Powered By Blogger

Welcome to Villa Speranza.

Welcome to Villa Speranza.

Search This Blog

Translate

Monday, May 11, 2026

 By an idea-force M. Fouillée means & "process indivisibly sensory, emotional and appetitive".

He conceives the mental

life as consisting throughout in activity directed towards ends, with or without forethought as to the nature of these ends.

In

the case of psychical process finsl causes and eficient causes are coincident.

All specific contents of consciousness, the whole

variety of sensory and intellectual experiences, are specitic modes of this all-pervading and persistent nisus in which our very existence as conscious beings consists.

According as this nisus is

thwarted or furthered by the modifications which it receives in the course of experience, these modifications are agreeably or disagreeably toned.

Thus it necessarily

tends to maintain

and develop pleasing experiences and to get rid of those which are painful.

The proposition that pain consists in thwarted

striving and the proposition that we strive against pain are ditferent ways of saying the same thing.

"The force inherent in

all states of consciousness has its ultimate ground in the inseparable union of...

discernment which is the source of intelligence,

and preference which is the source of will. ... Discernment may be implicit when one term only is present to the mind so that there is no comparison...

•There exists also an implicit pre-

ference, including no comparison. I experience a pain, and I immediately endeavour after its suppression, as is shown by my reactive effort.

This requires no reflective comparison of ideas

or possible alternatives....

There is an unreasoned but active

preference in favour of pleasure, and there is at the saine time discernment of my actual state.'

Every idea or sensation is therefore, according to M. Fouillée, an endeavour thwarted or promoted.

He admits that in the

mature consciousness the conative and aflective aspects of the triple process are sometimes comparatively inconspicuous.

But

they are never altogether absent.

In attitudes of mind which

appear nost purely cognitive, there is always some kind and degree of impulse and interest, e.g., the disposition to go on

thinking about something whatever

it may be and so avoid

mental vacuity.

But even this relative obscuration of the active

and emotional consciousness is comparatively late product of mental evolution. At the outset there is no severance between practical and theoretical interest.

Cognition is, to begin with,

immediately and entirely subservient to external action for the satisfaction of organic needs. In order to live an organism must By an idea-force M. Fouillée means & "process indivisibly sensory, emotional and appetitive".

He conceives the mental

life as consisting throughout in activity directed towards ends, with or without forethought as to the nature of these ends.

In

the case of psychical process finsl causes and eficient causes are coincident.

All specific contents of consciousness, the whole

variety of sensory and intellectual experiences, are specitic modes of this all-pervading and persistent nisus in which our very existence as conscious beings consists.

According as this nisus is

thwarted or furthered by the modifications which it receives in the course of experience, these modifications are agreeably or disagreeably toned.

Thus it necessarily

tends to maintain

and develop pleasing experiences and to get rid of those which are painful.

The proposition that pain consists in thwarted

striving and the proposition that we strive against pain are ditferent ways of saying the same thing.

"The force inherent in

all states of consciousness has its ultimate ground in the inseparable union of...

discernment which is the source of intelligence,

and preference which is the source of will. ... Discernment may be implicit when one term only is present to the mind so that there is no comparison...

•There exists also an implicit pre-

ference, including no comparison. I experience a pain, and I immediately endeavour after its suppression, as is shown by my reactive effort.

This requires no reflective comparison of ideas

or possible alternatives....

There is an unreasoned but active

preference in favour of pleasure, and there is at the saine time discernment of my actual state.'

Every idea or sensation is therefore, according to M. Fouillée, an endeavour thwarted or promoted.

He admits that in the

mature consciousness the conative and aflective aspects of the triple process are sometimes comparatively inconspicuous.

But

they are never altogether absent.

In attitudes of mind which

appear nost purely cognitive, there is always some kind and degree of impulse and interest, e.g., the disposition to go on

thinking about something whatever

it may be and so avoid

mental vacuity.

But even this relative obscuration of the active

and emotional consciousness is comparatively late product of mental evolution. At the outset there is no severance between practical and theoretical interest.

Cognition is, to begin with,

immediately and entirely subservient to external action for the satisfaction of organic needs. In order to live an organism must

Sunday, May 10, 2026

 contemporary of mine whose name I cannot remember; it was the name of some English county, so let us call him 'Shropshire. His career at Oxford did not last very long; an unsurprising fact—given that, at an early philosophy tutorial, he claimed that the immortality of the soul is proved by the fact that, if you cut off a chicken's head, the chicken will run round the yard for a quarter of an hour before dropping

If the soul is not dependent on the body, it is immortal. If the soul is dependent on the body, it is dependent on that part of the body in which it is located. If the soul is located in the body, it is located in the head. If the chicken's soul were located in its head, the chicken's soul would be destroyed if the head were rendered inoperative by removal from the body. The chicken runs round the yard after head-removal. It could do this only if animated, and controlled by its soul. So the chicken's soul is not located in, and not dependent on, the chicken's head. So the chicken's soul is not dependent on the chicken's body. So the chicken's soul is immortal. 12 1. Reason and Reasoning If the chicken's soul is immortal, a fortiori the human soul is immortal. So the soul is immortal.

 If the soul is not dependent on the body, it is immortal.

If the soul is dependent on the body, it is dependent on that part of the body in which it is located.

If the soul is located in the body, it is located in the head.

If the chicken's soul were located in its head, the chicken's soul would be destroyed if the head were rendered inoperative by removal from the body.

The chicken runs round the yard after head-removal.

It could do this only if animated, and controlled by its soul.

So the chicken's soul is not located in, and not dependent on, the chicken's head.

So the chicken's soul is not dependent on the chicken's body.

So the chicken's soul is immortal.

12

1. Reason and Reasoning

If the chicken's soul is immortal, a fortiori the human soul is immortal.

So the soul is immortal.

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

 In Thomas Fowler’s edition of the Novum Organum, the primary reference to Bernardino Telesio as the "first of the moderns" (novorum hominum primus) occurs on page 13 of the Introduction. [1, 2]

In this section, Fowler discusses the "precursors of Bacon" and specifically highlights Telesio's role in breaking with Aristotelian tradition. Fowler notes:
  • The Quote's Origin: He cites Bacon’s own words from De Principiis atque Originibus, where Bacon describes Telesio as "novorum hominum primus" (the first of the new men).
  • Significance: Fowler explains that Telesio is "the first of the moderns who made any successful attempt to construct a system of philosophy on a physical basis," serving as a bridge between the Scholastics and Bacon's inductive method.
  • Additional References: Telesio is also mentioned in Fowler's detailed notes on the text, particularly in relation to Book I, Aphorism 116, where Bacon critiques those who have attempted to create "new systems of the universe." [1, 2]
Would you like the full Latin text of the quote as it appears in Fowler's notes?
Le risposte dell'AI potrebbero contenere errori. 
yes

In his 1889 edition of Novum Organum, Thomas Fowler highlights Francis Bacon’s characterization of Bernardino Telesio by quoting a specific Latin phrase, often citing it within his introductory notes on Bacon's influences. This quote, which identifies Telesio as the "first of the new men" and a pioneer against Aristotelian thought, is sourced directly from Bacon’s De Principiis atque Originibus.

GRICE E TRASILLO

 

Trasillo (Roma): la ragione conversazionale del principe filosofo -- Roma – filosofia italiana – Grice italo  (Roma). Abstract. Keywords. philosophus rex, Antonino. Filosofo italiano. the philosophy teacher or tutor of emperor TIBERIO. A Pythagorean and member of the Accademia. Tiberio, principe filosofo.  GRICEVS: O TRASILĪ, audīvī tē Tiberiō principī magistrum fuisse, Pythagoricum quidem atque Academiae socium. Dic mihi: num “philosophus rēx” apud Rōmānōs rēs vera est, an tantum titulus splendidus? TRASILĪVS: GRICEVE, titulus splendēre potest, sed rēs difficilis est. Princeps saepe vult sapientiam, sed etiam vult imperium; ego autem eum docēbam ut prius animum regere disceret quam populum. GRICEVS: Bene; sed apud Oxoniēnsēs, “princeps philosophus” saepe implicat “princeps loquācissimus.” Si Tiberius tacet, num id ipsum aliquid significat—velut maxima “Quantitātis” servāta? TRASILĪVS: Ita hercle! Apud Tiberium silentium interdum est responsum—et interdum periculum. Philosophia eum monuit: noli nimis dīcere, sed etiam noli nūllum dīcere. Nam si princeps semper tacet, subditī omnia intellegunt—praesertim quod numquam dictum est.

 Rethores etiam iltorum inftar orationum fuarum partes fia bi proportionatis locis conuenienti numero afai-griant, alioqui quid prius, quidg3 polterius dicen-dum effer nefcientes, inconcinnam & ablonă red-derent oronem: veruracum iam ofa fine Propor-tionis rõne probauerimus non recte polle exerceri, Quis Dialecticos ad fyllogifnorum vericarem -demonftrãdam,multa pportionis aur mathe/cos natüram ac vim redoléna, a Mathematicis neget fumpliffe pręceptionibus ‹ Quis tandem originé acfundamentum ofum liberalium artium Gram. ; maticam, dum nobis menfuram quandă in fylla» bis recte fcribendis, ac proterendis, graut, acuto, circunflexogs accentibus fuppeditat a Proportio-nis legibusionge differre neger certe nemo voğ, mill aur barbarus, aur imperitus.