Monday, February 10, 2014

The idea for "Prince Igor" as melodrama: V. Stasov

Speranza

   
Vladimir Stasov's portrait by Ilya Repin.


Vladimir Vasilievich Stasov (sometimes transliterated as Stassov; Russian: Влади́мир Васи́льевич Ста́сов; 14 January [O.S. 2 January] 1824, Saint Petersburg – 23 October [O.S. 10 October] 1906, Saint Petersburg),[1] son of Russian architect Vasily Petrovich Stasov (1769–1848), was probably the most respected Russian critic during his lifetime.


Stasov graduated from the School of Jurisprudence in 1843, was admitted to the Imperial Academy of Arts in 1859, and was made honorary fellow of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 1900, together with his friend Leo Tolstoy.

Stasov became a huge figure—and, some critics argue, a tyrant—in mid-19th-century Russian culture.

He discovered a large number of its greatest talents, inspired many of their works and fought their battles in numerous articles and letters to the press.

As such, he carried on a lifelong debate with Russian novelist and playwright Ivan Turgenev, who considered Stasov "our great all-Russian critic.".

He wanted Russian art to liberate itself what he saw as Europe's hold.

By copying the west, he felt, the Russians could be at best second-rate.

However, by borrowing from their own native traditions, they might create a truly national art that could match Europe's with its high artistic standards and originality.

By "national," Stasov felt, art should not only portray people's lives but also be meaningful to them and show them how to live.[3]

In 1847, Stasov published a monograph on Mikhail Glinka's use of folk motifs in his music.

From that time, Stasov advocated Russianness over European influence in music.

In the years which followed Stasov served as an elder advisor to the group of Russian composers known as "The Five".

He also warmed to Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky after hearing the composer play the finale of his Little Russian Symphony at a Christmas 1872 gathering at Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov's home.

Shortly after this gathering, Stasov prompted Tchaikovsky to write a piece based on Shakespeare's The Tempest.[4]

He also drafted a program, inititally for Hector Berlioz, that Tchaikovsky eventually used for his Manfred Symphony.[5]

In between those two works, Stasov suggested an opera based on Alfred de Vigny's historical romance Cinq-Mars.

Tchaikovsky was then intent on writing Eugene Onegin, and Charles Gounod had already written an opera based on Cinq-Mars.[6]

 

Beginning in the 1870s, Stasov ardently supported the realistic painters known as Peredvizhniki as well as Ilya Repin.

 

Vladimir Stasov's grave in the cemetery of Alexander Nevsky Lavra


When artists did not follow his precepts, Stasov could become both intolerant and vocal.

Stasov called the finale of the Little Russian "one of the most important creations of the whole Russian school."

Otherwise, his verdict on Tchaikovsky's work was negative:

"The Conservatoire, academic training, eclecticism and overworking of musical materials laid its dread, destructive hand on him.

Of his total output, a few works [Romeo and Juliet, The Tempest, Francesca da Rimini, and the String Quartets 2 and 3] are first-rate and highly original; the remainder are mediocre or weak."[7]


Nor was he consoling about Modest Mussorgsky, a composer who, as a member of "The Five," he had helped nurture but about whom, for all the public praise of his musical gifts, there was always a note of intellectual condescension.[8]

Founder Mily Balakirev confided to Stasov that he thought Mussorgsky "almost an idiot."[9]

Stasov replied, "I think he is a total idiot."


He was harsher still with the modernist art magazine Mir iskusstva and its founders, Alexandre Benois, Léon Bakst and Sergei Diaghilev when the magazine appeared in 1898.

He called Diaghilev "a decadent cheer-leader" in print and Mir iskusstva "the courtyard of the lepers" (an image borrowed from Victor Hugo's novel Notre-Dame de Paris).

Stasov's correspondence with leading personalities of Russian art life is invaluable.

He is known also for his opposition to music critic and erstwhile friend Alexander Serov concerning the relative merits of Glinka's two operas.

He was so impressed by the literary talent of the Jewish schoolboy Samuil Marshak that he arranged an exception from the Pale of Settlement laws for him and his family.

Stasov's brother, Dmitry Stasov (1828–1918), was a notable advocate who took part in the foundation of the Russian Music Society. His daughter, Elena Stasova (1873–1966), was a prominent Marxist revolutionary and functionary in the Soviet government.[12]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. Jump up ^ http://enc-dic.com/enc_music/Stasov-V-V-6821.html
  2. Jump up ^ Figes, 177.
  3. Jump up ^ Figes, 178.
  4. Jump up ^ Brown, David, Tchaikovsky: The Man and His Music (New York: Pegasus Books, 2007), 74-77
  5. Jump up ^ Holden, Anthony, Tchaikovsky: A Biography (New York:New York: Random House, 1995), 248
  6. Jump up ^ Holden, 140
  7. Jump up ^ "Our Music During the Last Twenty-Five Years," first published in Vestnik Europy, October 1883, reprinted in Selected Essays on Music (New York, 1968), 112. As quoted in Holden, 88.
  8. Jump up ^ Volkov, 87.
  9. Jump up ^ Quoted in Mussorgsky, Literaturnoe nasledie (Literary Heritage), 17. As quoted in Volkov, 87.
  10. Jump up ^ Quoted in Mussorgsky, Literaturnoe nasledie (Literary Heritage), 20. As quoted in Volkov, 87.
  11. Jump up ^ Volkov, 130-131.
  12. Jump up ^ Cathy Porter, Alexandra Kollontai: The Lonely Struggle of the Woman Who Defied Lenin. New York: The Dial Press, 1980; pg. 38.

Sources[edit]

  • Brown, David, Tchaikovsky: The Man and His Music (New York: Pegasus Books, 2007).
  • Figes, Orlando, Natasha's Dance: A Cultural History of Russia(New York: Metropolitan Books, 2002).
  • Holden, Anthony, Tchaikovsky: A Biography (New York:New York: Random House, 1995).
  • Volkov, Solomon, St. Petersburg: A Cultural History (New York: The Free Press, A division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., 1995).

External links[edit]

update link

No comments:

Post a Comment