you?
But listen to me, cast aside the forebodings
of all these people, and come.
The Senate has been in session waiting for
you since early this morning.
This swayed Caesar and he left.
This forced a timetable onto the conspirators.
Two days before the actual assassination, Cassio met with the conspirators and told them that, should anyone discover the plan, they were to turn their knives on themselves.
His successors did attempt the conquests of Parthia and Germania, but without lasting results.
On the Ides of March (March 15; see Roman calendar) of 44 BC, the
conspirators staged a game of
gladiatorial sport at Pompey's theatre.
The gladiators were provided by Decio Bruto in case their services were needed.
They waited in the great hall of the theatre's quadriportico.
Marc'Antonio, having vaguely learned of the plot the night before from a terrified Liberator named Servilius Casca, and fearing the worst, went to head Caesar off at the steps of the forum.
However, the group of senators intercepted Caesar just as he was passing the Teatro di Pompeo, located in the Campus Marzio (now adjacent to the Largo di Torre Argentina), and directed him to a room adjoining the east portico.
According to Plutarch, as Caesar arrived at the Senate, Tillius Cimber presented him with a petition to recall his exiled brother.
The other conspirators crowded round to offer their support.
Both Plutarch and Suetonius say that Caesar waved him away, but Cimber grabbed Caesar's shoulders and pulled down Caesar's tunic.
Caesar then cried to Cimber, "Why, this is violence!" ("Ista quidem vis est!").
At the same time, Casca produced his
dagger and made a glancing thrust
at the dictator's neck.
Giulio Cesare turned around quickly and caught Casca by the arm.
According to Plutarch, he said in Latin, "Casca, you villain, what are you doing?"
Casca, frightened, shouted
"Help, brother!" in Greek
("ἀδελφέ, βοήθει", "adelphe, boethei").
Within moments, the entire group, including Marco Bruto (played by tenor Babini), was striking out at the dictator.
Caesar attempts to get away, but,
blinded by blood, he trips
and falls.
The men continued stabbing him as he lay defenseless on the lower steps of the portico.
According to Eutropio, around 60 or more men participated in the assassination.
Giulio Cesare was stabbed 23 times.
Suetonius relates that a physician who performed an autopsy on Caesar established that only one wound -- the second one to his chest -- had been fatal.
This autopsy report (the earliest known post-mortem report in history) describes
that Caesar's death was mostly attributable to blood
loss from the multiple stab wounds.
The dictator's last words are a contested subject
among scholars and historians and people alike.
Suetonius reports that others have said
Caesar's last words were the Greek phrase "καὶ σύ, τέκνον"
(transliterated as "Kai su, teknon?": "You too, child?" in English).
However, Suetonio himself says Caesar said nothing.
Plutarch also reports that Caesar said nothing, pulling his toga over his head when he saw Brutus among the conspirators.
The version best known in the English-speaking world is the Latin phrase "Et tu, Brute?" ("You too, Brutus?").
This derives from Shakespeare's Julius Caesar (1599), where it actually forms the first half of a macaronic line: "Et tu, Brute?
Then fall, Caesar."
It has no basis in historical fact, and Shakespeare's use of Latin here is not from any assumption that Caesar would have been using the language, but because the phrase was already popular at the time the play was written.
According to Plutarch, after the assassination, Marco Bruto steps forward as if to say something to his fellow senators not involved in the plot.
They, however, fled the building.
Bruto and his companions then marched to the Capitol while crying out to their beloved city:
"People of Rome, we are once again free!".
They were met with silence,
as the citizens of Rome had locked themselves inside their houses as soon as the rumour of what had taken place had begun to spread.
Caesar's dead body lay where it fell on the Senate floor for nearly
three hours before other officials arrived to remove it.
A wax statue of Caesar was
erected in the Forum displaying the 33 stab wounds.
A crowd who had amassed there started a fire, which
badly damaged neighboring buildings.
In the ensuing years, a series of civil wars resulted with the end of the Republic and the rise of imperial Rome.
Virgil wrote in the Georgics (26 B.C.) that several unusual events took place following Caesar's assassination.
Who dare say the Sun is false?
He and no other warns us when dark uprisings threaten, when treachery and hidden wars are gathering strength.
He and no other was moved to pity Rome on the day that Caesar died, when he veiled his radiance in gloom and darkness, and a godless age feared everlasting night.
Yet in this hour Earth also and the plains of Ocean, ill-boding dogs and birds that spell mischief, sent signs which heralded disaster.
How oft before our eyes did Etna deluge the fields of the Cyclopes with a torrent from her burst furnaces, hurling thereon balls of fire and molten rocks.
Germany heard the noise of battle sweep across the sky and, even without precedent, the Alps rocked with earthquakes.
A voice boomed through the silent groves for all to hear, a deafening voice, and phantoms of unearthly pallor were seen in the falling darkness. Horror beyond words, beasts uttered human speech; rivers stood still, the earth gaped upon; in the temples ivory images wept for grief, and beads of sweat covered bronze statues. King of waterways, the Po swept forests along in the swirl of his frenzied current, carrying with him over the plain cattle and stalls alike. Nor in that same hour did sinister filaments cease to appear in ominous entrails or blood to flow from wells or our hillside towns to echo all night with the howl of wolves. Never fell more lightning from a cloudless sky; never was comet’s alarming glare so often seen.
The result unforeseen by the assassins was that Caesar's death precipitated the end of the Roman Republic.
The Roman lower classes,
with whom Caesar was popular,
became enraged that a small group
of aristocrats -- including Marco Bruto and Cassio -- had sacrificed Giulio Cesare.
Marc'Antony, who had been drifting apart from Caesar, capitalised on the grief of the Roman mob and threatened to unleash them on the Optimates, perhaps with the intent of taking control of Rome himself.
But, to his surprise and chagrin, Caesar had named his grand-nephew Gaio Ottaviano his sole heir, bequeathing him the immensely potent "Cesare"name as well as making him one of the wealthiest citizens in the Republic.
Gaio Ottaviano became the son of the great Caesar, and consequently also inherited the loyalty of much of the Roman populace.
Ottaviano, aged only 18 at the time of Cesare's death, proved to have considerable political skills, and while Marc'Antonio dealt with Decimus Brutus in the first round of the new civil wars, Octavian consolidated his tenuous position.
To combat Bruto and Cassio, who were massing an enormous army in Greece, Antony needed soldiers, the cash from Caesar's war chests, and the legitimacy that Caesar's name would provide for any action he took against them.
With passage of the Lex Titia on November 27, 43 BC,[24] the Second Triumvirate was officially formed, composed of
Marc'Antonio
Octavian, and
Caesar's Master of the Horse Lepidus.
It formally deified Caesar as Divus Iulius in 42 BC, and Caesar Octavian henceforth became Divi filius ("Son of the Divine").
Seeing that Caesar's clemency had resulted in his murder, the Second Triumvirate brought back proscription, abandoned since Sulla.
It engaged in the legally sanctioned murder of a large number of its opponents in order to fund its forty-five legions in the second civil war against Bruto and Cassio.
Marc'Antonio and Ottavio defeated them at Philippi.
Afterward, Marc'Antony married Giulio Cesare's lover, Cleopatra, intending to use the fabulously wealthy Egypt as a base to dominate Rome.
A third civil war broke out between Ottaviano on one hand and Marc'Antonio and Cleopatra on the other.
This final civil war, culminating in Antonio's defeat at Actium, resulted in the final ascendancy of Ottaviano, who became the first Roman emperor, under the name Caesar Augustus, a name that
Some forty people joined in the plot, but about half of their names are lost to history.
The known members are:
- Marco Junius Bruto
- Servius Sulpicius Galba[31]
- Quintus Ligarius[31]
- Lucius Minucius Basilus
- Publius Servilius Casca Longus (brother of Gaius Servilius Casca)
- Gaius Servilius Casca (brother of Publius Servilius Casca Longus and the one responsible for the first stab)
- Decimus Junius Brutus Albinus
- Lucius Tillius Cimber
- Gaius Trebonius[32]
- Lucius Cassius Longinus (brother of Gaius Cassius Longinus)[33]
- Gaius Cassius Parmensis[34]
- Caecilius (brother of Bucolianus)[31]
- Bucolianus (brother of Caecilius)[35]
- Rubrius Ruga[31]
- Marcus Spurius[31]
- Publius Sextius Naso[31]
- Lucius Pontius Aquila[31]
- Petronius[31]
- Decimus Turullius[36]
- Pacuvius Antistius Labeo
He believed that the Liberatores should also have killed Mark Antony.
The conspirators had decided,
however, that the death of a single
tyrant would be more symbolically effective,
claiming that the intent was not a coup d'état,
but tyrannicide.
References
- ^ http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_killed_Julius_Caesar
- ^ Cassius Dio, 44.8.1-2
- ^ Suetonius, Julius 78
- ^ a b Plutarch, Caesar 61
- ^ a b Suetonius, Julius 79.2
- ^ Suetonius, Julius 79.3
- ^ Plutarch, Caesar 58.6
- ^ Fuller, J. F. C. (March 22, 1991). Julius Caesar: man, soldier, and tyrant. Da Capo Press; Reprint edition. pp. 304. ISBN 978-0-306-80422-9.
- ^ "Theatrum Pompei". Oxford University Press. Retrieved 2008-08-28.
- ^ Plutarch - Life of Brutus. The brother was Publius Cimber.
- ^ a b Suetonius, Life of the Caesars, Julius trans. J C Rolfe
- ^ Plutarch, Life of Caesar, chapter 66: "ὁ μεν πληγείς, Ῥωμαιστί· 'Μιαρώτατε Κάσκα, τί ποιεῖς;'"
- ^ Woolf Greg (2006), Et Tu Brute? - The Murder of Caesar and Political Assassination, 199 pages - ISBN 1-86197-741-7
- ^ Suetonius, Julius, c. 82.
- ^ Suetonius, Julius 82.2
- ^ Plutarch, Caesar 66.9
- ^ Stone, Jon R. (2005). The Routledge Dictionary of Latin Quotations. London: Routledge. p. 250. ISBN 0-415-96909-3.
- ^ Morwood, James (1994). The Pocket Oxford Latin Dictionary (Latin-English). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-860283-9.
- ^ It appears, for example, in Richard Eedes's Latin play Caesar Interfectus of 1582 and The True Tragedie of Richarde Duke of Yorke &tc of 1595, Shakespeare's source work for other plays. Dyce, Alexander; (quoting Malone) (1866). The Works of William Shakespeare. London: Chapman and Hall. p. 648.
- ^ Plutarch, Caesar, 67
- ^ Virgil, Georgics, Book 1 [1]
- ^ Florus, Epitome 2.7.1
- ^ Suetonius, Julius 83.2
- ^ Osgood, Josiah (2006). Caesar's Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press. p. 60.
- ^ Suetonius, Augustus 13.1; Florus, Epitome 2.6
- ^ Warrior, Valerie M. (2006). Roman Religion. Cambridge University Press. p. 110. ISBN 0-521-82511-3.
- ^ Florus, Epitome 2.6.3
- ^ Zoch, Paul A. (200). Ancient Rome: An Introductory History. University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 217–218. ISBN 0-8061-3287-6.
- ^ Florus, Epitome 2.7.11-14; Appian, The Civil Wars 5.3
- ^ Florus, Epitome 2.34.66
- ^ a b c d e f g h Appian, Civil Wars II.16.113
- ^ Appian, Civil Wars II.16.117
- ^ Appian, Civil Wars V.1.7
- ^ Velleius Paterculus, II.86.3
- ^ Appian, Civil Wars II.16.113, 117
- ^ Dio, LI.8.2
- ^ Ad Att. XIV 12
[edit] External links
- Account of the assassination from Nicolaus of Damascus
- Suetonius, Life of Julius Caesar, includes an account of the plot
- Account of the assassination from the historian Appian. Section 114 contains a list of conspirators.
No comments:
Post a Comment