Catalogue Raisonné of J. L.
Speranza’s Publications – H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I
Verbali: Ti
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tiberiano – Ossia: Grice
e Tiberiano: la ragione conversazionale e l’implicatura conversazionale. Note
su Amnis ibat. Il Gruppo di Gioco di H. P. Grice. Tiberiano: la ragione
conversazionale e l’implicatura conversazionale. Tiberiano (336 A. D.). Amnis
ibat.
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tiberio – Ossia: Grice e
Tiberio: la ragione conversazionale della filosofia e l’implicatura
conversazionale dell’anti-filosofia – Roma – filosofia italiana – Grice italo
(Roma). not the prince. Not the prince. This one
writes on philosophical subjects. Grice: “It would have been a good thing if
the OTHER one did! Tiberio (Roma, Lazio): la ragione
conversazionale della filosofia e l’implicatura conversazionale
dell’anti-filosofia –not the prince. Not the prince.
This one writes on philosophical subjects. Grice: “It would have been a good
thing if the OTHER one did!” GRICEVS: Salve, Tiberi! Dic mihi: quid tibi videtur esse
ratio inter philosophiam et anti-philosophiam? TIBERIVS: Ave, Grice! Ego credo anti-philosophiam esse
provocationem philosophiae—non negationem, sed potius invitationem ad
dubitandum. GRICEVS: Pulchre dictum! Potesne exemplum dare ubi anti-philosophia
vere auxilio fuit progressionis philosophiae? TIBERIVS: Certe! Cogita de
Socrate, qui saepe quaestiones ponebat quae lineas philosophiae perturbabant;
eius “ignorantia docta” initium dedit novis modis cogitandi. Sic anti-philosophia fit instrumentum ipsius sapientiae. Tiberio (XXX).
Dicta.
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tiburtio – Ossia: Grice e
Tiburtio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tiburtio -- The gens Tiburtia was a minor
plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members
of this gens are mentioned in history, but a large number are known from
inscriptions. Origin The nomen Tiburtius
is derived from the earlier cognomen Tiburtes, referring to an inhabitant of
the ancient city of Tibur in Latium. This indicates that the Tiburtii claimed
descent from a Tiburtine family that settled at Rome, or else obtained Roman
citizenship at an early period. Chase classifies the nomen among those
gentilicia that either originated at Rome, or which cannot be shown to have
come from anywhere else.[1] Praenomina
The main praenomina of the Tiburtii were Lucius and Gaius, the two most common
names at all periods of Roman history. While a number of other common
praenomina are found amongst the inscriptions of this gens, the only ones that
appear more than once are Aulus, Marcus, Publius, and Titus. Members This list includes abbreviated
praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation. Aulus Tiburtius
A. l. Timiso, one of the leaders of the ironworkers' guild at Praeneste in
Latium during the late second century or the early first century BC.[2]
Tiburtia Posilla, buried at Tarquinii in Etruria, aged sixty, in a tomb dating
from the first quarter of the first century BC.[3] Gaius Tiburtius C. l.
Flaccus, a freedman named in an inscription from Casilinum in Campania, dating
from the first half of the first century BC.[4] Lucius Tiburtius, a centurion
who was present at a parley along the Apsus between the forces of Caesar and
Pompeius during the Civil War. As Titus Labienus conferred with Publius
Vatinius, the soldiers of each side began fighting, and Tiburtius was among the
officers who were wounded.[5] Quintus Tiburtius Q. l. Menolavus, a freedman
buried at Casilinum, in a tomb dating from the late first century BC.[6]
Tiburtia T. l., buried at Baeterrae in Gallia Narbonensis, in a tomb dating
from the first half of the first century.[7] Tiburtia Ɔ. l. Chelido, a
freedwoman buried at Rome in the first half of the first century.[8] Gaius
Tiburtius M. f. Clemens, buried at Ateste in Venetia and Histria, in a tomb
built by his sister, Tiburtia Quarta, dating from the first half of the first
century.[9] Tiburtia M. f. Quarta, dedicated a tomb at Ateste, dating from the
first half of the first century, for her brother, Gaius Tiburtius Clemens.[9]
Publius Tiburtius Buttus, one of the principals in an auction at Pompeii in AD
55.[10] Tiburtia Egloge, named in an inscription from Pompeii.[11] Lucius
Tiburtius Atticus, a freedman, buried along with Lucius Tiburtius Telesphorus,
in a first-century tomb at Rome, built by Lucius Tiburtius Tyrannus and Artoria
Corinthas.[12] Lucius Tiburtius L. f. Priamus, one of the Seviri Augustales at
Ticinum in Gallia Narbonensis, at some point during the first century.[13]
Lucius Tiburtius Telesphorus, buried along with the freedman Lucius Tiburtius
Atticus, in a first-century tomb at Rome, built by his client, Lucius Tiburtius
Tyrannus, and Artoria Corinthias.[12] Lucius Tiburtius Tyrannus, along with
Artoria Corinthias, built a first-century tomb at Rome for Tyrannus' patron,
Lucius Tiburtius Telesphorus, and the freedman Lucius Tiburtius Atticus.[12]
Tiburtia T. l. Aura, a freedwoman buried in a family sepulchre at Rome, built
by her son, Titus Tiburtius Natalis, for himself, his wife, Venelia Primigenia,
and his mother, dating to the middle of the first century.[14] Titus Tiburtius
T. Ɔ l. Natalis, a freedman, built a family sepulchre at Rome, dating to the
middle of the first century, for himself, his wife, Venelia Primigenia, and his
mother, Tiburtia Aura.[14] Tiburtius Heros, named in a sepulchral inscription
from Rome, dating from the late first century.[15] Aulus Tiburtius Campester,
buried at Salona in Dalmatia, aged forty, in a tomb dedicated by his children,
dating from the first century, or the first half of the second.[16] Marcus
Tiburtius Thiasus, buried in a first- or second-century tomb at Rome, aged
twenty-five, along with Prima, perhaps his wife.[17] Tiburtia Am[...]is, buried
at Carales in Sardinia, aged sixty, in a tomb dedicated by her daughter, Julia
Amana, dating between the middle of the first century, and the middle of the
second.[18] Tiburtia Nice, named in an inscription from Concordia in Venetia
and Histria, dating from the late first or early second century.[19] Tiburtia
Euphrosyne, dedicated a tomb at Rome for her brother, Tiberius Claudius
Bithynicus, dating between the middle of the first century, and the end of the
second.[20] Tiburtia Felicula, along with [...]cilius, dedicated a tomb at
Narnia in Umbria, dating from the first half of the second century, for her
husband, Titus Gargilius Januarius.[21] Gaius Tiburtius Verna, a second-century
maker of a lead pipes at Tibur in Latium.[22] Tiburtius Serotinus, dedicated a
tomb at Mutina in Cisalpine Gaul, dating between the middle and the end of the
second century, for Faustina, a psaltria, or harpist.[23] Gaius Tiburtius
Alphius, together with his wife, Valeria Potita, built a tomb at Tibur, dating
from the late second century, or the first half of the third, to their foster
son, Gaius Sextilius Rufus, aged seven years, ten months, and ten days.[24]
Tiburtius, supposed to have been a Christian martyr in the early third century,
along with his brother, Valerian, and the latter's wife, Caecilia, and a
soldier named Maximus, around AD 230. As Christian saints, Tiburtius, Valerian,
and Maximus were traditionally honored with a feast on the eighteenth day
before the Kalends of May (April 14), while Caecilia's feast day is November
22.[25] Tiburtius, buried at Rome, in a tomb dating from the early fourth
century.[26] Tiburtius, named in a fourth-century sepulchral inscription from
Rome.[27] Tiburtius, dedicated a fourth-century tomb at Rome for his wife,
Eulalia.[28] Tiburtius, buried at Rome on the seventh day before the Nones of
December[i] in AD 377, aged twenty-six years, nine months, and eleven days.[29]
Tiburtius, buried at Rome, in a tomb dating from the end of the fourth century,
or the first quarter of the fifth.[30] Tiburtius Severus, a shopkeeper at Rome
early in the fifth century, according to an inscription dating between AD 402
and 408.[31] Undated Tiburtii Lucius L. f. Tiburtius, the son of Lucius
Tiburtius [...]io, for whom he and his mother, Vibia, built a tomb at Rome.[32]
Tiburtia Anytes, buried at Rome, with a monument dedicated by her husband,
Botrys.[33] Gaius Tiburtius C. f. Atticus, buried at Tibur in a tomb dedicated
by his son, also named Gaius Tiburtius Atticus, was twice one of the
quattuorviri of Tibur.[34] Gaius Tiburtius C. f. C. n. Atticus, dedicated a
tomb at Tibur for his father, also named Gaius Tiburtius Atticus.[34] Tiburtia
Chrotis, named in a sepulchral inscription from Rome.[35] Gaius Tiburtius
Comus, buried at Tibur.[36] Gaius Tiburtius Felix, dedicated a tomb at Tibur
for his wife, Flavia Nice.[37] Lucius Tiburtius Felix, buried at Rome, aged
twenty-five, in a tomb built by his wife, Laberia Briseis.[38] Lucius Tiburtius
[...]io, buried at Rome, in a tomb built by his son, Lucius Tiburtius, and
wife, Vibia Apr[...].[32] Publius Tiburtius Julianus, a soldier in the Legio
III Augusta, buried at Lambaesis in Numidia, with a monument from his heir,
Gaius Sergius Fortunatus.[39] Tiburtia Maxima, buried at the site of modern
Loulou, formerly part of Numidia, aged fifty-five.[40] Sextus Tiburtius Sex. l.
Nicephor, a freedman buried at Rome, along with the freedwoman Appuleia Helena
and the freedman Lucius Appuleius Demetrius.[41] Tiburtius Rusticus, dedicated
a monument at Lambaesis for his father, Lucius Tiburtius Saturninus.[42] Gaius
Tiburtius Saturninus, a soldier stationed at Lambaesis.[43] Lucius Tiburtius
Saturninus, buried at Lambaesis, aged ninety-six, with a monument from his son,
Tiburtius Rusticus.[42] Tiburtia M. f. Secunda, buried at Ateste.[44] Tiburtia
Sphragis, together with her husband, Polybius, dedicated a tomb at Tibur for
their son, Claudius Charopinus, aged twenty-five.[45] Decimus Tiburtius
Successus, built a family sepulchre at Rome for himself, his wife, Cominia
Euthychia, his patron, Cominia Heurisis, and Titius Secundus.[46] Notes This may be a mistake, as the Nones of
December fall on December 5, and counting inclusively, in the Roman fashion,
December 2 would be the fourth day before the Nones; December 1 would be the
Kalends of December, and the seventh day before the Nones would be November 29.
If this date is not intentional, it may be that the inscription should say the
seventh day before the Kalends, November 25, or the seventh day before the
Ides, December 7. See also List of Roman gentes References Chase, pp. 131, 132. CIL I, 3068.
CIL XI, 3492. CIL
X, 3785. Caesar, De Bello Civili, iii.
19. CIL X, 3984. AE 2013, 1047. CIL VI, 26254. CIL V, 2511.
CIL IV, 3340,014. CIL IV, 9934a. CIL VI, 27403. AE 1992, 791.
CIL VI, 27406, CIL VI, 27407. AE
1993, 381. CIL III, 2559. CIL VI, 27410. AE 2006, 521.
CIL V, 1941. CIL VI, 27411. CIL XI, 4135.
CIL XIV, 3708, CIL XV, 7909a. CIL
XI, 870. CIL XIV, 3845. ICUR, i. 93.
ICUR, iv. 10227. ICUR, iv.
10226. ICUR, ix. 24767. ICUR, viii. 20795. ICUR, vi. 15954,3. CIL VI, 9920.
CIL VI, 27402. CIL VI, 7299. Inscriptiones Italiae, iv. 1, 200. CIL VI, 19520. Inscriptiones Italiae, iv. 1, 460. CIL XIV, 3768. CIL VI, 27404. CIL VIII, 3249. Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii.
2, 6153. CIL VI, 38023. CIL VIII, 18462. CIL VIII, 2568. CIL V, 2708.
CIL XIV, 3745. CIL VI, 27409.
Bibliography Gaius Julius Caesar, Commentarii de Bello Civili (Commentaries on
the Civil War). Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (The
Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie
der Wissenschaften (1853–present). Giovanni Battista
de Rossi, Inscriptiones Christianae Urbis Romanae Septimo Saeculo Antiquiores
(Christian Inscriptions from Rome of the First Seven Centuries, abbreviated
ICUR), Vatican Library, Rome (1857–1861, 1888). René Cagnat et alii, L'Année épigraphique (The Year in Epigraphy,
abbreviated AE), Presses Universitaires de France (1888–present). George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman Praenomina", in
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII, pp. 103–184 (1897). Stéphane Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie
(Latin Inscriptions from Algeria), Edouard Champion, Paris (1922–present). Inscriptiones Italiae (Inscriptions from Italy), Rome (1931-present).
Category: Roman gentes And for THIS gens? Thanks The gens
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tiburtio
– Ossia: Grice e Tiburtio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tiburtio For the
Tiburtii, the most Grice-Speranza-worthy figure is, I think, neither the
Christian martyr nor the maker of lead pipes, but Lucius Tiburtius, the
centurion present at the famous parley between Caesar's and Pompey's forces on
the river Apsus during the Civil War. Caesar himself records the episode.
[GREXv3 | Word] Why? Because the entire scene is about a conversational
breakdown under conditions where conversation is supposed to prevent violence.
The two sides are meeting to talk. Then the talking stops working. Then the
missiles start. It is almost a political version of Grice's problem: What are the conditions under which rational
communication succeeds? So the vignette would
be: (*) VATINIVS. Audiamus. (Let us
listen.) CENTVRIO. Loquuntur. (They are talking.) VATINIVS. Ergo pax erit?
(Then there will be peace?) CENTVRIO. Non semper. (Not always.) +> The
occurrence of communication does not guarantee the achievement of
agreement. A nice warning against the
naïve conversational optimism sometimes imputed to Grice. But there is another Tiburtius who may appeal
even more to your interests: Gaius Tiburtius Verna, the maker of lead pipes at
Tibur. [GREXv3 | Word] Now that immediately suggests a philosophy-of-language
joke. A pipe carries water. Words carry meaning. The Roman plumber becomes a
semiotic engineer. Hence: (*) CIVIS.
Quid facis? (What do you make?) VERNA. Fistulas. (Pipes.) CIVIS. Et quid per
eas transit? (And what passes through them?) VERNA. Aqua. (Water.) CIVIS. Si
philosophus esses? (If you were a philosopher?) VERNA. Significatio. (Meaning.)
+> Communication is often pictured as transmission through a conduit. That would amuse both Ryle and Grice. And there is a final, irresistibly Urmsonian
candidate: Tiburtius, the supposed Christian martyr associated with Valerian
and Caecilia. [GREXv3 | Word] Here the very name becomes a descriptor: Tiburtius
originally means, effectively,
"the man from Tibur."
Thus a Roman asks: Quis est? (Who
is he?) And receives: Tiburtius. (The Tiburtine.) The proper name preserves an
origin-description long after anyone is using it descriptively. That is almost
straight out of the later philosophy of names. A Speranzian gloss might be: The Tiburtii are useful because their nomen
begins as a geographical description and ends as a hereditary designation. What
once meant "the man from Tibur" eventually names people who may never
have set foot there. The history of a proper name is often the history of a
forgotten description. [GREXv3 | Word] And about the parley -- do we have the
Latin -- for Caesar can converse with Pompei, r a delegate (centurion T.) can
converse with another delegate? What DID happen, do we know? Thanks -- In fact,
Grice says that 'represents' is best understood as a legate conversing with
another legate in a parley doing for a FORCE to do what a FORCE cannnot do for
itself -- engage in conversation with another force -- and Caesar conversing
with Pompeo would be too dangerous and risky when a legate can safely be sent as
prop. Thanks. Was that our hero T., or was he WITNESS to it? Thanks Yes. And
the answer is actually better for your Gricean analogy than I had first
suggested. Lucius Tiburtius was not one of the negotiators. He was a centurion
present at the meeting and wounded when the parley broke down. Caesar names him
specifically among the casualties. [loebclassics.com], [loebclassics.com] The
negotiators were: Publius Vatinius on
Caesar's side, Titus Labienus on Pompey's side. [loebclassics.com] Caesar's Latin (BC 3.19) is extremely
revealing: Titus Labienus prodit. Summissa
oratione loqui de pace atque altercari cum Vatinio incipit. ("Titus Labienus stepped forward. In a subdued tone he began to
speak about peace and to argue with Vatinius.") [loebclassics.com] Then:
Quorum mediam orationem interrumpunt subito undique tela immissa... ("Their conversation was suddenly interrupted by missiles hurled
from all sides...") [loebclassics.com]
Then comes the line concerning our Tiburtius: Vulnerantur tamen complures, in his Cornelius
Balbus, M. Plotius, L. Tiburtius centuriones militesque nonnulli.
("Several men were wounded, including Cornelius Balbus, Marcus Plotius,
Lucius Tiburtius, together with some centurions and soldiers.")
[loebclassics.com], [loebclassics.com]
And then Labienus delivers the killer line: Desinite ergo de compositione loqui; nam
nobis nisi Caesaris capite relato pax esse nulla potest. ("Stop talking
about a settlement then; for there can be no peace for us unless Caesar's head
is brought back.") [loebclassics.com], [loebclassics.com] This is why the episode is so striking. The
legates are actually conversing: loqui
de pace ("to talk about peace") [loebclassics.com] Exactly as in your Gricean model. A Roman
army cannot literally conduct a conversation. A force does not speak. Someone
must speak for it. So we have: Caesar's
army represented by Vatinius, Pompey's army represented by Labienus.
[loebclassics.com] That is very close to
your point that "representation" can be understood as: one person doing conversationally what a
collective entity cannot do for itself.
Indeed, Caesar's language is almost embarrassingly Gricean: loqui, oratio, altercari, compositio. The entire affair is presented as an
attempted conversation. [loebclassics.com] The conversational catastrophe comes
when missiles replace utterances. One could almost render the sequence as: VATINIVS: Let us discuss peace. LABIENVS: Let
us discuss peace. [Missiles] LABIENVS: There is no peace except through
Caesar's death. The remarkable thing is
that Labienus' final remark can be read as a declaration that the
conversational presupposition was false all along. The common ground seemed to
be: "peace is a possible
outcome." Labienus finally
reveals: "peace is not among the
available options." A wonderfully
bleak Gricean lesson: Conversation
failed not because the parties lacked language, but because they lacked a
mutually acceptable end. [loebclassics.com], [loebclassics.com] And poor Lucius Tiburtius, our Tiburtius, is
remembered chiefly as the centurion who got hit when the transition was made
from dialogue to projectiles. [loebclassics.com], [loebclassics.com] and this
may be the source of that scene in Handel's Giulio Cesare in Egitto which opens
with POMPEY's head (caput) rolling on stage instead. Thanks -- it is
intersesting that Giulio has the OTHER side 'talk of peace' -- and the first
missile perhaps coming from Giulio's side, hence Labienus's 'Let weapons
speak'. Thanks That's a very plausible literary connection, although I would be
careful to distinguish influence from direct source. What we can say securely
is that in Caesar's account of the Apsus parley, Titus Labienus ends by
declaring: "nam nobis nisi Caesaris
capite relato pax esse nulla potest"
that is, "for there can be
no peace for us unless Caesar's head is brought back." [loebclassics.com],
[loebclassics.com] The dramatic object
is therefore already present in Caesar's narrative: Caesar's head (Caesaris caput). In Handel's Giulio Cesare in Egitto, by
contrast, the famous stage shock is the presentation of Pompey's head. That
comes from the historical tradition surrounding Pompey's murder in Egypt, and
it is certainly one of the most memorable "heads on stage" in
classical reception. What is fascinating in the Apsus episode is precisely the
conversational structure. Caesar says that:
a meeting is arranged, a large crowd gathers, everyone appears intent on
peace, Labienus begins speaking quietly with Vatinius about peace, missiles
suddenly interrupt the conversation. [loebclassics.com] You raise an interesting point about who
threw first. Caesar's text says:
"quorum mediam orationem interrumpunt subito undique tela
immissa" ("their conversation
was suddenly interrupted by missiles hurled from all sides").
[loebclassics.com] The crucial phrase is:
undique "from all sides." [loebclassics.com] So in the text as we have it, Caesar does not
explicitly identify a first thrower. He reports missiles arriving "from
all sides." We therefore cannot securely attribute the first attack to
Caesar's side on the basis of this passage alone. From a Gricean angle,
however, the remarkable move is Labienus' final declaration: Stop talking about settlement; there is no
peace except through Caesar's death. [loebclassics.com],
[loebclassics.com] One can read that as
a retrospective cancellation of the conversational enterprise. The common ground
seemed to be: "We are here to
discuss possible peace." Labienus
reveals: "Peace is not among the
available outcomes." That is almost
an anti-Gricean moment. The participants are cooperating conversationally, but
not cooperating politically. Speranza might put it: The parley fails because language succeeds.
Conversation uncovers the true position of the parties. Once Labienus has
stated that only Caesar's head can produce peace, the missiles merely make
explicit what the conversation has already discovered. [loebclassics.com],
[loebclassics.com] And Labienus seems to be playing with 'peace' -- when
starting to talk 'peace' peace means one thing -- when he has Caesar's head as
requiriste for 'peace' -- peace is methonymic for Caesar's defeat after war --
not peace. Thanks -- cf. Pax romana instaurated actually by Cesare? Thanks --
as euphemism for 'Roman control via weapon deterrence'? Thanks Yes, I think
that is exactly the interesting semantic move in the passage. At the beginning
of the interview, both sides seem to be using pax in the ordinary diplomatic
sense: cessation of hostilities through
agreement. Caesar's narrative stresses
that everyone appeared intent on peace:
omnium animi intenti esse ad pacem videbantur ("everyone seemed to
be intent on peace"). [loebclassics.com]
Then Labienus concludes: nobis
nisi Caesaris capite relato pax esse nulla potest ("for us there can be no
peace unless Caesar's head is brought back"). [loebclassics.com],
[loebclassics.com] Grice would
immediately ask whether pax has undergone a shift. Strictly speaking, Labienus
is still using the same word. But the conditions of application have altered so
drastically that the common ground collapses. For Vatinius: pax = negotiated settlement. For Labienus:
pax = the political state that exists after Caesar has been
eliminated. So one might say that
"peace" is becoming a kind of euphemistic endpoint of victory.
Not: "Let us stop fighting and
compromise." But: "Once you have lost, peace will
exist." That is very close to what
later ages often mean by "peace through victory." Your comparison with the Pax Romana is quite
apt, though one should be historically careful. The expression Pax Romana is
modern shorthand for the long period of imperial stability associated above all
with Augustus and his successors rather than Julius Caesar himself. But even
ancient writers sometimes recognized the ambiguity. Roman "peace"
frequently meant: absence of civil war,
under conditions of Roman dominance.
Hence the famous paradox: peace
achieved by military success. Tacitus
gives the classic cynical formulation in the speech of Calgacus: ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
"Where they make a desert, they call it peace." Not a definition of Roman policy, of course,
but a hostile interpretation of it. A Grice-Speranza gloss might run: At the start of the parley, "peace"
means an alternative to war. By the end, it means the condition resulting from
the successful prosecution of war against Caesar. The lexical item remains
unchanged; the practical content has shifted. Labienus does not reject peace.
He redefines the route by which it may be obtained. In Gricean terms, the
disagreement concerns not the word but the presupposed conditions of its
satisfaction.
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Ticinio – Ossia: Grice e
Ticinio – Grex griceiana: verbalia: Ticinio. The gens
Ticinia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Almost no members of
this gens are mentioned in history, but a few are known from inscriptions. Origin The nomen Ticinius belongs to a class
of gentilicia formed using the suffix -inius, usually derived from cognomina
ending in -inus.[1] Here the root seems to be Ticinus, presumably referring to
an inhabitant of Ticinum in Gallia Narbonensis.
Members This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of
this practice, see filiation. Publius Ticinius Mela, brought the first barber
to Rome from Sicily circa 300 BC.[2][3] Ticinius, dedicated a family sepulchre
at Savaria in Pannonia Superior, dating from the latter half of the second
century, for his wife, Ticinia [...]nia.[4] Ticinia [...]nia, buried at Savaria
in a family sepulchre built by her husband, Ticinius, dating from the latter
half of the second century.[4] Undated Ticinii Marcus Ticinius, described in an
inscription from Turris Libisonis in Sardinia as procurator, or governor of the
province, in an unknown year. However, the inscription is thought to be a
forgery.[5] Ticinius Victor, buried at the site of modern Esnakit, formerly
part of Africa Proconsularis, aged seventy.[6] See also List of Roman gentes
References Chase, pp. 125, 126. Varro, Rerum Rusticarum, ii. 11. § 10. Pliny, Historia Naturalis, vii. 59. CIL III, 4214. CIL X, 1479.
BCTH, 1903-192. Bibliography Marcus Terentius Varro, Rerum Rusticarum
(Rural Matters). Gaius Plinius Secundus (Pliny the Elder), Historia Naturalis
(Natural History). Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (The
Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie
der Wissenschaften (1853–present). George Davis Chase, "The Origin of
Roman Praenomina", in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII,
pp. 103–184 (1897). Bulletin Archéologique du Comité des Travaux Historiques et
Scientifiques (Archaeological Bulletin of the Committee on Historic and
Scientific Works, abbreviated BCTH), Imprimerie Nationale, Paris (1885–1973).
Category: Roman gentes And for THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Ticinio – Ossia: Grice
e Ticinio – Grex griceiana: verbalia: Ticinio. For the
Ticinii, the choice is easy and, indeed, barberously Gricean: Publius Ticinius Mela, who, according to
Varro and Pliny the Elder, brought the first barber to Rome from Sicily around
300 BC. [GREXv3 | Word] This is one of
those tiny antiquarian facts that Varro loved and that Grice would have adored.
Why? Because a barber is a conversational professional. Before the philosopher,
before the grammarian, before the don, there is the barber. One might even
say: The barber removes hair. The
philosopher removes confusions. The
Grice-Speranza vignette practically writes itself: (*) TONSOR. Quomodo vis tonderi? (How do you
wish to be cut?) CIVIS. Brevius. (Shorter.) TONSOR. Quantum brevius? (How much
shorter?) +> Instructions require contextual completion before they become
actionable. That is pure
ordinary-language philosophy. "Shorter" is not enough. The hearer
must calculate what is meant. And there
is a deeper Varro-Grice joke. The introduction of the barber creates a new
social institution. Before: everyone
cuts hair somehow. After: there is a specialist. Likewise:
before Grice, everyone uses implicatures; after Grice, there is a
specialist. Your earlier remarks about
liber and the transmission of culture suggest another dialogue: (*) CIVIS. Quid novum ex Sicilia attulisti?
(What new thing have you brought from Sicily?) TICINIVS MELA. Tonsorem. (A
barber.) CIVIS. Et quid facit? (And what does he do?) TICINIVS. Loquitur et
radit. (He talks and he shaves.) +> Some professions combine communication
and practical action in a single transaction.
A surprisingly Gricean occupation.
The nice thing is that unlike many of these obscure gentes, the Ticinii
possess a genuine "first": the
first barber at Rome. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza's dry gloss might therefore be:
Varro records that Publius Ticinius Mela imported the first barber into
Rome. Philosophy generally assumes conversation existed beforehand. The barber
merely ensured that it occurred more neatly. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tifernio – Ossia: Grice e
Tifernio – Grex griceiana: verbalia: Tifernio. The gens
Tifernia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this
gens appear in history, but several are known from inscriptions. Origin All of the Tifernii known from
inscriptions from outside of Rome came from Umbria, including at least three
from the town of Tifernum Tiberinum, Tifernum on the Tiber.[1] Unless the town
was named after the Tifernia gens, the Tifernii must have obtained their nomen
from their town of origin. Members This
list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see
filiation. Gaius Tifernius C. f. Sabinus, a youth buried at Tifernum Tiberinum
in Umbria, aged fifteen, in a tomb dating from the early first century.[2]
Gaius Tifernius Alcibiades, a soldier serving in the fifth cohort of the
vigiles at Rome in AD 210.[3] Lucius Tifernius L. f. Verus, a native of Fanum
Fortunae in Umbria, was a soldier in the twelfth urban cohort at Rome in AD
218.[4] Undated Tifernii Tifernius Prudens, the father of Tifernia Sabina, a
woman buried at Tifernum Tiberinum.[5] Tifernia Sabina, daughter of Tifernius
Prudens, buried at Tifernum Tiberinum, in a tomb dedicated by Venia and Aruntia
Ampiana.[5] Tifernius Severus, dedicated a tomb at Rome for his mother,
Satellia Severa.[6] See also List of Roman gentes References Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography, vol.
II,
p. 1207 ("Tifernum", No. 1).
CIL XI, 5949. CIL VI, 1057. CIL VI, 2384.
CIL XI, 5940.
CIL VI, 25872. Bibliography Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus
Inscriptionum Latinarum (The Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL),
Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (1853–present). Dictionary
of Greek and Roman Geography, William Smith, ed., Little, Brown and Company,
Boston (1854). Category: Roman gentes And for THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tifernio – Ossia:
Grice e Tifernio – Grex griceiana: verbalia: Tifernio. For the Tifernii, I think the most Grice-Speranza-worthy feature is not
an individual but the onomastic structure of the gens itself. Unlike the
Thorii, Terentii, or Tettii, the name seems transparently connected with a
place: Tifernius ← Tifernum Tiberinum.
[GREXv3 | Word] That immediately creates
a philosophy-of-reference problem. Originally, one imagines: "the man from Tifernum." Later:
"Tifernius" is simply a
family name. The descriptive content fades, while the designation remains. That
is almost a Kripkean story before Kripke. A Grice-Speranza vignette might
therefore be: (*) VIATOR. Cur Tifernius
vocaris? (Why are you called Tifernius?) TIFERNIVS. Quia maiores mei ex Tiferno
venerunt. (Because my ancestors came from Tifernum.) VIATOR. Et tu? (And you?)
TIFERNIVS. Ego Romae natus sum. (I was born in Rome.) +> A name may preserve
a description long after the description ceases to apply to its bearer. That seems almost made to accompany your
earlier observations about the Tiburtii and "the man from
Tibur." If one insists on choosing
an actual individual, I rather like: Gaius Tifernius Alcibiades, serving in the
fifth cohort of the vigiles in AD 210. [GREXv3 | Word] Simply because the
juxtaposition is delightful: a
thoroughly Umbrian nomen (Tifernius), with the spectacularly Greek cognomen
Alcibiades. The dossier itself becomes
multicultural. One could imagine: (*)
CIVIS. Romanus es an Graecus? (Are you Roman or Greek?) ALCIBIADES. In
inscriptione utrumque. (On the inscription, both.) +> Personal identity may
be carried simultaneously by several naming systems. Very Roman Empire. And there is another tiny Gricean joke hidden
here. The best-attested early member is:
Gaius Tifernius Sabinus, buried at fifteen. [GREXv3 | Word] So the chain becomes: Tifernius, Sabinus, Umbrian town, Roman
citizenship. Everything in the
nomenclature points somewhere else. A Speranzian gloss might be: The Tifernii are useful because their nomen
appears to be a geographical memory. Once, it meant "from Tifernum";
later, it merely named a family. The description survives, the information
fades, and philosophy is left to wonder whether anything descriptive remains
inside the name at all. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tigellio – Ossia: Grice e
Tigellio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tigellio -- The gens Tigellia was an
obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Almost no members
of this gens are mentioned by Roman writers, but a few are known from
inscriptions. Origin The nomen Tigellius
seems to belong to a class of gentilicia formed from cognomina using the
double-diminutive suffix -ellius.[1] The precise origin of the name is not
apparent, as there seems to be no surname Tigus, or any corresponding word in
Latin. Members This list includes
abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation.
Tigellius Sardus, a popular singer and flutist, was a grandson of Cicero's
friend Phamea. Cicero describes the two of them as a pair of worthless
"Sardinians for sale" in a letter written to his friend, Marcus
Fadius Gallus, in 45 BC. He should perhaps be distinguished from the singing teacher
and would-be satirist.[2][3] Marcus Tigellius Hermogenes, a singing teacher who
fancied himself a talented writer, but whose lack of skill was readily
apparent. He became a vehement critic of his contemporary, Horace, whose
satires were a particular object of Hermogenes' ire. He might be the same
person as the singer Tigellius Sardus, mentioned by Cicero, but in some
instances, Horace refers to "Tigellius", and in others
"Hermogenes", as though distinguishing them.[4][5][6] Tigellia
Restuta, buried in a second-century tomb at Rome, built by her son, Marcus
Tigellius Restutus.[7] Marcus Tigellius Restutus, dedicated a second-century
tomb at Rome for his mother, Tigellia Restuta.[7] Tigellia M. f. Potestas,
buried at Rome.[8] See also List of Roman gentes References Chase, p. 124. Cicero, Ad
Familiares, vii. 24. Horace, Satirae, i.
2, 3. Horace, Satirae, i. 3. PIR, vol. III, p.
316 (T, No. 145). Dictionary of Greek
and Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. II, p. 421 ("M. Tigellius
Hermogenes"). CIL VI, 27413. CIL VI, 27412. Bibliography Marcus Tullius
Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares. Quintus Horatius
Flaccus (Horace), Satirae (Satires). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography
and Mythology, William Smith, ed., Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1849).
Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (The Body of Latin
Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der
Wissenschaften (1853–present). George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman
Praenomina", in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII, pp.
103–184 (1897). Paul von Rohden, Elimar Klebs, & Hermann Dessau,
Prosopographia Imperii Romani (The Prosopography of the Roman Empire,
abbreviated PIR), Berlin (1898). Category: Roman gentes And from THIS gens?
Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tigellio
– Ossia: Grice e Tigellio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tigellio -- For the
Tigellii, we hardly need to search for a Gricean angle. They come pre-packaged
with one: Marcus Tigellius Hermogenes,
the singing teacher who criticized Horace's satires and fancied himself a
writer. [GREXv3 | Word] This is almost a
paradigmatic case of what Grice would call the difference between: producing utterances, appreciating
utterances. Or, to borrow from your
earlier Martialian nasus: making
remarks, having the nose to judge remarks.
Tigellius versus Horace The surviving tradition presents Tigellius
Hermogenes as: a singer and teacher of
singing, a critic of Horace, a man whom Horace regarded with considerable
disdain. [GREXv3 | Word] That suggests a
Grice-Speranza dialogue: (*) TIGELLIUS.
Versus tuos reprehendo. (I criticize your verses.) HORATIUS. Intellegisne? (Do
you understand them?) TIGELLIUS. Reprehendere satis est. (Criticizing is
enough.) +> The ability to object does not entail the ability to
evaluate. A very Oxonian theme. The musical angle Since Tigellius is a
singer, he brings us back to something Grice occasionally enjoyed emphasizing:
Conversation is not merely linguistic content. There is also: tone, manner, delivery, performance. A singer is professionally alert to these.
One might imagine: (*) PHILOSOPHUS. Quid
significat haec sententia? (What does this sentence mean?) TIGELLIUS. Quomodo
canitur? (How is it sung?) +> Meaning may depend not only on words but on
their mode of presentation. Not quite
Grice's theory, but close enough to make him suspicious. A stronger candidate: Tigellius Sardus The
other famous member is: Tigellius
Sardus, the popular singer and flautist mentioned by Cicero. Cicero jokingly
groups him together with Phamea as a pair of "Sardinians for sale."
[GREXv3 | Word] This introduces a theme
you often enjoy: reputation. The public knows:
"Tigellius." But what
exactly is the dossier attached to that name? Singer? Satirist? Teacher?
Critic? Perhaps even the same individual under different descriptions? The
ancient evidence itself hesitates. Horace sometimes speaks of
"Tigellius" and elsewhere of "Hermogenes", leading scholars
to wonder whether they are identical or distinct. [GREXv3 | Word] That is
wonderfully Urmsonian: One referent? Two
dossiers? Or two referents mistakenly collapsed? A Speranzian gloss The Tigellii are useful because they are
experts in performance. A philosopher asks what an utterance means. A singer
asks how it is delivered. Horace asks whether the critic understands it. Grice
asks why the hearer understood more than was said. The conversation could
hardly avoid becoming musical. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tigidio – Ossia: Grice
e Tigidio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tigidio -- The gens Tigidia was an
obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. The only member of
this gens to appear in history was Sextus Tigidius Perennis, prefect of the
praetorian guard early in the reign of Commodus, but others are known from
inscriptions.[1] Origin The nomen
Tigidius belongs to a large class of gentilicia formed using the suffix -idius,
originally derived from cognomina ending in -idus, but later regarded as a
regular gentile-forming suffix.[2]
Members This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of
this practice, see filiation. Tigidius Communius, named in an inscription from
Cales in Campania, dating between the late first century BC and the early first
century AD.[3] Gaius Tigidius Barbarus Pines, buried at Tarentum in Calabria,
aged fifty, in a tomb dating from the first half of the first century.[4]
Sextus Tigidius Orestes, one of the Seviri Augustales at Narona in Dalmatia,
listed in an inscription from the first or second century.[5] Tigidius,
dedicated a tomb at the present site of Carassai, formerly part of Picenum,
dating between the late first century and the middle of the second, for Attia
Rufina.[6] Sextus Tigidius Perennis, named praetorian prefect in AD 182,
alongside Publius Tarrutenius Paternus. After the fall of Paternus, Perennis
assumed control of the government by perusading Commodus to spend his time
pursuing pleasure and debauchery. Perennis used his power to enrich himself and
dispose of his enemies,[i] but he suddenly fell from power over his conduct
regarding the soldiers in Britain, and was put to death, along with his son.[7][8][9][10][1][11]
Lucius Tigidius Proculus, buried at Risinium in Dalmatia in a tomb dedicated by
his sister, Tigidia Tertulla, dating between the middle of the second century,
and the end of the third.[12] Tigidia Tertulla, dedicated a tomb at Risinium,
dating between the middle of the second century and the end of the third, for
her brother, Lucius Tigidius Proculus.[12] Undated Tigidii Tigidius, the father
of Julia Aesiva, a woman buried at Augusta Treverorum in Gallia Belgica, in a
tomb dedicated by her husband, Speratius Socralis.[13] Tigidia Sex. f. Accepta,
buried at Firmum Picenum in Picenum.[14] Notes
So according to Herodian and the Historia Augusta, but Cassius Dio has a
more favourable opinion, reporting that Perennis had been a powerful
restraining influence on Commodus, and that his chief fault was in failing to
intercede on behalf of his colleague, Paternus. See also List of Roman gentes
References Dictionary of Greek and Roman
Biography and Mythology, vol. III, pp. 189, 190 ("Perennis"). Chase, pp. 121, 122. CIL X, 4636.
CIL IX, 6170. Šašel,
Inscriptiones Latinae quae in Iugoslavia, ii. 654. AE 1997, 477.
Lampridius, "The Life of Commodus", 4–6, 14; Capitolinus,
"The Life of Pertinax", 3. Herodian, i. 8. §§ 1, 2, 8; i. 9.
Cassius Dio, lxxii. 9–11. AE
1961, 142. PIR, vol. III, pp. 316, 317
(T, No. 146). CIL III, 2560. Finke, "Neue
Inschriften", 44. CIL IX, 5413.
Bibliography Lucius Cassius Dio, Roman History. Herodianus, Tes Meta Marcon
Basileas Istoria (History of the Empire from the Death of Marcus Aurelius).
Aelius Lampridius, Aelius Spartianus, Flavius Vopiscus, Julius Capitolinus,
Trebellius Pollio, and Vulcatius Gallicanus, Historia Augusta (Lives of the
Emperors). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, William
Smith, ed., Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1849). Theodor Mommsen et alii,
Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (The Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated
CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (1853–present). René Cagnat et alii, L'Année épigraphique (The Year in Epigraphy,
abbreviated AE), Presses Universitaires de France (1888–present). George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman Praenomina", in
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII, pp. 103–184 (1897). Paul von
Rohden, Elimar Klebs, & Hermann Dessau, Prosopographia Imperii Romani (The
Prosopography of the Roman Empire, abbreviated PIR), Berlin (1898). Hermann
Finke, "Neue Inschriften", in Berichte der Römisch-Germanischen
Kommission, vol. xvii, pp. 1–107, 198–231 (1927). Anna and Jaroslav Šašel,
Inscriptiones Latinae quae in Iugoslavia inter annos MCMXL et MCMLX repertae et
editae sunt (Inscriptions from Yugoslavia Found and Published between 1940 and
1960), Ljubljana (1963–1986). Category: Roman gentes And from THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tigidio –
Ossia: Grice e Tigidio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tigidio -- For the Tigidii,
there is really one overwhelmingly Gricean candidate: Sextus Tigidius Perennis, praetorian prefect
under Commodus. [GREXv3 | Word] Why?
Because the ancient sources disagree about him. According to the summary you
provide: Herodian and the Historia
Augusta present Perennis as a manipulator who encouraged Commodus to pursue
pleasure and thereby concentrated power in his own hands. [GREXv3 | Word]
Cassius Dio, however, is noticeably more favorable, describing him as a
restraining influence on Commodus and criticizing him chiefly for failing to
defend his colleague Paternus. [GREXv3 | Word]
That is almost a textbook case of what Grice would call the distinction
between: what happened, what is
reported, what is implicated by the report.
A Speranzian vignette: (*)
HISTORICVS A. Perennis rem publicam corrupit. (Perennis corrupted the state.)
HISTORICVS B. Perennis rem publicam continuit. (Perennis held the state
together.) QUAESTOR. Uter verum dicit? (Which one speaks truly?) +>
Different descriptions of the same conduct may encode different evaluations
while referring to the same events. Very
Gricean. There is also a pleasant
connection to your earlier discussion of pax. Perennis allegedly persuaded
Commodus to devote himself to pleasure while he conducted government. [GREXv3 |
Word] One historian's description:
"usurpation of power."
Another's: "maintenance of
stability." The political
vocabulary itself becomes contestable. Just as:
pax may mean negotiated peace or the
condition resulting from victory,
so "guiding the
emperor" may mean wise administration or
manipulation. The lexical item is
less important than the dossier attached to it.
A secondary candidate might be Tigidius Communius simply because of the
striking cognomen Communius. [GREXv3 | Word] For Grice's philosophy of
conversation, communis and common ground are never far away: (*) QUID EST COLLOQUIUM? (What is
conversation?) TIGIDIVS COMMVNIVS. Quaerere quod commune est. (To seek what is
common.) +> Conversation depends upon shared assumptions. But that is admittedly a Speranzian fantasy.
Historically, Perennis is the more substantial figure. A final gloss: The Tigidii contribute a prefect about whom
the sources themselves disagree. Perennis thus becomes an excellent reminder
that historical understanding often requires distinguishing the event from the
description of the event. Grice would have called that the beginning of
philosophical vigilance. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tilgher – Ossia: Grice e
Tilgher: la ragione conversazionale e l’implicatura conversazionale
degl’orecchie dell’aquila – italo-tedesco -- il relativismo filosofico Note
sugli Studi sul teatro moderno. Il Gruppo di Gioco di H. P.
Grice. Adriano Tilgher (Resina, Ercolano, Napoli, Campania): la ragione
conversazionale e l’implicatura conversazionale degl’orecchie dell’aquila – In
Grice’s theory of reason‑governed conversational meaning, what speakers convey
beyond literal sentence meaning is explained through conversational
implicature, which presupposes rational cooperation and an audience capable of
reconstructing the reasons that make an utterance appropriate and intelligible
in context. Adriano Tilgher approaches conversational reason from a more
historical, cultural, and pluralistic angle: his philosophical relativism and
his reflections on style, theatre, and modern culture emphasize that meaning is
never fixed once and for all but always filtered through perspectives, forms of
life, and interpretive stances. Whereas Grice seeks to stabilize conversational
understanding by appealing to general principles of rational cooperation that
underwrite inference across contexts, Tilgher foregrounds the instability and
multiplicity of meanings, suggesting that what is “heard” in discourse—his
metaphorical “eagle’s ears”—depends on the listener’s attunement to competing
forms, values, and historical situations. The comparison thus reveals Grice as
offering a normative, analytic account of how reason governs implicature in
ordinary conversation, while Tilgher represents a critical and relativistic
counterpart, for whom conversational reason is inseparable from cultural
pluralism, stylistic choice, and the contingent conditions that shape how
utterances acquire significance rather than from universal maxims alone. --
italo-tedesco -- il relativismo filosofico – la scuola di Resina --
filosofia campagnese -- filosofia italiana – Grice italo (Resìna). Abstract.
Keywords: le orecchie dell’aquila, lo spccio del bestione trionfante.. Nacque a
Resìna, l’odierna Ercolano, in provincia di Napoli, da Achille, un vetraio di
origine tedesca, e da Rosa Eufrasia Oteau -- cognome ch’è spesso italianizzato
in Ottò. Dopo le scuole elementari, si trasferì a Napoli. Mentre
frequenta il liceo classico Vico conosce Livia De Paolis, che
sposa. In quegli anni T. matura una passione per la filosofia e per
la letteratura, e si avvicina a Croce, che frequenta assiduamente e considera
un vero e proprio maestro, come mostrano i suoi primi lavori. In realtà, non si
tratta di un rapporto destinato a durare a lungo. Dopo la laurea in
giurisprudenza a Napoli, con Salvioli, docente di storia del diritto italiano,
T. vinse un concorso per l’incarico di aiutobibliotecario, e prese servizio
presso la Biblioteca nazionale di Torino -- lettere a Croce, in Carteggio
Croce-Tilgher. Passati i primi mesi, la lontananza dalla sua città e
dai suoi affetti si trasforma in angoscia, e T. chiede aiuto a Croce per
ottenere il trasferimento a una sede più vicina. Dopo mesi di scambi epistolari
incentrati sullo stesso tema – e nei quali T. era divenuto decisamente
pressante – il filosofo interruppe le comunicazioni. È comunque riuscito a
ottenere il trasferimento di T. alla Biblioteca Alessandrina di
Roma, che avvenne. Dal Carteggio risulta, inoltre, che T. non era
puntuale nel rispettare gli impegni editoriali, determinando il disappunto e
l’insofferenza del suo interlocutore, che fa della disciplina una ragione di
vita. Lo stesso T., del resto, si risentì di fronte alle critiche di Croce al
suo Arte, conoscenza e realtà. Croce era convinto – come scrive a Gentile – che
il suo amico avrebbe dovuto dedicarsi alla storia della filosofia per acquisire
quel metodo e quella maturità scientifica. le orecchie dell'aquila, lo spaccio
del bestione trionfante. Grice: Caro
Tilgher, permettimi una curiosità: ma Gentile, quando sentiva quel
"gh" nel tuo cognome, non pensava forse che suonasse un po’ troppo
“unno” per le sue orecchie così raffinate d’italico filosofo? Magari temeva che
ti fossi presentato a Roma con le orecchie dell’aquila e la spada di Attila!
Tilgher: Ah, Grice! In effetti Gentile, col suo spirito tutto latino, mi
guardava come se avessi nidificato aquile in biblioteca invece di libri! Ma ti
confesso che, se proprio devo scegliere, preferisco le “orecchie dell’aquila”
alle orecchie d’asino di certi critici! Grice: Che immagine! Vedi, in
Inghilterra diciamo che chi ha le orecchie troppo grandi sente anche quello che
non dovrebbe... Ma tu, con quelle d’aquila, riuscivi a captare le nuvole del
relativismo e pure i sospiri di Croce quando tardavi con un manoscritto!
Tilgher: Proprio così! Anche se, a volte, sentivo persino la voce del “bestion
trionfante” che mi suggeriva di prendere la vita con un pizzico di ironia. E
poi, caro Grice, meglio un cognome da aquila che una mente da gallina! Tilgher,
Adriano (1921). Studi sul teatro. Roma: Edizioni della Voce
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tillio – Ossia: Grice e
Tillio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tillio. The gens Tillia,
occasionally written Tilia, was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few
members of this gens are mentioned in history, but others are known from
inscriptions.[1] Origin The nomen
Tillius did not originate at Rome, but appears to belong to one of the
languages of northern Italy, such as Umbrian, or the languages of the Picentes
or the Sabines.[2] The nomen is frequently confused with the more common
Tullius, which for this reason is sometimes substituted for it.[3] Praenomina The main praenomina of the Tillii
were Marcus, Lucius, Gaius, and Publius, four of the most common names at all
periods of Roman history. The remainder mostly used other common surnames,
including Publius, Gnaeus, and Titus. The name Decimus is also found in a
filiation. Branches and cognomina The
most famous cognomen of the Tillia gens was Cimber, borne by at least one,
perhaps several members of a family that gained prominence in the Roman state
toward the end of the Republic. This surname originally referred to one of the
Cimbri, a Gaulish or Germanic people who fought against the Romans in Gaul and
Spain at the end of the second century BC.[4] Although such names frequently
indicated the descent of the first bearer, it could also be that the cognomen
was obtained by someone who in appearance or character was thought to resemble
one of the Cimbri. Another family of the
Tillii bore the cognomen Rufus, one of the most common Latin surnames. Meaning
"red" or "reddish", this name was typically bestowed on
someone with red hair, although it might be inherited by a person's descendants
without respect to the actual colour of their hair.[5] Members This list includes abbreviated
praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation. Gnaeus Tillius,
one of the aediles at Arpinum in Latium, responsible for building a tower and
wall, dating between the middle of the second century BC, and the end of the
first.[6] Quintus Tillius Cimber,[i] a legate serving under Caesar during the
Civil War in 48 BC. Caesar sent him, together with Lucius Canuleius, to acquire
grain from Epirus.[7][8] Lucius Tillius Cimber, praetor circa 45 BC, and the
following year one of Caesar's assassins. At first a supporter of Caesar,
Cimber joined the conspiracy against him for reasons that are not entirely
clear. On the day of the murder, Cimber personally obstructed Caesar, first
with a petition, then by seizing his garments, allowing the other assassins to
strike. As governor of Bithynia and Pontus, Cimber raised a fleet,[ii] with
which he supported his fellow conspirators Brutus and Cassius during their
campaign in Macedonia.[10][11][12][13] Tillia Cn. f., buried at Iguvium in
Umbria, in a tomb dating from the latter half of the first century BC.[14]
Lucius Tillius L. l. Dionisius, a freedman buried at Dyrrachium in Macedonia,
in a tomb dating between the middle of the first century BC and the middle of
the first century AD.[15] Tilia C. l. Flora, a freedwoman named in an
inscription from Atina in Latium, along with a freedman and two freedwomen of
the Pomponii, dating between the reign of Augustus and the middle of the first
century AD.[16] Marcus Tillius M. l. Silo, one of several freedmen named in an
inscription from Rome, dating between 5 BC and AD 5.[17] Gaius Tillius L. f.,
buried at Pompeii in Campania, in a family sepulchre built by his grandson,
Lucius Tillius Rufus. His son, Gaius Tillius Rufus, was a duumvir and aedile at
Arpinum, and grandsons Lucius and Gaius Tillius Rufus were military tribunes in
the Legio X Equestris.[18][19] Gaius Tillius C. f. L. n. Rufus, a duumvir and
aedile at Arpinum, was buried at Pompeii, along with his wife, Fadia, father,
Gaius Tillius, and son, Gaius Tillius Rufus, in a family sepulchre built by his
son, Lucius Tillius Rufus. Both sons were military tribunes in the Legio X
Equestris.[18][19] Lucius Tillius C. f. C. n. Rufus, a former military tribune
with the Legio X Equestris, was one of the duumvirs at Pompeii. He built a
family sepulchre for his father, Gaius Cornelius Rufus, who had been duumvir
and aedile at Arpinum; mother, Fadia; grandfather, Gaius Tillius; and brother,
Gaius Tillius Rufus, a military tribune with the Legio X Equestris.[18][19]
Gaius Tillius C. f. C. n. Rufus, a military tribune with the Legio X Equestris,
was buried in a family sepulchre built by his brother, Lucius Tillius Rufus, at
Pompeii, for Gaius, his parents, Gaius Tillius Rufus and Fadia, and
grandfather, Gaius Tillius. His brother was also a military tribune in the same
legion, and later one of the duumvirs of Pompeii, while their father had been
duumvir and aedile at Arpinum.[18][19] Marcus Tillius M. l. Secunus, a freedman
buried at Brundisium in Calabria, aged thirty-five, in a tomb dating between
the late first century BC, and the middle of the first century AD. Gaius
Tillius, buried at Larinum in Samnium, in a tomb built by his son, Lucius
Tillius Trassa, dating from the early first century, along with his wife,
Obinia, son, Gaius Tillius, grandson, Lucius Tillius, and Castrica, perhaps his
granddaughter.[20] Lucius Tillius C. f. Trassa, a centurion, built a tomb at
Larinum, dating from the early first century, for his parents, Gaius Tillius
and Obinia, brother, Gaius Tillius, son, Lucius Tillius, and Castricia, perhaps
his daughter.[20] Gaius Tillius C. f., the son of Gaius Tillius and Obinia,
with whom he was buried in an early first-century tomb at Larinum, built by his
brother, Lucius Tillius Trassa, for their parents, Gaius, his nephew Lucius
Tillius, and Castricia, perhaps his niece.[20] Lucius Tillius L. f. C. n, the
son of Lucius Tillius Trassa, buried in an early first-century family sepulchre
at Larinum, along with his grandparents, Lucius Tillius and Obinia, uncle,
Gaius Tillius, and Castricia, perhaps his sister.[20] Marcus Tillius Blastus,
buried at Casilinum in Campania in a tomb built by Tillia Psyche, dating to the
first half of the first century.[21] Tillia Psyche,[iii] built a tomb at
Casilinum, dating to the first half of the first century, for Marcus Tillius
Blastus.[21] Marcus Tillius, named in an inscription from Rome, dating from the
first half of the first century.[22] Marcus Tillius P. f., built a monument at
Atina to Titus Helvius Basila, who had been aedile, praetor, and governor of
Galatia late in the reign of Tiberius.[23] Tillia, buried at Venafrum in
Samnium, along with Gaius Teius Capito, and Lucius Maius Paetus, in a tomb built
by one of her children, dating from the early or middle part of the first
century.[24] Publius Tillius Dexiades, a freedman, built a sepulchre at Nuceria
in Campania, dating from the early or middle part of the first century, for
himself, his colliberta,[iv] Syrtis, and the freedwoman Harmonia.[25] Tillius,
a potter whose maker's mark was found on a first-century piece of pottery from
Virunum in Noricum.[26] Marcus Tillius Amisenus, buried in a first-century tomb
at Venafrum.[27] Marcus Tillius Eros, named in a first-century inscription from
Venafrum, along with Marcus Tilius Theuda, Felicio, Vitellia Callistes, Tillia
Tertia, Marcus Tillius Gallus, Marcus Tillius Salvius, and Marcus Tillius
Rufus.[28] Marcus Tillius Gallus, named in a first-century inscription from
Venafrum, along with Marcus Tilius Eros, Felicio, Vitellia Callistes, Tillia
Tertia, Marcus Tillius Theuda, Marcus Tillius Salvius, and Marcus Tillius
Rufus.[28] Marcus Tillius [...]mus, buried in a first-century tomb at
Venafrum.[29] Tillia Primulla, the daughter of Nymphodotus, buried in a
first-century tomb at Ammaedara in Africa Proconsularis, aged fifty.[30]
Tillius Faustillus, buried at Cales in Campania, in a first-century tomb built
by Tillia Prisca for herself and Faustillus.[31] Tillia Prisca, built a
first-century tomb at Cales for herself and Tillius Faustillus.[31] Marcus
Tillius Rufus, named in a first-century inscription from Venafrum, along with
Marcus Tilius Eros, Felicio, Vitellia Callistes, Tillia Tertia, Marcus Tillius
Theuda, Marcus Tillius Salvius, and Marcus Tillius Gallus.[28] Titus Tillius T.
f. Sabinus, a centurion in the twelfth Urban Cohort at Rome, named in a
first-century inscription, along with his concubine, Caninia Musa, and
sister-in-law, Postumia Phyllis.[32] Marcus Tillius Salvius, named in a
first-century inscription from Venafrum, along with Marcus Tilius Eros,
Felicio, Vitellia Callistes, Tillia Tertia, Marcus Tillius Theuda, Marcus
Tillius Eros, and Marcus Tillius Rufus.[28] Tillia Tertia, named in a first-century
inscription from Venafrum, along with Marcus Tilius Eros, Felicio, Vitellia
Callistes, Marcus Tillius Theuda, Marcus Tillius Gallus, Marcus Tillius
Salvius, and Marcus Tillius Rufus.[28] Marcus Tillius Theuda, named in a
first-century inscription from Venafrum, along with Marcus Tilius Eros,
Felicio, Vitellia Callistes, Tillia Tertia, Marcus Tillius Gallus, Marcus
Tillius Salvius, and Marcus Tillius Rufus.[28] Publius Tillius P. l. Dioscurus,
one of the Seviri Augustales, buried at Aeclanum in Samnium, in the middle part
of the first century.[33] Gaius Tillius M. f. Vital[...], a soldier buried in a
mid-first-century tomb at Hasta in Liguria.[34] Quintus Tillius Eryllus, one of
the officials at Larinum in Samnium, in an inscription dating from the middle or
later part of the first century, along with Tillius Sassius, perhaps the member
of the Arval Brethren.[35] Tilia, dedicated a tomb at Valentia in Sardinia,
dating from the latter half of the first century, for her husband, I[...]us
Barecis, aged fifty-one.[36] Quintus Tillius Sassius, a magistrate of the Arval
Brethren at Rome, named in inscriptions dating from AD 62 to 91. He might be
the same person named along with Quintus Tillius Eryllus in an inscription from
Larinum.[37][35][38] Lucius Tillius L. f. R[...], buried in a first- or
second-century tomb at the present site of Montaquila, formerly part of
Samnium, along with his wife, Maia Prisca.[39] Quintus Tillius Figulianus,
buried in a tomb at Rome, dating between the middle of the first century and
the middle of the second, built by Magnia Tyche for herself, Figulianus, Titus
Magnius Anicetus, and Titus Magnius Euthychus.[40] Tillia M. l. Stacte, a
freedwoman named in an inscription from Rome, dating between the middle of the
first century and the middle of the second.[41] Tillius D. l. Tertius, a
freedman named along with his colliberta, Athenais, in an inscription from Rome
dating between the middle of the first century and the middle of the
second.[42] Tillia Bremusa, buried at Rome, in a tomb built by Marcus Furius
Charito, dating between the middle of the first century, and the end of the
second.[43] Marcus Tillius Celerianus, a youth buried at Rome, aged fourteen,
in a tomb built by his mother, Tillia Philomene, dating between the late first century
and the middle of the second.[44] Tillia Philomene, built a tomb at Rome,
dating between the late first century and the middle of the second, for her
son, Marcus Tillius Celerianus.[44] Tillia Q. f. Faustina, built a
second-century tomb at Venafrum for her father, Quintus Tillius Faustus.[45]
Quintus Tillius Faustus, buried in a second-century tomb at Venafrum, built by
his daughter, Tillia Faustina.[45] Tillia Sarnia, the wife of Quintus Cassius
Januarius, and mother of Quintus Cassius Martialis and Cassia Ostiensia. Her
daughter built a second-century family sepulchre at Ostia for herself, her
parents, and her brother.[46] Lucius Tillius Restitutus, one of the
quattuorviri at Aesernia in Samnium, in an uncertain year during the reign of
Antoninus Pius.[47] Tillia Eleusina, a freedwoman, built a tomb at Rome, dating
from the middle part of the second century, for her husband, Quintus Tillius
Verecundus.[48] Quintus Tillius Verecundus, buried in a mid-second-century tomb
at Rome, built by his wife, the freedwoman Tillia Eleusina.[48] Marcus Tillius
Januarius, dedicated a tomb at Rufrae in Samnium, dating from the middle or
later part of the second century, for his wife, Herennia Afrodisia.[49] Tilius,
built a tomb at Ammaedara in Africa Proconsularis for his daughter, Tilia
Concordia, dating between the middle of the second century and the middle of
the third. He might be the same Tilius buried along with Concordia.[50] Tilia
Concordia, buried at Ammaedara, aged seventeen years, thirty days, in a tomb built
by her father, Tilius, dating between the middle of the second century and the
middle of the third.[50] Tillia Eutychia, buried at Venafrum in Samnium, in a
tomb built by Tillius Primus, dating between the middle of the second century
and the middle of the third.[51] Tillius Primus, built a tomb at Venafrum,
dating between the middle of the second century and the middle of the third,
for Tillia Eutychia.[51] Marcus Tillius M. f. Rufus, a native of Atina, was a
centurion primus pilus, who had served in the twelfth urban cohort, the first
cohort of the vigiles, the Legio XX Valeria Victrix and the Legio XXII
Primigenia, named in inscriptions from Atina in AD 208, and Mogontiacum in
Germania Superior in 213.[52] Tillius, named in a fourth-century inscription
from Rome.[53] Undated Tillii Tiliia, built a tomb at Atina for her husband,
Marcus Aerius.[54] Tillia, dedicated a monument at Atina for Marcus
Vibul[...].[55] Tilius, buried at Forum Julii in Gallia Narbonensis.[56]
Tillius, one of the heirs of Opidius, according to an inscription from
Rome.[57] Lucius Tillius, named in an inscription from Nomentum in Latium.[58]
Lucius Tillius, named in an inscription from Interamna Lirenas in Latium.[59]
Tillius Bassus, built a tomb at Rome for his infant daughter, Felicissima, aged
one year, eight months, and ten days.[60] Gaius Tillius C. l. Cali[...], a
freedman buried in a sepulchre built by the freedman Gaius Tillius Sabda at
Atina for himself, Cali[...], and the freedwoman Tillia Hetaera.[61] Tilius
Canpanus, buried at Rusicade in Numidia, aged twenty-three.[62] Tillia Ɔ. l
Chelido, a freedwoman, dedicated a sepulchre at Atina for the family of the
freedman Paccius.[63] Marcus Tillius M. f. For[...], named in a sepulchral
inscription from Atina.[64] Tillia C. l. Hetaera, a freedwoman buried in a
sepulchre at Atina, built by the freedman Gaius Tillius Sabda for himself,
Hetaera, and the freedman Gaius Tillius Cali[...].[61] Gnaeus Tillius Hym[...],
built a tomb at Casinum in Latium for Lucceia Saturni[...].[65] Tilius Impetratus,
buried at Ammaedara, aged thirty-five, along with his young daughter, Tilia
Stercula.[66] Tillia M. l. Lucceia, named in a sepulchral inscription from
Rome, along with Marcus Tillius Phanias.[67] Tilia Materona, buried in a family
sepulchre at Madaurus in Africa Proconsularis, aged twenty-three, along with
Otacilia Bella, aged sixty-six. The tomb might have been built by Otacilia
Kasta and Otacilius Titor, or they might also be buried there.[68] Tillia Cn.
f. Paulla, buried at Narbo in Gallia Narbonensis, along with Titus Sertorius
Turpio.[69] Marcus Tillius M. l. Phanias, named in a sepulchral inscription
from Rome, along with Tillia Lucceia.[67] Tilia Prepusa, a little girl buried
at Rome, aged six.[70] Tillia M. l. Prima, a freedwoman buried at Aquinum in
Latium, along with the freedman and Sevir, Statius Vibius Andricus, apparently
her husband.[71] Publius Tillius T. f. Quintio, named in an inscription from
Carteia in Hispania Baetica.[72] Lucius Tillius L. f. R[...], named in an
inscription from Volturnum in Campania, along with his wife, Maia Prisca.[73]
Gaius Tillius C. l. Sabda, a freedman, dedicated a tomb at Atina for himself,
the freedman Gaius Tillius Cali[...], and the freedwoman Tillia Hetaera.[61]
Tilia C. f. Secunda, buried at Ateste in Venetia and Histria.[74] Tilia
Stercula, a little girl buried at Ammaedara, aged four, along with her father,
Tilius Impetratus.[66] Tilius Terentianus, named in an inscription from
Rome.[75] Notes So named in Magistrates
of the Roman Republic, but unclear whether he is thought to be the brother of
Lucius who was expelled from the senate and exiled; Pauly-Wissowa does not
assign him a surname, or consider him the brother. According to the letters of the so-called
Pseudo-Brutus to Cicero, Cimber inflicted a defeat upon the consul
Dolabella.[9] Spelled
"Phsuche" in the original.
Colliberta: a woman freed on the same occasion (as Dexiades). See also
List of Roman gentes References PW,
"Tillius". Chase, p. 129. Nicolaus Damascenus, The Life of Augustus,
24. Cassell's Latin and English
Dictionary, s.v. Cimber. Chase, p. 110. CIL X, 5682. Caesar, De Bello Civili, iii. 42. Broughton, vol. II, p. 282. Pseudo-Brutus, i. 6. Cicero, Philippicae, ii. 11. Ad
Familiares, vi. 12. Seneca, De Ira, iii.
30; Epistulae, lxxxiii. 11. Appian,
Bellum Civile, iv. 102, 105. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 307, 330, 349, 366. CIL XI, 5904.
AE 2009, 1249. AE 1981, 215. AE 1964, 74a.
CIL
X, 8148. Borelli, Un Impegno per Pompei,
17OS. AE 1997, 365. Ephemeris Epigraphica, viii. 1, 504. CIL VI, 33659. CIL X, 5057.
CIL X, 4997. AE 1982, 180. Gerstl, Supplementum Epigraphicum, 208. CIL X, 5002.
CIL X, 5004. CIL X, 5001. AE 2013, 1974. CIL X, 4367.
CIL VI, 32734. CIL IX, 1197. CIL V, 7559.
CIL IX, 2827. Corda, Iscrizioni
latine della Sardegna, 634. CIL VI,
2043. AE 2013, 390. CIL IX, 6818.
CIL VI, 21852. CIL VI,
33660. CIL VI, 5478. CIL VI, 27418. AE 1977, 72.
CIL X, 5003. CIL XIV, 780. CIL IX, 2655.
AE 1988, 151. AE 2014, 331. AE 2013, 2002. CIL X, 4889.
CIL X, 5064, CIL XIII, 6762. ICUR,
iv. 10976b. CIL X, 5115. CIL X, 5123.
CIL XII, 310. Rivista di
Archeologia Cristiana, 1926-46. CIL XIV,
3986. AE 1988, 247. CIL VI, 17802. CIL X, 5114.
CIL VIII, 8613. CIL X, 5112. CIL X, 5113. CIL X, 5259.
Wilmanns, Inscriptiones Africae Latinae, 176,9. CIL VI, 27417. Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie,
2646. CIL XII, 5135. CIL VI, 27419. CIL X, 5424.
CIL II, 1930. AE 2002, 393. Pais, Supplementa Italica, 548. CIL VI, 13210. Bibliography Marcus Tullius
Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares, Philippicae. Gaius Julius Caesar, Commentarii
de Bello Civili (Commentaries on the Civil War). Nicolaus
Damascenus, The Life of Augustus. Lucius Annaeus Seneca (Seneca the Younger),
De Ira (On Anger); Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium (Moral Letters to Lucilius).
Appianus Alexandrinus (Appian), Bellum Civile (The Civil War). Theodor Mommsen
et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (The Body of Latin Inscriptions,
abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften
(1853–present). Giovanni Battista de Rossi, Inscriptiones Christianae Urbis
Romanae Septimo Saeculo Antiquiores (Christian Inscriptions from Rome of the
First Seven Centuries, abbreviated ICUR), Vatican Library, Rome (1857–1861,
1888). Wilhelm Henzen, Ephemeris Epigraphica: Corporis Inscriptionum Latinarum
Supplementum (Journal of Inscriptions: Supplement to the Corpus Inscriptionum
Latinarum, abbreviated EE), Institute of Roman Archaeology, Rome (1872–1913).
Gustav Wilmanns, Inscriptiones Africae Latinae (Latin Inscriptions from
Africa), Georg Reimer, Berlin (1881). Ettore Pais, Corporis Inscriptionum
Latinarum Supplementa Italica (Italian Supplement to the Corpus Inscriptionum
Latinarum), Rome (1884). René Cagnat et alii, L'Année épigraphique (The Year in
Epigraphy, abbreviated AE), Presses Universitaires de France (1888–present).
August Pauly, Georg Wissowa, et alii, Realencyclopädie der Classischen
Altertumswissenschaft (Scientific Encyclopedia of the Knowledge of Classical
Antiquities, abbreviated RE or PW), J. B. Metzler, Stuttgart (1894–1980).
George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman Praenomina", in Harvard Studies
in Classical Philology, vol. VIII, pp. 103–184 (1897). Anna Gerstl,
Supplementum Epigraphicum zu CIL III für Kärnten und Osttirol (Epigraphic
Supplement to CIL III for Carinthia and East Tyrol), Vienna, (1902–1961). Stéphane Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie (Latin Inscriptions from
Algeria), Edouard Champion, Paris (1922–present). Rivista di
Archeologia Cristiana (Journal of Christian Archaeology), Pontificia Commissio
de Sacra Archaeologia, Rome (1924–present). T. Robert S.
Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, American Philological
Association (1952–1986). D.P. Simpson, Cassell's Latin and English Dictionary,
Macmillan Publishing Company, New York (1963). Licia Vlad Borelli,
Un Impegno per Pompei, Mailand (1983). Antonio M. Corda, Concordanze delle
iscrizioni latine della Sardegna (Concordance of the Latin Inscriptions of
Sardinia, abbreviated SRD), Ortacesus (2014). Category:
Roman gentes And from THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tillio – Ossia: Grice
e Tillio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tillio. For the
Tillii, there is one figure who almost compels a Gricean treatment: Lucius Tillius Cimber, one of Caesar's
assassins. [GREXv3 | Word] The reason is
not merely historical but conversational. According to the tradition summarized
in your material, on the Ides of March it is Cimber who initiates the final
approach to Caesar: he presents a
petition, he physically detains Caesar, he seizes or pulls at Caesar's garment,
thereby creating the opening for the others to strike. [GREXv3 | Word] In modern speech-act terms, a petition is
supposed to be: a request. But in the conspiracy it functions as: a signal.
The overt act and the intended act diverge. A Grice-Speranza vignette
almost writes itself: (*) CIMBER.
Libellum porrigo. (I present a petition.) CAESAR. Quid petis? (What do you
ask?) CIMBER. Aliud ostendo, aliud ago. (I display one act, I perform another.)
+> The publicly avowed purpose of an utterance need not coincide with its
operative function. That is very close
to Grice's distinction between what an utterance says and what it is used to
accomplish. The name "Cimber"
The cognomen is itself interesting. As your source notes, Cimber originally
referred to one of the Cimbri, the northern people who famously fought Rome.
The cognomen might indicate ancestry, appearance, or merely a perceived
resemblance. [GREXv3 | Word] That gives a second Gricean theme: descriptive origin versus inherited
designation. By Caesar's day,
"Cimber" is functioning as a name regardless of whether the bearer
has any connection with the actual Cimbri. A familiar Speranzian problem: When does a description stop describing and
start naming? And a special connection
with Grice You mention Grice's fascination with finis. Interestingly, Cimber
appears in precisely the sort of world that obsessed Cicero, Caesar, and later
Grice: petitions, intentions, political
representation, public acts whose apparent purpose differs from their effective
purpose. The assassination scene is
almost the inverse of the Apsus parley. At Apsus: conversation appears genuine and turns into
violence. With Cimber: a petition appears conversational but is
already violence in preparation. A
second candidate If I were compiling Grice e Speranza: Tillii, I would at least
mention Quintus Tillius Cimber, Caesar's legate sent to acquire grain in Epirus
during the Civil War. [GREXv3 | Word] For Grice, the notion of a legate is
philosophically rich: one person
speaking and acting for another. Just as
in your discussion of Vatinius and Labienus, a collective or commander cannot
literally converse with every relevant party; a representative does so on his
behalf. Speranza's gloss The Tillii contribute the most famous petition
in Roman history. Tillius Cimber approached Caesar ostensibly as a petitioner.
The petition was genuine as an utterance, but not as a purpose. Philosophers of
language call this a divergence between apparent and operative function. Romans
called it the Ides of March. [GREXv3 | Word] Indeed, and I think Abbott makes
fun of the tragic incident, implying that Cimber was about to fall, and grabbed
Giulio's toga, pushing it down. Indeed, for Grice, the act here is between
Cimber and the other conspirators -- but one wonders how much precision was
needed. The time was set -- the occasion was there -- the will was there --
Cimber provides a distraction, more than a 'signal' proper --. In contingency
planning, had NOT Cimber trembled and grabbed Giulio's toga down, the
conspirators WOULD STILL HAVE ATTACKED one would suppose. It would have been a
total change of scenario that could have prevented Giulio's death -- say, the
pretorian guard running to Giulio when they see Cimber approaching -- and thus
paralysing the conpirators. If it was planned, there is Griceian meaning -- if
it just occurred to Cimber to offer the petition and the conspirators found the
distraction opportune it is another thing -- Plus, how would we know? Unless
you are inside Cimber's 'head' how do we know what he 'meant' if anything? From
a prae-historic Peirceian perspective on which Grice bases his analysis of
communication, the 'sign' here by Cimber is addressed to the conspirators -- so
the triadic becomes tetradic -- 'He is distracted' being the content of the
message intended by Cimber to be communicated to the conspirators, by grabbing
the toga: the four elements S(1, 2, 3, 4) of significare then being,
toga-grabbing (the sign itself), 'that Giulio is distracted' -- the content or
semantic of the sign --; the signifier meaning he who signifies, Cimber, and
the addressee or interpretant, the conspirators. Thanks Yes, and this is
precisely where a Gricean analysis becomes delicate. What we know from the
historical tradition is fairly modest. Lucius Tillius Cimber approached Julius
Caesar with a petition and then seized or pulled at his garment, whereupon the
attack began. The sources describe the physical sequence, but they do not give
us direct access to Cimber's intentions. [GREXv3 | Word] Grice would insist on
the distinction between: what happened,
what was intended, what was understood.
These are three different questions. The stronger Gricean reading The
classic Gricean reconstruction is:
Cimber pulls the toga intending the conspirators to recognize that the
moment for action has arrived. Then we
have something like genuine non-verbal meaning. In Grice's idiom: Cimber intends the conspirators to recognize
his intention, and intends that recognition to help produce their
response. That looks very close to
meaningful signaling. The weaker reading
Your alternative seems equally plausible. Suppose: the conspiracy is already fixed, everybody
knows the time and place, everybody is armed and waiting, everybody is
committed. Then the toga-pull need not
function as a signal at all. It may simply function as: distraction, obstruction, physical
positioning. The conspirators were going
to attack anyway. In that case the act is more tactical than communicative. The
difference is crucial. A cavalry officer raising a flag because it is the
agreed signal: communication. A cavalry officer tripping the enemy
commander: tactics. Cimber's gesture may contain elements of
both. Peirce and the tetradic version
Your Peircean formulation is attractive. One could represent it as: Sign vehicle: toga-grabbing. Object/content:
"Caesar is now vulnerable" or "the moment has arrived."
Interpreter: the conspirators. Sign-user: Cimber. That yields the tetradic structure you
propose. But notice what Grice would immediately ask: Did Cimber intend the conspirators to
recognize the act as a sign? If yes, we
have Gricean meaning. If no, then the conspirators merely exploit an observable
event. The epistemological problem And
here your strongest point appears: How
would we know? Precisely. Grice's theory
ultimately depends upon intentions. But intentions are not directly observable.
We infer them from: prior planning,
conventions, testimony, circumstances.
We are not "inside Cimber's head." Therefore we cannot simply
read meaning off the physical action. The action underdetermines the intention.
A very Gricean conclusion would be: The
toga-pull is certainly evidence. Whether it was a signal, a distraction, a
spontaneous movement, or some combination of the three depends upon an
attribution of intention that no surviving source can conclusively verify. Abbott's comic version Abbott's theatrical
suggestion, that Cimber effectively stumbles, grabs the toga, and nearly brings
it down by accident, is philosophically useful because it shows how little the
physical movement itself determines the meaning. Exactly the same bodily motion
could be interpreted as: accident,
nervousness, tactical distraction, pre-arranged signal, assault. The observable event remains constant. The
attributed intention changes. That is almost a textbook Gricean lesson. As
Speranza might put it: The conspirators
needed Caesar distracted; they did not necessarily need Cimber's gesture to
mean that Caesar was distracted. The event could function causally without
functioning communicatively. The philosopher's problem begins when we ask
whether the conspirators acted because Caesar's attention was diverted or
because they recognized Cimber's intention that they should act. That is where
tactics ends and meaning begins.
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Timpanaro – Ossia: Grice
e Timpanaro: la ragione conversazionale -- filosofia italiana. Note sugli Studi di filologia e storia. Il Gruppo di Gioco di H. P.
Grice, Sebastiano Timpanaro (Parma) junior: la ragione conversazionale -- In
Grice’s theory of reason‑governed conversational meaning, what a speaker
communicates beyond the literal content of an utterance is explained through
implicature, derived from the assumption that interlocutors are rational agents
cooperating according to shared norms that make an utterance intelligible as a
reasonable move in conversation. Sebastiano Timpanaro approaches an analogous
problem from the side of philology and historical criticism: his work on
textual transmission, on Lehmann’s method, and on Leopardi is guided by the idea
that meaning emerges from disciplined attention to material detail, error, and
correction, rather than from idealized intentional coherence alone. Where Grice
emphasizes rational inference by hearers reconstructing speaker intentions
under conversational principles, Timpanaro stresses the limits of intentional
control, showing how meaning is shaped by objective constraints, mechanical
mistakes, and historical processes that escape conscious design. The comparison
thus highlights Grice as developing a normative theory of conversational
rationality focused on inference and cooperation in living discourse, while
Timpanaro represents a materialist and historically grounded counterpart, in
which rational understanding depends less on ideal conversational maxims than
on a critical method that accounts for the concrete conditions under which
texts and meanings are produced, transmitted, and sometimes distorted. Grice: I
like him. Leopardi. Filosofo -- è stato un filologo classico, saggista e
critico letterario italiano. M. Firenze. Lapide che commemora le vicine
case di Pisa dove vissero T. senior, Maria Timpanaro Cardini e
T. junior -- Pisa, via San Paolo. Figlio di T. senior e di Maria
Timpanaro Cardini, studia a Firenze col celebre filologo classico PASQUALI
(vedasi, membro tra l'altro dell'Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei e della British
Academy. Scelse di rifiutare la carriera di insegnamento universitario, senza
tuttavia rinunciare a un'attività scientifica davvero imponente, indirizzata
verso la filologia latina, la letteratura italiana e alcuni grandi temi
filosofici: il marxismo, il materialismo e la psicoanalisi freudiana.
S'impegna anche in politica, militando inizialmente nella sinistra interna del
Partito Socialista Italiano; aderì al Psiup e al Pdup. In seguito, rimanendo
coerente con le sue idee leniniste, guarda con interesse al progetto di
Rifondazione Comunista, senza però mai iscriversi al partito. È sepolto nel
Cimitero Monumentale della Misericordia dell'Antella, Comune di Bagno a Ripoli,
provincia di Firenze. Timpanaro e Lachmann Nella fondamentale monografia
La genesi del metodo del Lachmann, T. ripercorre i lineamenti di storia della filologia,
con particolare riferimento alle molteplici intuizioni e agli spunti che hanno
preceduto l'opera di Lachmann e a cui lo studioso tedesco aveva poi dato una
sistematica e organica formulazione; ancor oggi il cosiddetto metodo di
Lachmann, pur rivisitato nel corso dei decenni, rimane basilare per approntare
l'edizione critica di un testo, soprattutto di un autore latino o greco.
Timpanaro e L'infinito In un articolo intitolato Di alcune falsificazioni di
scritti leopardiani, T. ha fornito la dimostrazione che i tre abbozzi de
L'infinito di LEOPARDI , pubblicati in Tutte le opere, a cura di Francesco
Flora, Milano, Mondadori Editore, sono in realtà dei falsi. Opere La
filologia di Leopardi, Firenze, Le Monnier.
G: “Timpanaro begins in 1945 with Ennius. That is a
good age at which to begin: young enough for audacity, old enough for
footnotes.” S: “And under bombs, more or less.” G: “Yes. Other men grabbed
rifles; the Italians grabbed fragments.” S: “That is unfair.” G: “Only if one
thinks Ennius less worth rescuing than Europe. Timpanaro seems to have thought
the two enterprises adjacent.” S: “You are in a mood.” G: “Philology encourages
it. One is always told one is doing something merely preparatory, and then one
discovers that civilisation hangs from a damaged line in Nonius.” S: “So
Timpanaro in 1945 writes Per una nuova edizione critica di Ennio. The very title sounds half modest, half insurgent.” G: “Exactly. ‘Per
una nuova edizione’ means, in polite Italian, ‘the old one will no longer do.’”
S: “And the old one was Vahlen.” G: “Vahlen as institution, yes. The great
post-Lachmannian comfort blanket. Admirable, indispensable, and by then
intolerably old.” S: “So Pasquali sees the need, Timpanaro feels the need,
Mariotti writes letters about the need, and eventually Skutsch does the deed.”
G: “That is the international division of labour. Florence diagnoses, Oxford
publishes.” S: “Skutsch was at Oxford?” G: “Eventually. German by origin,
British by appointment, Oxford by immortality. Which is fitting, since Ennius
belongs to that awkward zone where nationality is already a commentary.” S:
“And Mariotti?” G: “Mariotti matters because he was not merely a bystander. He
was the nearest thing Timpanaro had to a fellow campaigner in the Italian line.
They wrote to one another about Ennius the way dons write about weather if the
weather determined the fate of Rome.” S: “And neither of them, strictly, a
philosopher.” G: “No. But strictness is often the enemy of insight.” S: “Then
let us be unstrict. What does an analytic philosopher make of Timpanaro,
Pasquali, Terzaghi, Mariotti, and this poor shredded Ennius?” G: “He sees a
rational practice. That is already enough.” S: “You mean: evidence, inference,
correction, and no metaphysical fog?” G: “Quite. Timpanaro would have liked the
phrase ‘no metaphysical fog,’ though he would probably have added a polemic against
psychoanalysis before tea.” S: “And Ennius?” G: “Ennius is the delicious case.
Officially a poet. Actually a small republic of genres.” S: “Annales,
tragedies, satires.” G: “And more. Epicharmus. Euhemerus. Protrepticus. A poet
who refuses to remain only a poet.” S: “Then he really is philosophically
tempting.” G: “Very. Because he stands before philosophy ‘arrives at Rome’ in
the pompous textbook way, and yet he is already importing cosmology, theology,
exhortation, and reflective anthropology.” S: “Before Carneades, before the
embassy, before the harbour scene.” G: “Exactly. Before philosophy is seen to
dock, Ennius is already smuggling it inland.” S: “That is rather good.” G: “It
is also true.” S: “And Timpanaro knows this?” G: “Of course. That is why Ennius
matters to him beyond mere text. A fragmentary author tests not only
scholarship but judgement.” S: “Because every editorial decision is an
argument?” G: “And every argument is half philology, half philosophy, if the
text is sufficiently broken.” S: “So Grice, or rather G., reading Timpanaro,
does not say, ‘Ah yes, another textual chap.’ He says, ‘Here is a man deciding
what counts as evidence.’” G: “Yes. And further: here is a man deciding what
counts as the same work, the same line, the same authorial intention under
ruin.” S: “That sounds almost like philosophy of language.” G: “It is
philosophy of language without the vanity of calling itself that.” S: “And
Pasquali?” G: “Pasquali is the great elder pressure. He sees that Vahlen must
be superseded, and he sees in the young Timpanaro the possible editor of
Ennius.” S: “A kind of appointed avenger.” G: “Or appointed cleaner. Editors
spend half their lives tidying after dead men and the other half deciding which
dirt is authentic.” S: “Terzaghi comes in as relatore.” G: “Yes. Formal
supervisor, one might say. Pasquali the true formative force, Terzaghi the
official seal. That is a very academic arrangement.” S: “And Mariotti the
correspondent.” G: “The living marginalia.” S: “You make them sound like a
quartet.” G: “They are a quartet, with Ennius as the absent fifth player and
Vahlen as the dead conductor.” S: “And Skutsch?” G: “Skutsch is the late
soloist who finally records the symphony.” S: “Do you think Timpanaro minded?”
G: “He minded in the only honourable way: by writing on Skutsch as one editor
of Ennius speaking to another.” S: “Not nationalist resentment, then.” G: “No.
More refined than that. A sense that one had long inhabited the same problem
and had not been the man to close it.” S: “Which is almost sad.” G: “Philology
is mostly sadness arranged as method.” S: “And still you say an analytic
philosopher should admire it.” G: “Certainly. Because it disciplines the
imagination. One cannot merely suppose. One must show why a conjecture deserves
to live.” S: “That is not unlike your own habits.” G: “I should hope not.
Though I have fewer manuscripts and more undergraduates.” S: “Let us talk
Ennius proper, then. If he is not merely the annalist, what philosophical
content do G. and S. find?” G: “Begin with Euhemerus.” S: “The rationalising of
the gods.” G: “Yes. Gods as exalted mortals, founders, benefactors, rulers made
divine by memory.” S: “That is already philosophy of religion, or at least myth
under criticism.” G: “Indeed. One can hear Hume yawning in advance.” S: “And
Epicharmus?” G: “That is subtler. Cosmological, quasi-physical, with
reflections on soul and body and the operations of nature. Fragmentary enough
to allow irresponsibility, but not so fragmentary that one may say anything one
likes.” S: “So exactly the sort of text Timpanaro would relish.” G: “Because it
forces one to distinguish reconstruction from invention.” S: “And
Protrepticus?” G: “A philosophical genre by title alone. Exhortation. The very
idea that poetry may urge one toward a mode of life or thought rather than
merely recount events.” S: “So Ennius already contains the possibility that
poetry thinks.” G: “And that is where the philosophers become interested.” S:
“Even if condescendingly.” G: “Especially if condescendingly. Philosophers love
border cases because they allow one to be generous without yielding the
border.” S: “What would G. say, reading one of the famous lines?” G: “He would
choose one that sounds like Rome announcing itself before it knows what Rome
is.” S: “Such as?” G: “Moribus antiquis res stat Romana virisque.” S: “The
Roman commonwealth stands by ancient customs and by men.” G: “Exactly. It is
almost proverb, almost philosophy, almost constitutional theory.” S: “And
entirely Ennius.” G: “And entirely why a philosopher cannot simply shrug and
say ‘mere poet.’” S: “Though he might try.” G: “He might. But the line persists
because it compresses a political anthropology into verse.” S: “So Grice, with
Lit. Hum., hears not only metre but doctrine.” G: “He hears a maxim. A Roman
maxim before philosophy properly institutionalises maxims.” S: “And Timpanaro
hears a textual problem.” G: “And both are right.” S: “That is annoyingly
harmonious.” G: “The best disagreements usually are.” S: “Would G. admire
Timpanaro’s materialism?” G: “He would admire the refusal to sentimentalise
intention. Timpanaro keeps reminding one that texts travel through blunders,
slips, contamination, false piety, editorial violence.” S: “Which is a salutary
pressure on any clean theory of meaning.” G: “Yes. It says: authorial intention
is not sovereign over transmission.” S: “So even if Grice begins with
intention, Timpanaro forces him to add vehicle, medium, and damage.” G:
“Exactly. Timpanaro is what happens when the post brings bad news to philosophy
of language.” S: “And Mariotti?” G: “Mariotti shows that this was not one
lonely young genius with Ennius, but a whole postwar Italian philological
conversation.” S: “Conducted, as you say, like dons rather than soldiers.” G:
“Quite. While others defend Europe materially, they defend its fragments.” S:
“That sounds almost indecent.” G: “Civilisation is indecently layered. Someone
must keep the footnotes alive while others keep the lights on.” S: “And
Oxford?” G: “Oxford would call it classical scholarship and imagine it as part
of civilised education.” S: “Whereas for the Italians it is their own deep
history.” G: “That is the crucial point. For Timpanaro and Mariotti, Ennius is
not merely a Latin author in a syllabus. He is part of how Italy, and Rome, and
antiquity became available as a self-history.” S: “So Timpanaro’s fight for a
post-Vahlen edition is not antiquarian fussing.” G: “No. It is a claim about
what deserves to be transmitted correctly.” S: “And G., as analytic
philosopher, sees in that not mere piety but a logic of preservation.” G: “Yes.
A practice in which evidence, norm, and responsibility converge.” S: “You make
philology sound almost noble.” G: “It is noble. It is merely dressed badly.” S:
“Can one say that Ennius is philosophically important before Roman philosophy
arrives in the textbook sense?” G: “One must say exactly that.” S: “Even if the
textbooks prefer Appius Claudius Caecus or later Lucretius.” G: “Textbooks
always prefer clean beginnings. History prefers smudges.” S: “And Ennius is a
smudge.” G: “A magnificent one.” S: “Then why do they keep calling him a poet?”
G: “Because classification is how disciplines protect their furniture.” S: “And
yet his corpus keeps spilling over.” G: “Tragedy, satire, epic, theology, protreptic.
He refuses to stay shelved.” S: “Which is why Timpanaro had to fight for him.”
G: “Yes. A genius in fragments is always in danger of becoming a mere quarry
for quotations unless someone restores proportion.” S: “And Vahlen, admirable
though he was, could no longer do that.” G: “No. Vahlen had become a monument.
Monuments are indispensable and impossible to inhabit.” S: “Skutsch then builds
the habitable edition.” G: “And Timpanaro reviews it like a man walking through
a house he once hoped to build.” S: “That is nearly moving.” G: “Philology
becomes moving when one remembers that behind every ‘review’ there may be forty
years of unspent editorial ambition.” S: “Would G. envy them?” G: “In a way.
Philosophers rarely have such clear objects. Ennius, at least, is definitely
there, though mostly missing.” S: “Whereas philosophers have texts and still
cannot agree what they mean.” G: “Exactly. Ennius is fragmentary in body.
Philosophy is fragmentary in spirit.” S: “And the punchline?” G: “That the poet
turns out more philosophical than the philosophers expected, and the
philologists more philosophical than the philosophers admit.” S: “And
Rome?” G: “Still standing, apparently, on ancient customs, on men, and on
editors.”GRICE: Caro Timpanaro, lasciami cominciare con una domanda che mi
frulla in testa: ma tu, quando correggi un manoscritto latino, non ti viene mai
la tentazione di aggiungere qualche battuta spiritosa tra le righe? Così, per
movimentare un po’ la filologia… TIMPANARO: Ah Grice, se solo avessi osato! Ma
sai, se avessi scritto qualcosa di spassoso su un codice di Virgilio, i miei
colleghi sarebbero diventati più severi di Lachmann con una variante spurie.
Però confesso: a volte sostituirei volentieri qualche verso con un paradosso
leopardiano. GRICE: Ecco, sapevo che Leopardi sarebbe saltato fuori! Dimmi la
verità: tu ti senti più vicino all’infinito di Leopardi o alla “finitezza” dei
manoscritti, dove persino una virgola conta come se fosse una legge fisica?
TIMPANARO: Per Leopardi l’infinito era una siepe, per me spesso è una pila di
varianti testuali che non finisce mai! Ma, tra noi, la vera felicità è trovare
una lectio difficilior che resista a ogni tentazione filologica… un po’ come
resistere a una battuta ironica durante un convegno serio. GRICE: Allora
dovremmo fondare una scuola: “La ragione conversazionale della critica
testuale!” Regola numero uno: ogni volta che un editore commette una
falsificazione leopardiana, si brinda con vino toscano e si ride per almeno
dieci minuti! TIMPANARO: Accetto! Ma lasciami aggiungere la regola due: chi
trova un falso in Leopardi può scegliere la musica di sottofondo durante la riunione
— ma solo se è Rossini. Sai, un po’ di leggerezza non guasta mai neppure in
filologia! Timpanaro, Sebastiano junior (1945). Per una nuova edizione critica
pot-Vahlen degl’Annali d’Ennio. Sotto Pasquale e Terzaghi. Lettere. Firenze.
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tineio – Ossia: Grice e
Tineio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tineio. The gens Tineia
was a Roman family of imperial times. Members of this gens first appear in
history in the time of Hadrian; the first to obtain the consulship was Quintus
Tineius Rufus in AD 127. Origin The
Tineii of the second and third centuries lived at Side, in Pamphylia. They may
have been an old Roman family that had migrated to Asia Minor, where Italian
migrants had settled since the first century BC; however, it was not uncommon
for men from the Eastern Mediterranean, without any connection with Italy, to
reach the Roman nobility in this period. For example, Arrian, a Greek, was
consul circa AD 132, and Marcus Julius Philippus, a native of Arabia Petraea,
became emperor in 244. A funerary
monument from Rome identifies one of the Tineii as a member of the tribus Sabatina,
corresponding with the region of Sabinum; this may imply that the Tineii were
originally a Sabine family, although the man who built it was a native of
Nicomedia in Bithynia.[1] Nomina ending in -eius were common under the
Republic, and frequently belonged to families of Sabine origin.[2] Praenomina The main praenomen of the Tineii
was Quintus, which the Tineii Rufi used to the exclusion of all others; in this
family the praenomen was fossilized, and passed down to all of the sons in the
family, with no distinguishing function; instead the sons would typically be
distinguished by their surnames. Different praenomina are occasionally found
among the other Tineii, including Lucius, Marcus, and Gaius; like Quintus,
these were among the most common names throughout Roman history. Branches and cognomina The only distinct
family of the Tineii bore the cognomen Rufus, red. This was a common surname,
typically given to those who had red hair.[3] Several members of this family
bore additional cognomina, including Sacerdos, a priest, and Clemens, pleasant
or gentle.[4] Surnames derived from occupations and individual traits were very
typical of Roman cognomina.[5] Members
This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice,
see filiation. Tineii Rufi Quintus Tineius Rufus, governor of Thrace in AD 124,
during the reign of Hadrian, and consul suffectus from the Kalends of May to
the Kalends of October in 127. He was governor of Judaea from at least 130 to
132, at the beginning of the Bar Kochba rebellion.[6][7][8] Quintus Tineius Q.
f. Sacerdos Clemens, consul ordinarius in AD 158. Son of Quintus Tineius Rufus,
the consul of 124, he was created a patrician, and made a member of the College
of Pontifices[i] by the emperor Antoninus Pius. Three of his sons also became
consul.[9][10][11][12] Quintus Tineius Q. f. Q. n. Rufus, consul ordinarius in
AD 182, was one of the Salii Palatini.[13][14][15][16] Quintus Tineius Q. f. Q.
n. Sacerdos, consular legate in Bithynia from 189 to 190, and consul suffectus
in AD 192; he became Proconsul of Asia circa 210. He was consul ordinarius with
Elagabalus in 219.[13][17][18][19] Quintus Tineius Q. f. Q. n. Clemens, consul
ordinarius in AD 195.[20][21][22][23][24] Quintus Tineius, governor of Achaea,
may be identified with one of the consular Tineii, but which is uncertain.
Others Tineia Lucida, dedicated a tomb at Rome for her husband, Publius Aelius
Verus.[25] Tineia Antonia, buried at Rome, with a tomb dedicated by her sister,
Tineia Hygeia, dating to the second century AD.[26] Tineia Hygeia, dedicated a
tomb at Rome for her sister, Tineia Antonia, some time during the second
century.[26] Quintus Tineius Demetrius, prefect of Egypt from AD 189 to
190.[27] Marcus Tineius Ovinius L. f. Casto Pulchro, a senator and pontifex,
had been quaestor urbanus, and a candidate for the praetorship.[28] Quintus
Tineius Dorus, husband of Pulchra Domna, and father of Quintus Tineius
Primigenius.[29] Quintus Tineius Q. f. Primigenius, son of Quintus Tineius
Dorus and Pulchra Domna, for whom he built a tomb at Aternum in Sabinum.[29]
Quintus Tineius Primigenius, possibly a freedman, buried with Vibia Psyche at
Mutina in Etruria.[30] Quintus Tineius Herculanus, buried at Rome, aged
twelve.[31] Quintus Tineius Q. f. Her[mes?], a soldier from Nicomedia, and the husband
of Tineia Hieropis, buried a child at Rome.[1] Tineia Hieropis, wife of Quintus
Tineius Hermes.[1] Quintus Tineius Eusebes, husband of Postumia Callityche,
buried at Rome, aged twenty-two.[32] Gaius Tineius C. f. Threptus, named in an
inscription from Rome.[33] Tineius Longus, a cavalry prefect under Ulpius
Marcellus, governor of Britain during the reign of Commodus. An inscription
from Condercum indicates that he was quaestor designatus, but whether he
entered office, and if so which year, cannot be determined.[34][23] Marcus
Tineius, named in an inscription from Ara Bona in Pannonia Superior.[35] Tineia
Primitiva, buried at Castellum Tidditanorum in Numidia, aged seventy-nine.[36]
Lucius Clodius Tineius Pupienus Bassus, a young man from a senatorial family,
who assumed the Toga virilis at Rome early in the third century.[37] Tineius
Eubulus, freedman of the mother of Lucius Clodius Tineius Pupienus Bassus.[37]
Quintus Tineius Severus Petronianus, curator rei publicae, probably at Nicaea,
in AD 244.[38] Footnotes Only patricians
could become members of this college. See also List of Roman gentes
References CIL VI, 3499. Chase, pp. 120, 121. Chase, p. 110. New College Latin & English Dictionary,
s. v. sacerdos, clemens. Chase, pp.
110–112. Fasti Ostienses, CIL XIV,
244. PIR, vol. III, pp. 321, 322. Brill's New Pauly, "Tineius", No.
3. AE 1985, 994. CIL II, 742, CIL X, 7845, CIL XIV, 2410. PIR, vol. III, p. 323. Brill's New Pauly,
"Tineius", No. 6. CIL VI,
1978. AE 1903, 154, AE 1976, 26. PIR, vol. III, p. 322. Brill's New Pauly, "Tineius", No.
4. CIL VI, 1984, CIL
VI, 31162. PIR, vol. III, pp. 322,
323. Brill's New Pauly,
"Tineius", No. 5. CIL III, 4407, CIL XIV, 169. Digesta,
27. tit. 9. s. 1. Codex, 9. tit. 1. s.
1. PIR, vol. III, p. 321. Brill's New Pauly,
"Tineius", No. 1. CIL VI,
10810. Deutsche Inschriften Online,
3–A1, 4. Brill's New Pauly,
"Tineius", No. 2. CIL XIV,
3614. CIL IX, 3341. AE 1992, 622.
ICUR,
viii. 23295. CIL VI, 5137. CIL VI, 20792. CIL VII, 504.
AE 1995, 1259b. ILAlg, ii. 3,
8775. CIL VI, 41182. Brill's New Pauly, "Tineius", No.
7. Bibliography Codex Theodosianus. Digesta, or
Pandectae (The Digest). Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum
(The Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische
Akademie der Wissenschaften (1853–present). Giovanni Battista de Rossi,
Inscriptiones Christianae Urbis Romanae Septimo Saeculo Antiquiores (Christian
Inscriptions from Rome of the First Seven Centuries, abbreviated ICUR), Vatican
Library, Rome (1857–1861, 1888). René Cagnat et alii,
L'Année épigraphique (The Year in Epigraphy, abbreviated AE), Presses
Universitaires de France (1888–present). George Davis
Chase, "The Origin of Roman Praenomina", in Harvard Studies in
Classical Philology, vol. VIII, pp. 103–184 (1897). Paul von Rohden, Elimar
Klebs, & Hermann Dessau, Prosopographia Imperii Romani (The Prosopography
of the Roman Empire, abbreviated PIR), Berlin (1898). Stéphane Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie (Latin Inscriptions from
Algeria, abbreviated ILAlg), Edouard Champion, Paris (1922–present). John C. Traupman, The New College Latin & English Dictionary, Bantam
Books, New York (1995). Brill's New Pauly: Encyclopaedia of the Ancient World
(2002–2014). Categories: Roman gentesRoman gentes of Sabine originTineii And
for THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tineio – Ossia: Grice e
Tineio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tineio. For the Tineii,
the obvious historical celebrity is Quintus Tineius Rufus, the governor of
Judaea at the outbreak of the Bar Kokhba revolt and consul in AD 127. But for a Grice-Speranza entry, I think the
more interesting figure is actually his son: [GREXv3 | Word] Quintus Tineius Sacerdos Clemens, consul of
AD 158, made a patrician and admitted to the College of Pontiffs. [GREXv3 |
Word] Why? Because his cognomina are
almost a miniature philosophy seminar:
Sacerdos = priest. Clemens = gentle, mild. [GREXv3 | Word] The Roman question becomes: Is a name describing a role? Or a character?
Or merely identifying a person? That is
exactly the sort of issue that fascinated later philosophers of language. A
vignette: (*) QVIS EST? (Who is it?)
RESPONSVM. Sacerdos Clemens. (The priest Clemens.) +> A designation may
simultaneously identify a person, describe an office, and suggest a
character. The Gricean twist is that the
hearer may infer far more than the name strictly says. But there is another feature of the Tineii
that is irresistibly Gricean. The family fossilized the praenomen: Quintus, Quintus, Quintus, Quintus... [GREXv3
| Word] The source explicitly notes that
in this family the praenomen had become almost devoid of distinguishing force;
the sons were differentiated by their cognomina instead. [GREXv3 | Word] That
is a dream case for the philosophy of reference. Imagine: Q. Tineius Rufus Q. Tineius Sacerdos Q.
Tineius Clemens The praenomen
contributes almost nothing to identification. A Speranzian gloss: The Tineii demonstrate that not every
component of a name carries equal informational value. "Quintus"
survives by tradition while the cognomen does the actual discriminating work.
The information content migrates from one part of the name to another, while
reference remains secure. [GREXv3 | Word]
And that would have appealed strongly to Grice. One might almost
formulate a modified conversational maxim:
Do not multiply identifying components beyond necessity. In the Tineii, the Romans had already obeyed
it. One "Quintus" was enough; the real work was left to Rufus,
Sacerdos, and Clemens. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titanio – Ossia: Grice e
Titanio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titanio. The gens
Titania was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens
are mentioned by Roman writers, but a number are known from inscriptions. Origin The nomen Titanius is formed using the
suffix -anius, usually indicating derivation from place names.[1] The root of
Titanius seems to be a cognomen, Titanus; Chase classifies the nomen among
those gentilicia that either originated at Rome, or cannot be shown to have
come from anywhere else.[2] Members This
list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see
filiation. Gaius Titanius, the former master of Titania Charis, a freedwoman of
Aquileia in Venetia and Histria.[3] Titania C. l. Charis, a freedwoman, built a
first- or second-century sepulchre at Aquileia for her husband, Sextus Teius
Januarius, the freedman Quintus Catabronius Martialis, a woman named Titania
Secundina, and two persons named Menandrus and Persicus.[3] Titania Secundina,
buried in a first- or second-century sepulchre at Aquileia, built by the
freedwoman Titania Charis for her husband and several others.[3] Titania
Barbara, dedicated a second-century tomb at Vicus Fificulanus in Samnium for
her son, Titus Opsturius Benivolus, aged twenty-seven. She is probably the same
Barbara who dedicated a second-century monument at the same place for the
freedman Titus Opsturius Dasius, probably her husband.[4] Undated Titanii
Sextus Titanius Cinnamus, buried at Aveia in Samnium.[5] Publius Titanius
Successus, built a tomb at Rome for his wife, Porcia Zosima.[6] See also List
of Roman gentes References Chase, p.
118. Chase, p. 132. Brusin, Inscriptiones
Aquileiae, i. 680. CIL IX, 3590, CIL IX,
3591. CIL IX,
3641. CIL VI, 24835. Bibliography
Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (The Body of Latin
Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der
Wissenschaften (1853–present). George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman
Praenomina", in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII, pp.
103–184 (1897). Giovanni Battista Brusin, Inscriptiones Aquileiae (Inscriptions
of Aquileia), Udine (1991–1993). Category: Roman gentes And from THIS gens?
Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titanio – Ossia: Grice
e Titanio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titanio. For the
Titanii, the historical pickings are admittedly slim, but that can be an
advantage for a Speranzian reconstruction. My favorite is Titania Charis, the
freedwoman of Gaius Titanius, who built a sepulchre at Aquileia for her husband
and several others. [GREXv3 | Word] Why Charis? Because Charis (Greek χάρις) is one of those words whose semantic field is delightfully difficult
to pin down: grace, favor, charm,
gratitude, goodwill. A Gricean
immediately asks: Is charis a feeling? A
social relation? A disposition? A response?
That is exactly the sort of conceptual untidiness Grice enjoyed tidying.
A vignette: (*) QUID EST CHARIS? (What
is grace?) RESPONSUM. Si definiri facile posset, nomen philosophorum non esset.
(If it could easily be defined, philosophers would not need the word.) +>
Some concepts are learned through participation in practices rather than
explicit definition. There is also a
nice connection with your recent discussion of pleasure. Greek charis is not
identical to hedonē. One can experience pleasure alone. One normally
experiences charis in a social context:
giving, receiving, thanking, pleasing.
So if Thorius Balbus pushes us toward:
"What is pleasure?"
Titania Charis pushes us toward:
"What is pleasing someone?"
which is much closer to your observation about: "please" "if it pleases
you" s'il vous plaît R.S.V.P. The
semantic territory shifts from private enjoyment to interpersonal
acknowledgment. A second candidate would
be Publius Titanius Successus. [GREXv3 | Word] Not because we know much about
him, but because the cognomen Successus ("success", "good
outcome") is one of those Roman names that appears to state a result
rather than an essence. A Gricean joke follows naturally: (*) CUR SUCCESSUS VOCARIS? (Why are you
called Successus?) SUCCESSUS. Nomen est, non argumentum. (It is a name, not an
argument.) +> Names do not guarantee the properties they suggest. That returns us to one of your recurring
themes: descriptive content versus mere
designation. A Speranzian gloss might
read: The Titanii are useful because
Charis and Successus both tempt the philosopher into a lexical fallacy. One
imagines that the bearer possesses grace or success. Roman nomenclature quietly
reminds us otherwise. A name may suggest a property without asserting it. That
lesson lies somewhere between Varro, Grice, and common sense. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titedio –
Ossia: Grice e Titedio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titedio -- The gens
Titedia, also written as Titidia, or Titiedia, was an obscure plebeian family
at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens are mentioned by Roman
writers, and only one, Titidius Labeo, held any of the higher magistracies of
the Roman state; others are known from inscriptions. Origin The nomen Titedius belongs to a class
of gentilicia formed using the suffix -idius to form nomina from cognomina
ending in -idus. It resembles, and may be derived from the same root as the
Titia gens.[1] Praenomina The main
praenomina of the Titedii were Lucius and Gaius, which happen to be the two
most common praenomina at all periods of Roman history. A few of the Titedii
bore other names, including Gnaeus and Quintus.
Members This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of
this practice, see filiation. Titidia, the daughter of Titulus, made an
offering, perhaps to Diana, at Marruvium in Samnium, dating from the late
second or early first century BC.[2] Lucius Titedius L. l. Martialis, a
freedman, dedicated a tomb at Supinum Vicus in Samnium, dating from the late
first century BC or early first century AD, for his collibertus,[i] Lucius
Titedius Primigenius.[3] Lucius Titedius L. l. Primigenius, a freedman buried
at Supinum Vicus, in a tomb built by his collibertus Lucius Titedius Martialis,
in the late first century BC, or early first century AD.[3] Gaius Titedius, the
master of Jucundus, a slave buried at Casinum in Latium in AD 6.[4] Titidius
Labeo,[ii] praetor and governor of Gallia Narbonensis during the reign of
Tiberius. In AD 19, his wife, Vistilia, was accused of prostituting herself.
Labeo was reluctant to take action, but under pressure from the aediles, he
agreed to exile her to the island of Seriphos in the Cyclades. Labeo lived to
an advanced age, and was fond of painting small subjects, although his
contemporaries found his hobby unbecoming in a man of his rank.[5][6][7][8]
Titedius C. l. Philumena, a freedwoman buried at Iguvium in Umbria during the
first half of the first century.[9] Titidia Ɔ. l. Salvia, a freedwoman who
built a sepulchre at Paestum in Lucania, dating from the early or middle first
century, for herself and the freedwoman Titidia Sura.[10] Gnaeus Titidius, the
former master of Titidia Sura.[10] Titidia Cn. l. Sura, a freedwoman named in a
sepulchral inscription from Paestum, dating from the early or middle first
century, from a tomb built by the freedwoman Titidia Salvia.[10] Gaius Titedius
Moderatus, named in a first-century bronze inscription from Matrice in Hispania
Citerior.[11] Gaius Titedius Tyrannus, dedicated a first-century tomb at Vicus
Fificulanus for his wife, Titedia Prima.[12] Titedia Ɔ. l. Prima, a freedwoman
buried in a first-century tomb built by Gaius Titedius Tyrannus, Vicus
Fificulanus. Gaius Titedius, one of the municipal quattuorviri at Aquinum in
Latium in AD 74.[13] Titedia Venusta, the wife of Optatus, and mother of
Asteris, a young woman buried at Rome, aged seventeen years, three months, and
eleven days, between the middle of the first century and the end of the
second.[14] Lucius Titedius Valentinus, one of the Seviri Augustales, and the
husband of Titedia Venusta, was the father of Titedia Fucentia and Lucius
Titedius Valentinus, buried at Alba Fucens in Samnium during the first half of
the second century.[15] Titedia Venusta, the wife of Lucius Titedius
Valentinus, and mother of Titedia Venusta and Lucius Titedia Valentinus, a
young man buried at Alba Fucens during the first half of the second
century.[15] Titedia L. f. Fucentia, the daughter of Lucius Titedius Valentinus
and Titedia Venusta, and brother of Lucius Titedius Venustus, a young man
buried at Alba Fucens during the first half of the second century.[15] Lucius
Titedius L. f. Valentinus, a young man buried at Alba Fucens, aged twenty-two,
with a monument from his parents, Lucius Titedius Valentinus and Titedia
Venusta. His sister was Titedia Fucentia.[15] Titedia Apicula, honored by a
second-century inscription from Velitrae in Latium, dedicated by her son,
Colpus, and niece, Themis. Titiedius Augurius, a youth buried at Alba Fucens,
aged fourteen years, eleven months, and eight days, in a second-century tomb
built by Quintus Gargilius.[16] Titiedius Flaccus, a military tribune in the
Legio X Gemina, and one of the quattuorviri, buried in a second-century tomb at
Carsioli in Samnium.[17] Titidius Maximus, a centurion in the fourth cohort of
the Legio II Traiana Fortis, stationed at Nicopolis in Egypt in AD 157.[18]
Titiedia Faustina, named in a dedicatory inscription from Alba Fucens, dating
from AD 168.[19] Lucius Titedius L. f. Proculinus, the father of Lucius
Titedius Proculus, and at least one other child, who dedicated a statue in
their memory at Tusculum in AD 196.[20] Lucius Titedius L. f. L. n. Proculus,
the son of Lucius Titedius Proculinus, with whom he was honoured with a statue
placed by a sibling at Tusculum in AD 196.[20] Lucius Titiedius Flaccus
Petronianus, named in a sepulchral inscription from Rome, dating from the
latter half of the third century.[21] Lucius Titiedius L. f. Flaccus, a little
boy buried at Rome, aged four years and four days, in a tomb dating from the
latter half of the third century. He might be the same person as Lucius
Titiedius Petronianus, named earlier in the same inscription.[21] Titidia
Felicitas, buried at Rome, aged seventy, in a tomb built by her sons, Petronius
Proclus and Petronius Proclianus, dating from the first half of the fourth
century.[22] Undated Titidii Lucius Titiedius, named in an inscription from
Carsioli.[23] Titedius Agathopus, buried at Rome in a tomb built by Titedia
Felicula, either his mother or his wife.[24] Lucius Titiedius Alcimus, a potter
whose maker's mark was found on pottery from Sicily.[25] Titedia Felicula,
built a tomb at Rome for her husband and son, one of whom was Titedius
Agathopus.[24] Lucius Titedius Fortunatianus, buried at Rome, aged thirty-five
years, two months, six days, and thirteen hours, in a tomb built by his wife,
Titedia Memmia, and kinsman, Titedius Titianus.[26] Gaius Titedius Fuscus,
buried at Lambaesis in Numidia.[27] Lucius Titidius L. f. Maximus, buried in a
family sepulchre at Parentium in Venetia and Histria, built by his mother, the
freedwoman Septimia Myrtis, for herself, her son, and her husband, Lucius
Titidius Olympus.[28] Titedia Memmia, the wife of Lucius Titedius
Fortunatianus, for whom she built a tomb at Rome, along with her husband's
kinsman, Titedius Titianus.[26] Lucius Titidius Olympus, buried at Parentium,
in a family sepulchre built by his wife, the freedwoman Septimia Myrtis, for
herself, her husband, and their son, Lucius Titidius Maximus.[28] Lucius
Titiedius L. l. Philodamus, a freedman named along with several other freedmen
from various gentes in a sepulchral inscription from Rome.[29] Titiedia Plias,
buried at Rome, in a tomb dedicated by her husband, Titius Valerianus.[30]
Titedius Potamus, named in an inscription from Narbo in Gallia Narbonensis.[31]
Quintus Titedius Q. f. Secundus, buried at Civitas Popthensis in Numidia, aged
sixty-eight.[32] Titedius Titianus, a kinsman of Lucius Titedius Fortunatianus,
for whom he built a tomb at Rome, along with Fortunatianus' wife, Titedia
Memmia.[26] Titiedia L. l. Venusta, a freedwoman buried at Firmum Picenum, in a
tomb built by her husband, Allidius Claudius.[33] Notes Someone freed on the same occasion as
Primigenius. Titedius in some
manuscripts of Pliny; Titidius in Tacitus. A former reading was Ateius. See
also List of Roman gentes References
Chase, p. 122. CIL IX, 3654. CIL IX, 3877.
CIL X, 5161. Pliny, Historia
Naturalis, xxxv. 35. 4. s. 7. Tacitus,
Annales, ii. 85. Dictionary of Greek and
Roman Biography and Mythology, vol. II, p. 695
("Titidius Labeo"). PIR, vol.
III, p. 326 (T, No. 185). AE 1995,
478. AE 1968, 144. CIL II, 4975,62. CIL IX, 7616.
CIL X, 5405. CIL VI, 12558. CIL IX, 3948.
CIL IX, 4035. CIL VI, 33029. AE 1955, 238.
CIL IX, 3950. AE 1900, 133. CIL VI, 32469. ICUR, viii. 22674. CIL IX, 4054.
CIL VI, 27447. AE 2006, 509. CIL VI, 27448. CIL VIII, 4091. CIL V, 358.
Ferrua, Antiche Inscrizione Inedite di Roma, 5a, p. 106. BCAR,
1989/90-495. CIL XII, 4555. Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, i.
1164. AE 2009, 307. Bibliography Gaius Plinius Secundus (Pliny the Elder), Historia
Naturalis (Natural History). Publius Cornelius Tacitus, Annales. Dictionary of
Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, William Smith, ed., Little, Brown and
Company, Boston (1849). Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum
(The Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische
Akademie der Wissenschaften (1853–present). Giovanni Battista de Rossi,
Inscriptiones Christianae Urbis Romanae Septimo Saeculo Antiquiores (Christian
Inscriptions from Rome of the First Seven Centuries, abbreviated ICUR), Vatican
Library, Rome (1857–1861, 1888). Bulletin Archéologique du Comité des Travaux
Historiques et Scientifiques (Archaeological Bulletin of the Committee on
Historic and Scientific Works, abbreviated BCTH), Imprimerie Nationale, Paris
(1885–1973). René Cagnat et alii, L'Année épigraphique (The Year in
Epigraphy, abbreviated AE), Presses Universitaires de France (1888–present). Paul von Rohden, Elimar Klebs, & Hermann Dessau, Prosopographia
Imperii Romani (The Prosopography of the Roman Empire, abbreviated PIR), Berlin
(1898). Stéphane Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie (Latin
Inscriptions from Algeria), Edouard Champion, Paris (1922–present). Antonio
Ferrua, Antiche Inscrizione Inedite di Roma (Unedited Ancient Inscriptions from
Rome, 1939–1980). Category: Roman gentes ANd for THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titedio –
Ossia: Grice e Titedio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titedio For the
Titedii/Titidii, the Grice-Speranza choice is almost forced: Titidius (or Titedius) Labeo, praetor,
governor of Gallia Narbonensis under Tiberius, husband of the notorious
Vistilia, and amateur painter of small subjects. [GREXv3 | Word] Why Labeo? Because he sits exactly at the
intersection of: public office,
reputation, social description, reluctance to act. According to Tacitus, when Vistilia was
accused of publicly registering herself as a prostitute, Labeo was initially
reluctant to proceed. Only under pressure from the aediles did he consent to
her exile. [GREXv3 | Word] This yields a classic Gricean question: What is the force of social pressure? No law changes. No proposition changes. Yet
action occurs. One can imagine: (*)
AEDILES. Fac officium. (Do your duty.) LABEO. Nollem. (I would rather not.)
AEDILES. Oportet. (You must.) +> The practical effect of an utterance may
exceed its explicit content. Very
Oxonian. The painter of miniatures The
detail from Pliny the Elder is even more delightful. Labeo lived to an advanced
age and amused himself by painting small subjects, a hobby that contemporaries
found unbecoming in a man of his rank. [GREXv3 | Word] That sounds almost like
a philosopher of ordinary language:
Everyone else discusses great affairs of state. Labeo paints tiny
things. A Speranzian vignette: (*) AMICUS. Cur tam parva pingis? (Why do you
paint such small things?) LABEO. Quia magna satis alii pingunt. (Because others
paint large things well enough.) +> Attention to small phenomena may reveal
what grand theories overlook. One hears
a distant Grice smiling. The
nomenclature problem A second Gricean attraction is textual. Your entry notes
that the man appears as: Titedius in
some sources, Titidius in others. [GREXv3 | Word] That immediately raises one of your favorite
questions: When do variant descriptions
still refer to the same individual? The
referent remains stable. The nomen oscillates. A perfect case of: identity surviving descriptive variation. The runner-up: the colliberti I would also
mention: Lucius Titedius Martialis and
Lucius Titedius Primigenius. [GREXv3 | Word]
The inscription emphasizes that they were colliberti: freed on the same occasion. [GREXv3 |
Word] A wonderfully Roman relational
category. Not: brother, friend,
colleague, but: liberated together. A Gricean might say: Shared history often supplies common ground
more effectively than definition.
Speranza's gloss The Titidii
contribute a governor who preferred painting miniatures to displaying
senatorial grandeur. Philosophers of ordinary language likewise concern
themselves with small distinctions that others regard as beneath notice. Labeo
painted little pictures; Grice painted little conversational examples. Both
thought the details mattered. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tizio – Ossia: Grice e
Tizio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tizio -- The gens Titia was a plebeian
family at ancient Rome. The gens is rarely mentioned in the Republican period,
and did not rise out of obscurity till a very late time. None of its members
obtained the consulship under the Republic, and the first person of the name
who held this office was Marcus Titius in BC 31.[1] Origin The nomen Titius is a patronymic
surname, based on the praenomen Titus. Titus was roughly the sixth-most common
Latin praenomen throughout Roman history. However, it has been conjectured that
it was introduced to Latin through Titus Tatius, a Sabine king in the time of
Romulus, who came to Rome with many of his subjects. If Titus was originally a
Sabine praenomen, then the Titii may have been Sabines. But it is also possible
that Titus was common to both the Latin and Oscan tongues.[2][3][4] Praenomina The Titii used a wide variety of
praenomina, including Gaius, Quintus, Sextus, Lucius, Publius, Marcus, and
Titus. All of these were very common names.
Branches and cognomina During the later years of the Republic, some of
the Titii appear with the surnames Rufus, meaning "red" or
"reddish", and Strabo, referring to one who squints. These may have
been family-names, as at least two individuals in the gens bore these
cognomina. Numerous surnames occur in imperial times, including Sabinus,
Proculus, Aquilinus, and Gemellus, amongst others.[5][1] Members This list includes abbreviated
praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation. Gaius Titius,
an eques of the 2nd century BC, and an orator of considerable merit, praised by
Cicero.[6][7][8] Gaius Titius, a pleader of causes, who excited a mutiny of the
soldiers against the consul Lucius Porcius Cato in 89 BC, and escaped
punishment.[9] Sextus Titius, tribune of the plebs in 99 BC, attempted to
follow in the footsteps of Saturninus, but was resisted by the consul Marcus
Antonius.[10] Quintus Titius, triumvir monetalis in 90 BC.[11] Lucius Titius, a
Roman citizen at Agrigentum, who was robbed of his ring by Verres.[12] Titus
Titius T. f., the legate of Gnaeus Pompeius, when the latter was entrusted with
the superintendence of the corn-market.[13] Gaius Titius L. f. Rufus, praetor
urbanus in 50 BC.[14] Quintus Titius, sent by Caesar into Epirus in 48 BC to
obtain corn for his troops.[15] Lucius Titius, a military tribune during the
Alexandrine war, 48 BC.[16] Gaius Titius Strabo, an opponent of Caesar at the
time of his death.[17] Lucius Titius Strabo, an eques, whom Cicero introduced
to Brutus.[18] Publius Titius, tribune of the plebs in 43 BC, proposed the lex
Titia, which created the Second Triumvirate.[19][20][21] Lucius Titius,
proscribed by the triumvirs in 43 BC, but escaped to Sextus Pompeius in
Sicilia. He married Munatia, the sister of the orator Lucius Munatius
Plancus.[22][23] Marcus Titius L. f., consul suffectus in 31 BC, routed the
cavalry of Marcus Antonius shortly before the Battle of Actium. Lucius Titius,
perhaps a brother of Marcus Titius, the consul of 31 BC, was the father-in-law
of a Salvius, possibly Marcus Salvius Otho, grandfather of the emperor
Otho.[24][25] Titia L. f., the wife of a Salvius, possibly Marcus Salvius Otho,
grandfather of the emperor Otho. She died as a young woman in 23 BC.[24][25]
Titius Julianus, probably a mistake for Tettius Julianus. Titius Septimius, a
minor poet, about whose welfare Horace inquired in 20 BC.[26] Titius Sabinus,
an eques, and friend of Germanicus, betrayed by Sejanus and put to
death.[27][28][29] Titius Rufus, put to death in the reign of Caligula, for saying
that the senate thought differently from what it said.[30] Titius Proculus, put
to death in AD 48, because he had been privy to the adulteries of Gaius Silius
and Messalina.[31] Marcus Titius Marcellus, owned a brick producing
business.[32] Titius Aristo,[i] a distinguished jurist, was a friend of Pliny
the Younger, who praised his knowledge and practice of the law.[33] Marcus
Titius M. f. Lustricius Bruttianus, a decorated soldier who had won both the
mural and vallary crowns, served as military tribune, plebeian aedile,
quaestor, and praetor. He was consul suffectus in AD 108, and subsequently
governor of Achaia. Pliny the younger reports that he was falsely accused by a
colleague, Montanius Atticinus, whose misconduct he had uncovered, but acquitted
by Trajan.[34][35][36] Titia Quartilla, owner of a pottery production business,
she was possibly the granddaughter of M. Titius Marcellus and the sister of
Lucius Titius Epidius Aquilinus.[37] Lucius Titius Epidius Aquilinus, consul in
AD 125.[38] Lucius Titius Plautius Aquilinus, consul ordinarius in AD 162.
Titius Gemellus, a sculptor, of uncertain date.[39][40][41] Gaius Titius
Antonius Peculiaris, an eques See also List of Roman gentes Notes In some editions, Titus Aristo.
References Dictionary of Greek and Roman
Biography and Mythology, vol. III, p. 1157 ("Titia Gens"). Livy, i. 13.
De Praenominibus (epitome by Julius Paris) Chase, p. 152. Cassell's Latin and English Dictionary Cicero, Brutus, 45. Macrobius, ii. 9,
12. Meyer, p. 203, ff. (2nd ed.). Cassius Dio, Fragmenta 114, p. 46
(Reimar). Cicero, De Oratore,
ii. 11, 66; Pro Gaio Rabirio Perduellionis Reo, 9. Eckhel, vol. V, p. 325. Cicero, In Verrem, iv. 26. Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares, xiii.
58. Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares,
xiii. 58. Caesar, De Bello Civili, iii.
42. Hirtius, De Bello Alexandrino, 57. Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares, xii. 6. Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares, xiii.
14. Appian, Bellum Civile, iv. 7. Cassius Dio, xlvi. 49. Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares, x. 12. § 3,
x. 21. § 3. Cassius Dio, xlviii.
30. Velleius Paterculus, ii. 83. Emiliozzi, "Sull'epitaffio del 67 a. C.
nel sepolcro dei Salvii a Ferento".
Ottavianelli, "Sulle tracce di un imperatore di origini ferentiensi". Horace, Epistulae, i. 3. 9-14. Tacitus, Annales, iv. 18, 19, 68, 70, vi.
4. Cassius Dio, lviii. 1. Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia, viii.
40. s. 61. Cassius Dio, lix. 18. Tacitus, Annales, xi. 35. Birley. p. 93 Pliny the Younger, Epistulae, 22. Pliny the Younger, Epistulae, vi. 22. Rossignol, Un nouveau
cursus sénatorial. AE 2004, 1898. Opus. p. 100
CIL XV, 228, CIL XV, 360, CIL VI, 32516.
Boissard, Antiquitates Romanae, p. iii. fig. 132. Sillig, Catalogus Artificium (1827), s.
v. Rochette, Lettre à
M. Schorn, p. 419. Bibliography Marcus Tullius Cicero, Brutus, De Oratore, Pro
Gaio Rabirio Perduellionis Reo, In Verrem, Epistulae ad Familiares. Gaius
Julius Caesar, Commentarii de Bello Civili (Commentaries on the Civil War).
Aulus Hirtius, De Bello Alexandrino. Quintus Horatius Flaccus (Horace),
Epistulae. Marcus Velleius Paterculus, Compendium of Roman
History. Gaius Plinius Secundus (Pliny the Elder), Naturalis Historia (Natural
History). Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus (Pliny the Younger), Epistulae
(Letters). Publius Cornelius Tacitus, Annales. Appianus Alexandrinus (Appian),
Bellum Civile (The Civil War). Lucius Cassius Dio Cocceianus (Cassius Dio),
Roman History. Ambrosius Theodosius Macrobius, Saturnalia. Jean-Jacques
Boissard, Romanae Urbis Topographia et Antiquitates (1597–1602). Joseph Hilarius Eckhel, Doctrina Numorum Veterum (The Study of Ancient
Coins, 1792–1798). Karl Julius Sillig, Catalogus Artificium sive Architecti
Statuarii Sculptores Pictores Caelatores et Scalptores Graecorum et Romanorum
(Catalogue of Artists, with Greek and Roman Architects, Statuaries, Sculptors,
Painters, Ornamenters, and Engravers), Libraria Arnoldia, Dresden and Leipzig
(1827). Desiré-Raoul Rochette, Lettre à M. Schorn, Firmin Didot
Frères, Paris (1832). Henricus Meyerus, Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta ab Appio
inde Caeco usque ad Q. Aurelium Symmachum (Fragments of Roman Orators from
Appius Claudius Caecus to Quintus Aurelius Symmachus). L. Bourgeois-Mazé, Paris (1837). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography
and Mythology, William Smith, ed., Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1849). René Cagnat et alii, L'Année épigraphique (The Year in Epigraphy,
abbreviated AE), Presses Universitaires de France (1888–present). George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman Praenomina", in
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII (1897). D.P. Simpson,
Cassell's Latin and English Dictionary, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York
(1963). Adriana
Emiliozzi, "[www.persee.fr/doc/mefr_0223-5102_1983_num_95_2_1388
Sull'epitaffio del 67 a. C. nel sepolcro dei Salvii a Ferento]", in
Mélanges de l'École française de Rome, vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 701–717 (1983). Benoît Rossignol, "Fouilles au forum antique : Marcus Titius,
découverte d’un Vaisonnais au sommet de l’Empire" (2015), cited by Werner
Eck, "Position and Authority of the Provincial Legate and the Financial
Procurator in Judaea, 70–136 AD", in Jews and Christians in the First and
Second Centuries: The Interbellum 70‒132 CE, Joshua J. Schwartz, Peter J.
Tomson, eds., Brill (2017), p. 103. Giovanna Ottavianelli, "Sulle tracce
di un imperatore di origini ferentiensi: Marcus Salvius Otho", at
Archeotuscia.com, pp. 25–29 (2019). Opus. Vol. 5.
1986. Birley, Anthony (2000). Onomasticon to the Younger Pliny Letters and
Panegyric. K.G. Saur. ISBN 9783110958287.
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public
domain: Smith, William, ed. (1870). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and
Mythology. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help) Categories: TitiiRoman gentesRoman gentes of
Sabine origin nd from THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tizio –
Ossia: Grice e Tizio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tizio – For the Titii, there
are so many candidates that one is spoiled for choice. But for a Grice e
Speranza entry, I think two stand out. 1. Publius Titius and the lex Titia This
is the most Gricean in a political-philosophical sense. According to your
material, Publius Titius, tribune of the plebs in 43 BC, proposed the lex
Titia, the law that created the Second Triumvirate. [GREXv3 | Word] The
fascinating thing is that a law is a speech act par excellence. A statute does
not merely describe: "Three men are
powerful." It performs: "These three men shall possess
authority." A Gricean
vignette: (*) CIVIS. Quid est lex? (What
is a law?) TITIVS. Verba quae rem publicam mutant. (Words that change the
state.) +> Some utterances do not report a reality but constitute one. That is almost Austin before Austin. 2. Titius Rufus This is my favorite Gricean
case. He was executed under Caligula because he said: the senate thought differently from what it
said. [GREXv3 | Word] Now that is pure
Grice. The whole point is the distinction between: what is said, what is thought, what is meant. A perfect Oxonian example. One can almost
hear Grice beginning a lecture:
"Suppose a senator says X while believing Y..." For Rufus, the proposition "The senate thinks differently from what
it says" is practically a
one-sentence summary of implicature. A Speranzian reconstruction: (*) SENATOR. Consentimus. (We agree.) TITIVS
RVFVS. Dicitis. (You say so.) +> The content publicly uttered need not
coincide with the attitude privately held.
For a philosopher of conversation, that is much richer than any number
of governors and military tribunes. 3.
The jurist Titius Aristo A very close runner-up is the distinguished jurist
Titius Aristo, praised by Pliny the Younger for his legal knowledge. [GREXv3 |
Word] The attraction here is that Roman jurists constantly analyze: what words mean, what obligations arise from
words, how general rules apply to particular cases. In a sense, they are ancient
ordinary-language philosophers. A final
Speranzian gloss If I were choosing one Titius for Grice, I would select Titius
Rufus. Why? Because his reported crime is almost Grice's life's work compressed
into a single sentence: The senate says
one thing and thinks another. [GREXv3 | Word]
The Stoics could have built a doctrine from it, the historians a
narrative, and Grice an entire seminar. And do we have the Latin for the second
case -- cogitare -- dicere? -- It may be plain chicanery, as this seems to be
the case. For 'implicatum' there may be a divergence ("You should say what
you mean" "Oh, I do, at least I mean what I say, that's the same
thing" "Not the same thing a bit" -- "You might just as
well say that you eat what you see is the same thing as you see what you
eat" said the Duck. "It is the same thing with you!" -- Alice in
Wonderland. So depending on what the Latin was and the circumstance we still
can never justify Caligula's justification unless it was makestas something --
high treason or something Thanks -- by the desiratum of conversational candour,
indeed, what you should say what one thinks -- This Gricelater connects with Qualitas,
when he adheres to the Kantian quartette of four categories. Thanks ("do
not say that you believe to be false" -- which is not yet 'Do not say what
you do not think". etc). A very good Gricean caution. The trouble is that
our source for the incident, Cassius Dio, gives us the charge, but in the
translated material I found he does not preserve the original Latin wording of
what Titius Rufus allegedly said. What Dio reports is: "Titius Rufus ... was charged with
having declared that the senate thought one way and voted another."
[lexundria.com], [lexundria.com] That is
already an interpretation of the content. So at present we have: the accusation, not the exact wording. And that makes a philosophical difference.
Why Grice would care Suppose the underlying thought was: Aliud senatus sentit, aliud censet. or Aliud
cogitat, aliud dicit. or Aliud vult, aliud suffragatur. These are all quite different. The first
concerns judgment. The second concerns saying. The third concerns willing. And
Grice's entire point is that one should not conflate: what is said, what is meant, what is
believed, what is intended. Recall his
favorite distinction: "mean what
you say" is not equivalent to "say what you mean." Your Alice quotation is exactly apt. The two
relations are not symmetric. Was Rufus describing implicature? Not necessarily.
Indeed, I think you are right to resist that temptation. If a senator
says: "I vote aye" while secretly believing: "the measure is disastrous" that is not yet implicature. It may be: hypocrisy, cowardice, political calculation,
coercion, insincerity. Gricean implicature
normally presupposes that the speaker is still cooperating in communication. Rufus'
charge sounds closer to: public
profession versus private belief. That
is nearer to Quality than to implicature. Quality and candour Grice's later
formulation is approximately: Do not say
what you believe to be false. Notice
that this is weaker than: Say everything
you believe. And weaker still than: Say exactly what you think. A politician can satisfy Grice's Quality
maxim while remaining extremely reticent. He may omit. He may evade. He may
strategically remain silent. Thus:
"The senate thinks one thing and votes another" need not mean that the senate is literally
lying. It may mean that political pressures cause public acts not to reflect
private convictions. Why Caligula found it dangerous If Dio's report is
accurate, the remark is explosive because it attacks the legitimacy of public
institutions. The claim is effectively:
The senate's official acts do not express its actual judgments.
[lexundria.com], [lexundria.com] That is
not quite maiestas in itself, but under an emperor like Caligula many
observations that undermined confidence in public authority could become
politically dangerous. The real issue is probably less semantic than political.
A Grice-Speranza gloss One might distinguish three theses: The senate says one thing and means another.
The senate says one thing and thinks another. The senate says one thing and
implies another. Only the third is
straightforwardly Gricean. Dio's report most naturally suggests the second.
[lexundria.com], [lexundria.com] Rufus appears to have been accused of exposing
a discrepancy between public vote and private belief. A philosopher of language
would then ask whether that discrepancy arose from deception, fear, convention,
prudence, or merely the ordinary difference between what one votes for and what
one would ideally prefer. That question is considerably subtler than Caligula's
prosecutors were likely to allow. And Dio said that in Greek? What is the
reference, you know? Thanks Yes. Cassius
Dio wrote his Roman History in Greek, specifically Koine Greek, even though he
was a Roman senator and consul. His great work, the Ῥωμαϊκὴ Ἱστορία (Roman History), originally comprised 80 books. [britannica.com],
[en.wikipedia.org] For the passage about Titius Rufus, the reference is: Cassius Dio, Roman History 59.18.5.
[lexundria.com], [lexundria.com] The
English translation cited there reads:
"Titius Rufus ... was charged with having declared that the senate
thought one way and voted another." [lexundria.com], [lexundria.com] Unfortunately, the source I found gives only
the English translation, not the original Greek wording. [lexundria.com], [lexundria.com]
Your Gricean caution is exactly right. Depending on the Greek verb, the
accusation could range from: thinking
differently from voting (belief vs. public act), thinking differently from
saying (belief vs. utterance), wanting differently from decreeing (desire vs.
institutional action). Those are
philosophically very different claims. In fact, I rather suspect Grice would
say that the Dio formulation, as translated, concerns not implicature but
sincerity. It is closer to the territory of the Maxim of Quality: Do not say what you believe to be false. than to conversational implicature proper.
The interesting thing is that Rufus' alleged remark amounts to a public observation
about the senate's collective insincerity. Under Caligula, that is politically
explosive even if it is true. One need not invoke a theory of implicature at
all; one needs only the claim: "The
senate's votes do not reflect the senate's actual judgments."
[lexundria.com], [lexundria.com] And
that is dangerous enough. A nice Gricean formulation might be: The accusation is not that the senate implied
one thing and said another; it is that the senate believed one thing and
officially enacted another. That is a
problem of candour rather than implicature. If you'd like, I can also try to
reconstruct what the lost Greek behind Cary's English translation in Dio
59.18.5 was likely to have looked like, using Dio's usual vocabulary for
"think", "vote", and "decree". Does this below
help? Thanks The numbers and names you
provided point directly to a specific passage in classical literature: Cassius
Dio's Roman History, Book 59, Chapter 18, Section 5, which mentions an
individual named Titius Rufus. The
Context of "Dio 59.18.5" In this passage of his Roman History, the
ancient historian Cassius Dio describes the tyrannical behavior of the Roman
Emperor Caligula (Gaius). Section 5 specifically recounts the fate of a man
named Titius Rufus: "The same course was taken by Titius Rufus, who was
charged with having declared that the senate thought one way and voted
another..." The Passage in Greek and English 1. Ancient Greek (Original
Text) τὸ δ᾽ αὐτὸ τοῦτο καὶ Τίτιος Ῥοῦφος ἔπαθεν, αἰτιαθεὶς ὅτι εἴποι τὴν βουλὴν
ἄλλα μὲν φρονεῖν ἄλλα δὲ ψηφίζεσθαι. 2. English (Translation by Earnest Cary)
"The same course was taken by Titius Rufus, who was charged with having
declared that the senate thought one way and voted another." Key
Vocabulary Breakdown Dio (Δίων): Refers to Lucius Cassius Dio, the
Greek-speaking Roman senator and historian who authored the text. Titius
(Τίτιος): The first name (nomen) of Titius Rufus, the Roman senator mentioned
in this specific line. (Note: While "Titius" is also famous in
science for the Titius–Bode law of planetary spacing, your specific coordinates
of 59, 18, and 5 align with the book, chapter, and section numbering of Cassius
Dio's classical text rather than an astronomical formula.) Would you like to
explore more of Book 59 to see what else happened during Caligula's reign, or
are you looking for a different classical citation? Yes, that helps a great
deal, because now we have the Greek. Dio's text is given as: τὴν βουλὴν ἄλλα μὲν φρονεῖν ἄλλα δὲ
ψηφίζεσθαι. [GREXv3 | Word]
Literally: "that the senate
thinks one thing but votes another." [GREXv3 | Word] Or, word-by-word: ἡ βουλή = the senate. ἄλλα μὲν ... ἄλλα δέ
... = one thing ... another thing. φρονεῖν = to think, have in mind, hold an
opinion. ψηφίζεσθαι = to vote, decide by vote, cast a vote. [GREXv3 |
Word] The striking thing, from a Gricean
angle, is that Dio does not say: λέγειν
... ("to say") but φρονεῖν ("to think") versus
ψηφίζεσθαι ("to vote"). [GREXv3 | Word] That is important. The charge is not: "The senate says one thing and means
another." Nor: "The senate says one thing and implies
another." Nor even: "The senate says one thing and believes
another." The contrast is more
institutional: private judgment versus
public vote. In modern terms: The senators inwardly favor A but officially
vote for B. That is closer to political
cowardice, pressure, conformity, or opportunism than to implicature. Why Caligula might dislike it The statement
attacks the credibility of the senate as a deliberative body. If true, it
implies: Senate decrees do not express
senatorial judgment. The vote becomes a
ritual rather than a genuine act of collective reasoning. That is politically
dangerous regardless of whether it is true.
Grice and candour This actually fits better with Grice's concern with
sincerity than with implicature. The Greek opposition is: φρονεῖν ("thinking") versus
ψηφίζεσθαι ("voting"). [GREXv3 | Word] If the contrast had been: φρονεῖν versus λέγειν ("thinking" versus
"saying"), then we would be much closer to your quotation from Alice
and to Grice's mean what you say versus
say what you mean. But Dio's
wording is more constitutional and political than semantic. A Grice-Speranza gloss One might formulate
the progression like this:
Implicature say A, mean B. Insincerity
say A, believe B. The case of
Titius Rufus think A, vote B. The third is not quite a linguistic
discrepancy at all. It is a discrepancy between deliberation and official
action. Still, it comes very close to Grice's later concern that public
performances often fail to reveal the attitudes that underlie them. The Greek
is therefore philosophically revealing: ἄλλα
μὲν φρονεῖν ἄλλα δὲ ψηφίζεσθαι "to think one thing and vote another."
[GREXv3 | Word] That is less a theory of
meaning than a theory of politics.
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titinio – Ossia: Grice e
Titinio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titinio. The gens
Titinia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are
mentioned as early as the time of the decemvirs, but only a few held any
magistracies, and none of them ever attained the consulship.[1] Origin The nomen Titinius belongs to a class
of gentilicia formed using the suffix -inius, typically used to derive nomina
from other gentilicia, or from surnames ending in -inus. In this instance, the
name is likely derived from the nomen Titius, which in turn was formed from the
praenomen Titus, and was reckoned a gentilicium of Sabine origin.[2] Praenomina The chief praenomina of the
Titinii during the Republic were Marcus and Gaius. The earliest Titinii
mentioned in history also used Lucius and Sextus, while in a later period we
find Publius, Quintus, and Gnaeus. All of these were amongst the most common
names at all periods of Roman history.
Members This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of
this practice, see filiation. Marcus Titinius, tribune of the plebs in 449
BC.[3] Sextus Titinius, tribune of the plebs in 439 BC.[4] Lucius Titinius
Pansa Saccus, consular tribune in 400 and 396 BC.[5] Marcus C. f. C. n.
Titinius, magister equitum in 302 BC to Gaius Junius Bubulcus Brutus.[6]
Publius Titinius, legate in 200 BC, during the war against the Gauls.[7]
Publius Titinius Menas, a Roman citizen who brought the first barber to
Rome.[8] Marcus Titinius, tribune of the plebs in 193 BC.[9] Gaius Titinius,
tribune of the plebs in 193 BC.[9] Marcus Titinius Curvus, praetor urbanus in
178 BC. He levied troops at Rome in this year, and gave an audience of the
Senate to Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus and Lucius Postumius Albinus on their
return from Spain.[10] Marcus Titinius, praetor in 178 BC, assigned to Nearer
Spain with the title of proconsul, and governed it for four years, until 174.
In 171, he was accused of malversation in the province, but was acquitted.[11]
Gaius Titinius Gadaeus, one of the leaders of a slave revolt in Sicily; he
betrayed an important fort to the praetor Publius Licinius Nerva in 103 BC.[12]
Marcus Titinius, a legate of Licinius Nerva during the Servile War in Sicily;
he was defeated by the slaves.[12] Gaius Titinius, the husband of Fannia who
concealed Marius in 88 BC.[13] Gnaeus Titinius, a distinguished Roman eques,
who resisted the tribune Marcus Livius Drusus in 91 BC.[14] Titinii, mentioned
among the people of property proscribed by Sulla and murdered by Catiline in 81
BC.[15] Quintus Titinius, one of the judges at the trial of Verres in 70 BC,
was a brother of Gaius Fannius, a Roman eques. This Titinius carried on the
business of a moneylender, and as such Cicero had dealings with him. On the
breaking out of the Civil War in 49 BC, he espoused the cause of Pompey, but
his son, who had been adopted by one Pontius, and who is therefore called
Pontius Titinianus, sided with Caesar.[16] Titinius, a centurion in the army of
Cassius at the battle of Philippi in 42 BC, was sent by his commander, after
his defeat by Antony, to see how Brutus had fared; but as Titinius did not
return so soon as was expected, Cassius, supposing all was lost, put an end to
his own life. Titinius, on his arrival, killed himself over the body of
Cassius, to atone for his involuntary error.[17][18][19] Titinius, legate of
Octavian in his war with Sextus Pompeius.[20] Gaius Titinius, a name that
appears on coins, cannot be reliably connected to any of the Titinii mentioned
in history. Titinius, a poet, is the earliest known composer of tabernariae. He
survived Terence, but only fragments survive. Gnaeus Octavius Titinius Capito,
a civil servant and writer of the late first and early second century. See also
List of Roman gentes Titinius (disambiguation) References Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and
Mythology, vol. III, p. 1157 ("Titinia Gens"). Chase, pp. 126, 129. Livy, iii. 54. Livy, iv. 16.
Livy, v. 12; v. 18. Livy, x.
1. Livy, xxxi. 21. Kaufman, "Roman Barbers". Livy, xxxv. 8. Livy, xl. 59; xli. 5, 6. Livy, xli. 15, 26; xliii. 2. Diodorus, xxxvi. Valerius Maximus, viii. 2. Cicero, Pro Cluentio, 56. Quintus Cicero, De Petitione Consulatus, c.
2. Cicero, In Verrem, i. 49; Ad Atticum,
ii. 4, v. 21, vii. 16, ix. 6, ix. 9, 18, 19.
Valerius Maximus, ix. 9. Appian,
Bellum Civile, iv. 113. Plutarch,
"The Life of Brutus", 43.
Appian, Bellum Civile, v. 111. Bibliography Marcus Tullius Cicero,
Epistulae ad Atticum, In Verrem, Pro Cluentio. Quintus Tullius Cicero, De
Petitione Consulatus (attributed). Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca Historica
(Library of History). Titus Livius (Livy), History of Rome. Valerius Maximus,
Factorum ac Dictorum Memorabilium (Memorable Facts and Sayings). Lucius
Mestrius Plutarchus (Plutarch), Lives of the Noble Greeks and Romans. Appianus
Alexandrinus (Appian), Bellum Civile (The Civil War). Dictionary of Greek and
Roman Biography and Mythology, William Smith, ed., Little, Brown and Company,
Boston (1849). George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman Praenomina",
in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII, pp. 103–184 (1897). David
B. Kaufman, "Roman Barbers", in The Classical Weekly, No. 25 (March
21, 1932). This article incorporates
text from a publication now in the public domain: Smith, William (1870).
"Titinius". In Smith, William (ed.). Dictionary of Greek and Roman
Biography and Mythology. Vol. 3. p. 1158. Categories: Roman gentesTitinii And
about THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titinio – Ossia: Grice
e Titinio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titinio. For the
Titinii, there are several excellent Gricean candidates, but one towers above
the rest: Titinius, the centurion in
Cassius' army at the battle of Philippi. [GREXv3 | Word] Why? Because the entire episode is about
misinterpretation of evidence, which is very close to Grice's concerns about
what a sign warrants us in believing. According to Plutarch, Appian, and
Valerius Maximus, after a reverse suffered by his forces, Cassius sent Titinius
to discover the outcome on Brutus' side. Titinius failed to return quickly.
Cassius interpreted the delay as evidence of disaster and killed himself.
Titinius then returned safely, discovered what had happened, and killed himself
over Cassius' body. [GREXv3 | Word] A perfect Grice-Speranza reconstruction: (*) CASSIVS. Cur non redit? (Why does he not
return?) +> All is lost. TITINIVS (reverting). Non hoc significabam. (That
was not what my delay signified.) The
whole catastrophe turns on the distinction between: a fact, an inference drawn from the fact, the
meaning attributed to the fact. Cassius
reads: delay as
defeat. But the sign
underdetermines the conclusion. That is almost textbook Grice. The poet Titinius A close second is: Titinius, the earliest known composer of
tabernariae. [GREXv3 | Word] This is
attractive because dramatic dialogue is one of the richest ancient sources for
conversational phenomena: irony,
misunderstanding, indirect requests, innuendo.
A writer of comedies is practically a field linguist of ordinary
language. The barber There is also: Publius Titinius Menas, who is credited with
bringing the first barber to Rome. [GREXv3 | Word] This creates an amusing link with the earlier
Ticinius tradition and with the barbershop as a site of conversation. But
historically the most memorable and philosophically richest Titinius remains
the centurion at Philippi. A genuinely
Gricean moral The Philippi story turns not on what someone said, but on what
someone concluded. Cassius observes:
Titinius has not yet returned. He
infers: Brutus has been defeated. He acts:
suicide. The inference is false.
Hence: Observation ≠ interpretation. A Speranzian gloss might be: The Titinii contribute one of antiquity's
great lessons in unintended communication. Titinius sent no message, uttered no
word, and intended no signal. Yet his absence was interpreted as one. Cassius
died not from a proposition but from an inference. That distinction would have
pleased Grice greatly. [GREXv3 | Word]
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tittio – Ossia: Grice
e Tittio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tittio. The gens
Tittia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens
appear in history, but Marcus Tittius Frugi attained the consulship in AD 80. A
number of other Tittii are known from inscriptions. Origin Several of the earlier Tittii came
from Casilinum in Campania, while others came from Atina in Latium, near the
Campanian border. Praenomina The Tittii
known from epigraphy used a number of common praenomina, chiefly Lucius, Gaius,
Marcus, and Quintus. Besides these, a few Tittii bore other common names,
including Gnaeus and Titus. Members This
list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see
filiation. Gaius Tittius C. f., one of the officials in charge of building
walls for the temples of Jupiter Optimus Maximus and the Dioscuri at Casilinum
in Campania in 108 and 106 BC.[1] Gaius Tittius C. l. Philargyrus, a freedman
named in an inscription from Casilinum, dating from the latter half of the
first century BC.[2] Quintus Tittius Q. f., the husband of Tittia, and father
of Tittius Pontanus, Lucius, Gnaeus, and Quintus Tittius, and Tittia. His son
Tittius Pontanus built a family sepulchre for them all at Atina in Latium,
dating from the first half of the first century.[3] Tittia M. f., the wife of
Quintus Tittius, and mother of Tittius Pontanus, Lucius, Gnaeus, and Quintus
Tittius, and Tittia. Her son Tittius Pontanus built a family sepulchre for them
all at Atina, dating from the first half of the first century.[3] Tittius Q. f.
Q. n. Pontanus, built a family sepulchre at Atina, dating from the first half
of the first century, for himself, his wife, Tittia, his parents, Quintus
Tittius and Tittia, brothers, Lucius, Gnaeus, and Quintus Tittius, and sister
Tittia.[3] Tittia Sp. f., the wife of Tittius Pontanus, who built a family
sepulchre at Atina, dating from the first half of the first century, for
himself, his wife, his parents, brothers, and sister.[3] Lucius Tittius Q. f.
Q. n., the son of Quintus Tittius and Tittia, and brother of Tittius Pontanus,
who built a family sepulchre at Atina, dating from the first half of the first
century, for himself, his wife, his parents, brothers, and sister.[3] Gnaeus
Tittius Q. f. Q. n., the son of Quintus Tittius and Tittia, and brother of
Tittius Pontanus, who built a family sepulchre at Atina, dating from the first
half of the first century, for himself, his wife, his parents, brothers, and
sister.[3] Quintus Tittius Q. f. Q. n., the son of Quintus Tittius and Tittia,
and brother of Tittius Pontanus, who built a family sepulchre at Atina, dating
from the first half of the first century, for himself, his wife, his parents,
brothers, and sister.[3] Tittia Q. f. Q. n., the daughter of Quintus Tittius
and Tittia, and sister of Tittius Pontanus, who built a family sepulchre at
Atina, dating from the first half of the first century, for himself, his wife,
his parents, brothers, and sister.[3] Tittia L. l. Daphne, a freedwoman named
in a first-century inscription from Casilinum.[4] Marcus Tittius M. f. Gratus,
buried in a first-century tomb at Gratianopolis in Gallia Narbonensis.[5] Gaius
Tittius Titulus, the son of Vatio, buried at Gratianopolis, in a tomb dating
from the latter half of the first century.[6] Marcus Tittius Frugi, consul
suffectus for the last two months of AD 80, during the reign of Titus.[7]
Tittius, a middle or late second-century potter whose maker's mark has been
found at Aquincum in Pannonia Inferior and Brigetio in Pannonia Superior.[8][9]
Titus Tittius T. f. Placidus Tuder, a speculator, or scout, named in an
inscription from Rome dating from AD 180.[10] Tittius Felix, a member of the
boot-makers' guild at Ostia in Latium in AD 198.[11] Marcus Tittius Castrensis,
a soldier in the fifth cohort of the Vigiles at Rome in AD 210. He served in
the century of Aeilius Torquatus.[12] Tittia Festa, a little girl buried at Puteoli
in Campania, aged five years, three months, and one day, in a third-century
tomb built by her mother, Pompeia Felicitas.[13] Undated Tittii Tittius, a
potter whose maker's mark has been found at Axima in Alpes Graiae;
Augustonemetum in Aquitania; Duroliponte, Londinium, and Eboracum in Britannia;
and Argentorate in Germania Superior.[14][15] Tittia Amobbalis, buried at
Lamiggiga in Numidia, aged eighty, with a tomb built by her heirs and
legatees.[16] Tittius Asper, a physician at Rome.[17] Gaius Tittius Carmacus, a
plumbarius, or plumber, who made an offering to Jupiter Optimus Maximus at
Heliopolis in Syria, and donated statues of Sol, Luna, and Victoria.[18] Lucius
Tittius Caupo, a potter whose maker's mark has been found at Baeterrae in
Gallia Narbonensis.[19] Tittia Nice, dedicated a tomb at Rome for her
daughter.[20] Tittius Oppius, a potter whose maker's mark has been found at
Augusta Emerita in Lusitania.[21] Marcus Tittius Re[...], made an offering to
one or more of the gods at Berytus in Syria.[22] Tittius Q. f. Rufus, a priest
of Fortuna at Interamna Lirenas.[23] Tittius Cettinus Cocillus, an apparitor,
or deputy to Sextus Julius Lucanus, one of the duumvirs of the city of
Segusiavorum in Gallia Lugdunensis.[24] Lucius Tittius Thyrsus, a potter whose
maker's mark has been found at Tarraco in Hispania Citerior.[25] Marcus Tittius
C. f. Ursanus, named in an inscription from Atina, along with Julia Tima, a
freedwoman of the emperor.[26] See also List of Roman gentes References CIL I, 2944, CIL I, 3778. CIL X, 4373. CIL X, 5157.
CIL X, 6186. CIL XII, 2290. CIL XII, 2292. AE 1998, 419, AE 2007, 106. CIL III, 12014,559a. CIL III,
12014,559b. Kovács and Szábó, Tituli
Aquincenses, iii. 1457,20. CIL VI,
2382. CIL XIV, 4569. CIL VI, 1057.
CIL X, 3017. CAG, 67-02, p. 372;
73, p. 95; 63-01, pp. 231, 252. CIL VII, 1336,1128a, CIL VII, 1336,1128b, CIL VII, 1336,1129. CIL VIII, 4408. CIL XV, 3623. CIL III, 14386d. CAG, 34-2, p. 351. Nuovo Bollettino di Archeologia Cristiana,
1917–14. Hispania Epigraphica, 2012,
00091. CIL III, 6684. AE 1911, 206.
CIL XIII, 1632. CIL II, 4970,524e. AE 1974, 230. Bibliography Theodor Mommsen et
alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (The Body of Latin Inscriptions,
abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften
(1853–present). René Cagnat et alii, L'Année épigraphique (The Year in
Epigraphy, abbreviated AE), Presses Universitaires de France (1888–present).
Nuovo Bollettino di Archeologia Cristiana (1913–present). La Carte
Archéologique de la Gaule (Archaeological Map of Gaul, abbreviated CAG),
Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres (1931–present). Hispania
Epigraphica (Epigraphy of Spain), Madrid (1989–present). Péter Kovács and Ádám
Szábó, Tituli Aquincenses, Budapest (2009–present). Category: Roman gentes And for THIS gens?
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H.
P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tittio – Ossia: Grice
e Tittio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tittio. For the
Tittii, I am tempted away from the consul and toward a much more Gricean
figure: Titius Sabinus, the friend of
Germanicus, who was betrayed under Tiberius through the machinations of
Sejanus. [GREXv3 | Word] Why? Because
the episode (as reported by Tacitus) is fundamentally about conversation as
evidence. Sabinus was induced to speak, his words were covertly overheard, and
the resulting reports were used against him. [GREXv3 | Word] That creates a
splendid Gricean theme: An utterance
addressed to one audience may be interpreted by another. A vignette:
(*) SABINVS. Tibi loquor. (I am speaking to you.) DELATOR. Et ego audio.
(And I am listening.) +> The intended audience of an utterance need not
coincide with its actual audience. That
is very close to later concerns about intended addressees and unintended
overhearers. A second excellent candidate
is: Titius Aristo, the jurist praised by
Pliny the Younger. [GREXv3 | Word] The
Roman jurists are often astonishingly close to Oxford philosophers because they
spend their lives asking: What exactly
was promised? What exactly was meant? What follows from the words used? A jurist lives in the territory between
sentence and consequence. But there is a
third, irresistibly Gricean Titius:
Titius Rufus, executed under Caligula for saying that the senate thought
one thing and voted another. [lexundria.com], [lexundria.com] Now that we have the Greek from Dio: τὴν βουλὴν ἄλλα μὲν φρονεῖν ἄλλα δὲ ψηφίζεσθαι "the senate thinks one thing and votes another." This is not quite implicature. The contrast
is: φρονεῖν = to think, ψηφίζεσθαι = to vote. So the discrepancy is between: private judgment and
public action. That is nearer to
Grice's concern with sincerity than with conversational implicature. However, if I had to choose a single Titius
for Grice e Speranza, I would probably choose Titius Sabinus. Why? Because his
downfall turns on a question that haunted Grice: For whom is an utterance intended? The speaker thinks he is talking to one
person. The state is listening. And Roman history proceeds accordingly. [GREXv3
| Word] A Speranzian gloss: The Titii
teach that conversation is never merely between speaker and hearer. There may
also be an auditor behind the wall, a prosecutor behind the auditor, and an
emperor behind the prosecutor. The philosophy of conversation ends where the
history of Rome begins.
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tituzio – Ossia: Grice e Tituzio
– Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tituzio -- The gens Titucia, occasionally spelled
Tituccia, was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned in history, of whom the most
illustrious was Titucius Roburrus, praefectus urbi in AD 283.[1] Others are
known from inscriptions. Origin Most of
the inscriptions of the Titucii are from Sabinum and adjoining regions of
Samnium, indicating that the Titucii were probably Sabines, Samnites, or
belonged to some other Oscan-speaking people of central Italy. The nomen
Titucius is presumably derived from the cognomen Titucus, found in an
inscription of the Flavia gens.[2] Praenomina
The praenomina known from the epigraphy of the Titucii are Titus, Gaius,
Marcus, Quintus, and Manius. All of these were common throughout Roman history,
although Manius, found in a filiation of this gens, was more distinctive than
the others—perhaps due to its association with the Manes, the spirits of the
dead.[3] Members This list includes
abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation.
Gaius Titucius T. f., one of the quattuorvirs of Alba Fucens in Sabinum, where
his ashes were deposited in a first-century cinerarium.[4] Titus Titucius,
named in a first-century inscription from Marruvium in Sabinum.[5] Titus
Titucius Florianus, together with Teia Galla, perhaps his wife, dedicated a
first-century monument at Venafrum in Samnium for Narcissus, a slave and
vilicus, or steward, aged twenty-five.[6] Titucia Grata, buried in a
first-century tomb at Marruvium.[7] Titus Titucius Ɔ. l. Sota, a freedman
buried in a first-century tomb at Lucus Angitiae in Sabinum.[8] Titucia M'. f.,
buried at Alba Fucens, in a tomb dating from the latter half of the first
century.[9] Marcus Tituccius Daphnus, dedicated a second-century tomb at Rome
for two slave-children of his household: Lucana, aged nine years, three months,
thirteen days, and four hours, and her brother, Macedo, aged five years, two
months, one day, and three hours.[10] Titucia Q. l. Felicula, a freedwoman
buried at Astigi in Hispania Baetica, aged fifty, in a tomb dating from the
latter half of the second century.[11] Titucius Roburrus,[i] praefectus urbi in
AD 283, according to the Chronography of 354.[1][12] Undated Titucii Marcus
Tituccius Saturninus, a member of the collegio tibicinum, or flute-players'
guild, at Rome.[13] Quintus Titucius Silvinus, buried at the site of modern
Cavillargues, formerly part of Aquitania.[14] Notes Perhaps his surname should be
"Reburrus". See also List of Roman gentes References Chronography of 354. AE 1972, 435.
Chase, pp. 155, 156.
CIL IX, 3951. CIL IX, 7686g. CIL X, 4917.
CIL IX, 7724. CIL IX,
3902. CIL IX, 4036. CIL VI, 21517. CIL, 2-5, 1288. PIR, vol. III, p. 330 (T, No. 209). CIL VI,
3877a. CIL XII, 2749. Bibliography
Chronography of 354. Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum
(The Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische
Akademie der Wissenschaften (1853–present). George Davis Chase, "The
Origin of Roman Praenomina", in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology,
vol. VIII, pp. 103–184 (1897). Paul von Rohden, Elimar Klebs, & Hermann
Dessau, Prosopographia Imperii Romani (The Prosopography of the Roman Empire,
abbreviated PIR), Berlin (1898). Category: Roman gentes And for THIS gens?
Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tituzio –
Ossia: Grice e Tituzio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tituzio For the Titucii, I
think the most Grice-Speranza-worthy figure is not the urban prefect Titucius
Roburrus, about whom we know almost nothing beyond his office, but rather: Marcus Tituccius Daphnus, who erected a tomb
for two slave-children of his household and recorded their ages with
astonishing precision: Lucana: nine
years, three months, thirteen days, and four hours. Macedo: five years, two
months, one day, and three hours. [GREXv3 | Word] What fascinates me is the inclusion of the
hours. Most epitaphs stop at years, perhaps months and days. But here the
age-recording approaches bureaucratic exactitude. A Gricean dialogue suggests
itself: (*) QVOT ANNORVM ERAT? (How old
was she?) DAPHNVS. Novem annorum. (Nine years old.) AMICVS. SATIS EST. (That is
enough.) DAPHNVS. Non mihi. (Not for me.) +> What counts as an adequate
degree of information depends upon the purposes and emotions of the
speaker. That is a very Gricean moral.
For an ordinary census: "nine years
old" would satisfy Quantity. For a
grieving guardian: "nine years,
three months, thirteen days, and four hours" is not excessive. The informational standard
has changed. A second candidate is
Marcus Tituccius Saturninus, a member of the guild of flute-players (collegium
tibicinum). The tibicen occupies the borderland between language and music that
we discussed with the Tigellii. [GREXv3 | Word] One could imagine: (*) PHILOSOPHVS. Quid significat? (What does
it mean?) TIBICEN. Non omnia significant. (Not everything signifies.) +>
Some communicative effects arise without propositional content. But my preferred Titucius remains Marcus
Tituccius Daphnus. Speranza's gloss The
Titucii contribute an epitaph that records not merely years but hours.
Philosophers of language ask how much information is enough. Daphnus' answer is
that adequacy is relative to interest. For the indifferent observer, "nine
years" suffices; for the bereaved, four additional hours still matter. [GREXv3 |
Word]
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tituleno – Ossia: Grice e
Tituleno – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tituleno -- The gens Titulena or
Titulenia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens are mentioned in Roman writers, but several are
known from inscriptions, of whom the most illustrious must have been Lucius
Titulenus, a second-century governor of Raetia.
Origin The nomen Titulenus belongs to a class of gentilicia formed from
the names of places or cognomina ending in -inus.[1] The root seems to be the
cognomen Titulus, a diminutive of the praenomen Titus. Names of this type were
common among gentes of Umbrian origin,[1] and several of the Tituleni were
natives of Fanum Fortunae in Umbria, or from neighboring towns from the same
region. Praenomina The Tituleni known
from epigraphy used several common praenomina, particularly Lucius, but also
Gaius, Marcus, Quintus, and Titus. One early inscription indicates that the
Tituleni also used the praenomen Vibius, which was uncommon at Rome, but more
widespread in the rest of Italy. Members
This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice,
see filiation. Titulenus V. f., named in an inscription from Reate in Samnium,
dating from 171 BC.[2] Titulenus, one of the quattuorvirs at Iguvium in Umbria,
at some point in the latter half of the first century BC.[3] Quintus Titulenus
Q. f. Major, dedicated a tomb at Camerinum in Umbria, dating between 30 BC and
the middle of the first century, for Vibia, perhaps his daughter, aged
twelve.[4] Titulena Galatia, built a first-century tomb at Rome for her son,
Marcus Titulenus Justus.[5] Marcus Titulenus Justus, a boy buried at Rome, aged
seven years, nine months, fifteen days, and eight hours, in a tomb built by his
mother, Titulena Galatia.[5] Titus Titulenus Isauricus, buried in a late
first-century tomb at Rome, dedicated by his wife, Julia Tyche.[6] Titulena
Justa, dedicated a second-century family sepulchre at Rome for herself and her
husband, Marcus Junius Dionysius, a physician.[7] Lucius Titulenus L. f.,
procurator, or governor of Raetia, probably during the reign of Antoninus Pius
or slightly earlier. An inscription from Fanum Fortunae in Umbria records his
military and political career: he had been one of the duumvirs, aedile,
quaestor, prefect of a cohort and of an Ala, and military tribune of a Roman
legion.[8] Titulenius Boniatus, made a donation to the cult of Vulcan at Celeia
in Noricum, dating between AD 195 and 205.[9] Lucius Titulenius L. f.
Respectus, a veteran of the Legio X Gemina, made an offering to Jupiter Optimus
Maximus at Burnum in Dalmatia, dating between the middle of the second century,
and the end of the third. He was buried at Tragurium, also in Dalmatia, in a
tomb built by his wife, Titia Myrsine.[10] Titulenia Justina, dedicated a
third-century tomb at Sorviodurum in Raetia for her husband, Julius Primitivus,
a former soldier, aged sixty.[11] Lucius Titulenus L. l. Tertius, a freedman,
was a native of Fanum Fortunae, and became one of the Seviri Augustales. He was
buried in a third-century tomb at Fanum Fortunae, along with a boy named Lucius
Titulenus Ursio, perhaps his son.[12] Lucius Titulenus Ursio, a boy buried in a
third-century tomb at Fanum Fortunae, aged twelve, together with Lucius
Titulenus Tertius, perhaps his father. The sepulchral inscription describes him
as the freedman of a woman named Titulena.[12] Undated Tituleni Gaius
Titulenius, buried at Rome.[13] Titulena T. f. Polla, the wife of Quintus
Vettesius Scaeva, and mother of Quintus Vettesius Quadratus, who built a family
sepulchre at Reate for himself, his parents, his sister, Vettesia Sabina, and
their freedmen and freedwomen.[14] See also List of Roman gentes References Chase, p. 118. CIL I, 2661. AE 1995, 470.
AE 1990, 324. CIL VI, 27538. CIL VI, 27537. CIL VI, 9585.
CIL XI, 6221. CIL
IV, 11699. CIL III, 2677, CIL III,
14982. CIL III, 5692. CIL XI, 6238. Opuscula Romana, 1961-183,13. CIL IX, 4654. Bibliography Theodor Mommsen et
alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (The Body of Latin Inscriptions,
abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften
(1853–present). René Cagnat et alii, L'Année épigraphique (The Year in
Epigraphy, abbreviated AE), Presses Universitaires de France (1888–present). George Davis Chase, "The Origin of Roman Praenomina", in
Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol. VIII, pp. 103–184 (1897). Opuscula
Romana: Annual of the Swedish Institute in Rome, (1954–2007). Category: Roman
gentes And for THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Tituleno
– Ossia: Grice e Tituleno – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Tituleno For the
Tituleni, there is an irresistible candidate for a Grice-Speranza note: Marcus Titulenus Justus, the boy whose
epitaph records his age as: seven years, nine months, fifteen days, and eight
hours. [GREXv3 | Word] You will notice
that this resembles the Tituccius Daphnus epitaph we discussed, where ages are
likewise given down to the hour. From a Gricean perspective, this immediately
raises a Quantity question: Why
"eight hours"?
Ordinarily, "He died at
seven" would suffice. Even "seven years and nine months" might seem enough. Yet the inscription
adds: fifteen days, eight hours. [GREXv3
| Word] The information is excessive
relative to ordinary practical purposes, but perfectly intelligible relative to
mourning. A Speranzian dialogue: (*)
AMICVS. Quot annorum erat? (How old was he?) MATER. Septem annorum. (Seven
years old.) AMICVS. Satis. (Enough.) MATER. Non mihi. (Not to me.) +>
Relevance is indexed to concern. A
bereaved parent counts differently from a census clerk. There is also a splendid onomastic joke in
the family itself. The name appears to derive from Titulus according to the
account you've supplied. [GREXv3 | Word] Now titulus in Latin can mean: an inscription, a label, a title. A philosopher of language can hardly resist.
We have: Titulus → Titulenus. One is tempted to ask: Is the Titulenus merely the bearer of a
titulus? A Gricean parody: (*) QVIS ES? (Who are you?) TITVLENVS.
(Titulenus.) +> The answer is itself a titulus. A second candidate is Lucius Titulenus,
governor (procurator) of Raetia, whose inscription records an impressively long
cursus from local magistracies through military commands to provincial office.
[GREXv3 | Word] But philosophically I still prefer little Marcus Titulenus
Justus. Speranza's gloss The Tituleni
contribute an epitaph whose precision descends to the hour. Philosophers
dispute how much information is enough. Mothers, apparently, have a different
standard. The additional eight hours say nothing useful to the state, but
everything important to the person who commissioned the inscription. [GREXv3 |
Word]
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titurio – Ossia: Grice e
Titurio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titurio. The gens
Tituria was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this
gens appear in history, of whom the most famous is Quintus Titurius Sabinus,
one of Caesar's legates during the Gallic Wars.[1] Other Titurii are known from
inscriptions. Origin The nomen Titurius
is listed by Chase among those gentilicia that either originated at Rome, or
cannot be shown to have come from anywhere else.[2] The surname Sabinus, borne
by several members of this family, suggests that they considered themselves the
descendants of the Sabines, an ancient people of central Italy,[3] many of whom
were said to have settled at Rome beginning in the time of Romulus.[4][5] Praenomina The main praenomina of the Titurii
were Lucius and Gaius, the two most common names at all periods of Roman
history. Other praenomina occurring in this gens include Titus, Quintus,
Marcus, and Decimus, of which only Decimus was relatively distinctive. The
filiation of one early member of this family indicates that they also used the
praenomen Vibius, which was decidedly uncommon at Rome. Members This list includes abbreviated
praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation. Lucius Titurius
L. f. Sabinus, one of the triumviri monetales at some point between about 89
and 84 BC. He might be the same person as the legate who brought fifteen
cohorts of Pompeius to their winter quarters in Celtiberia in 75 BC.[6][7]
Quintus Titurius Sabinus, one of Caesar's legates during the Gallic Wars. He
put down an uprising in 56 BC, but two years later was slain by Ambiorix, along
with Lucius Aurunculeius Cotta.[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Tituria Zosima,
buried at Brundisium in Calabria, aged forty-five, at some point between 20 BC
and AD 30.[16] Tituria Ɔ. l. Synetia, a freedwoman buried at Rome early in the
first century, along with the freedwoman Tituria Xyne and the freedman Quintus
Caesius Artemo.[17] Tituria Ɔ. l. Xyne, a freedwoman buried at Rome early in
the first century, along with the freedwoman Tituria Synetia and the freedman Quintus
Caesius Artemo.[17] Lucius Titurius V. f. Sabinus, named along with the
freedwoman Cornelia Chila in a sepulchral inscription from Rome, dating from
the first half of the first century.[18][19] Gaius Titurius Festus, a centurion
in the fourteenth cohort of the praetorian guard at Iuvavum in Noricum in AD
69.[20] Gaius Titurius C. l. Felix, a freedman, built a tomb at Casinum in
Latium, dating between the beginning of the first century and the middle of the
second, for the freedwoman Decitia Fortunata, and his former master, Gaius
Titurius Sabinus.[21] Gaius Titurius C. f. Sabinus, buried at Casinum, in a
tomb built by his freedman, Gaius Titurius Felix, dating between the beginning
of the first century and the middle of the second.[21] Tituria Ɔ. l. Chrysis, a
freedwoman, donated one pound, ten ounces of silver to Venus at Sentinum in
Umbria, at some point between the middle of the first century and the end of
the second.[22] Titus Titurius, named in an inscription from Vercellae in
Gallia Narbonensis, dating between the late first century and the middle of the
second.[23] Lucius Titurius Sabinus, dedicated a monument at Rome, dating from
the first half of the second century, for the family of Marcus Valerius
Dius.[24] Marcus Titurius C. f., a soldier in the third cohort of the Legio II
Traiana Fortis, dedicated a sepulchre at Alexandria, dating from between AD 120
and 150, for himself and his wife.[25] Gaius Titurius Valens, a native of
Patavium in Venetia and Histria, was a soldier in the century of Proculus, in
the sixth cohort of the praetorian guard, stationed at Rome between AD 135 and
137.[26] Lucius Titurius Maxurius, one of the magistri fontis at Rome in AD
140.[27] Gaius Titurius Secundus, a native of Vercellae, was a soldier in the
century of Proclus, in the fourteenth urban cohort. He was buried in a
second-century tomb at Rome, having served for seventeen years, with a monument
from his brother.[28] Titurius Proculus, a centurion in the Legio XXII
Primigenia, during the government of Marcus Bassaeus Astur in Arabia Petraea,
toward the end of the second century.[29][30] Tituria Veneria, buried at Cirta
in Numidia in the late second or early third century.[31] Titurius [...]ulanus,
named in a fourth-century sepulchral inscription from the site of modern
Ferentillo in Umbria.[32] Tituria Rufina, buried at Albulae in Mauretania
Caesariensis, aged about twenty-three, on the fourth day before the Nones of
October[i] in AD 499 or 500.[33] Undated Titurii Titurius, a potter whose
maker's mark was found at Aquileia in Venetia and Histria.[34] Titurius, a
potter whose maker's mark has been found on pottery from various sites in
Gallia Belgica.[35] Titurius, a potter whose maker's mark has been found on
pottery from Britannia.[36] Lucius Titurius, a potter whose maker's mark was
found on potter from Latium or Campania.[37] Titurius Festus, buried at
Madaurus in Africa Proconsularis, aged forty, along with a younger man named
Lucius Titurius Festus, and Titurius Maurus.[38] Lucius Titurius Festus, Madaurus,
aged twenty-one, along with an older Titurius Festus, and Titurius Maurus.[38]
Titus Titurius T. f. Mamercus, named in a sepulchral inscription from Rome,
along with Titus Titurius Sabinus and Tituria Sabina.[39] Titurius Maurus,
buried at Madaurus, along with Titurius Festus, and a younger man named Lucius
Titurius Festus.[38] Tituria Sabina, named in a sepulchral inscription from
Rome, along with Titus Titurius Mamercus and Titus Titurius Sabinus.[39]
Titurius Sabinus, a potter whose maker's mark was found on pottery from an
uncertain province.[40] Titus Titurius T. f. Sabinus, named in a sepulchral
inscription from Rome, along with Titus Titurius Mamercus and Tituria
Sabina.[39] Quintus Titurius Saturninus, buried at Mactaris in Africa
Proconsularis, aged eighty-five, with a monument from one of his children.[41]
Decimus Titurius Secundus, named in an inscription from Concordia in Venetia
and Histria.[42] Tituria Ser[...], a girl buried at Carmo in Hispania Baetica,
aged ten.[43] Lucius Titurius C. f. Sura, buried at Ateste in Venetia and
Histria, with a monument from the freedwoman Acutia Auga.[44] Tituria Tuenda,
dedicated a tomb at Aquileia for the freedman Quintus Cervius Treptus and
Quintus Cervius Pudens.[45] See also List of Roman gentes Notes October 4, by modern reckoning.
References Dictionary of Greek and Roman
Biography and Mythology, vol. III, p. 691 ("Q. Titurius Sabinus"). Chase, p. 132. Chase, p. 114. Livy, i. 13.
Dionysius, ii. 46. Sallust,
Historiae, ii. 94. Broughton, vol. II,
pp. 100, 454. Caesar, De Bello Gallico, ii. 5, 9, 10; iii. 11, 17–19, v. 24–37. Cassius Dio, xxxix. 45, xl. 5, 6. Suetonius,
"The Life of Caesar", 25.
Livy, Epitome, 106. Florus, iii.
10. Orosius, vi.
8. Eutropius, vi. 14. Broughton, vol. II, pp. 199, 205, 213, 219,
226. CIL IX, 6137. CIL VI, 13967. CIL VI, 27539. PIR, vol. III, p. 331 (T, No. 210). AE 1933, 128.
AE 2015, 304. AE 1941, 96. AE 1986, 262.
CIL VI, 27988. CIL III,
6611. CIL VI, 2375. CIL VI, 159. CIL VI, 39469. Inscriptions Grecques et Latines de la Syrie,
xiii. 1, 9081, 9082. AE 1920, 73. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 1,
1803. CIL XI, 4994. AE 1985, 979.
Pais, Supplementa Italica, 1080,434.
CAG, ii, p. 514; lix. 2, p. 277; lxii. 1, p. 104, 2,
p. 452. CIL VII, 1336,1134a, CIL VII,
1336,1134b. CIL X, 8056,357, CIL X, 8056,358c.
Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, i. 2708. CIL VI, 27540. AE 1995, 1820. CIL VIII, 11878. AE 2002, 541.
Hispania Epigraphica, 1997, 784.
CIL V, 2709. CIL V, 1153. Bibliography Gaius Julius Caesar, Commentarii de Bello
Gallico (Commentaries on the Gallic War). Gaius Sallustius Crispus (Sallust),
Historiae (The Histories). Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Romaike Archaiologia
(Roman Antiquities). Titus Livius (Livy), History of Rome. Gaius Suetonius
Tranquillus, De Vita Caesarum (Lives of the Caesars, or The Twelve Caesars).
Lucius Annaeus Florus, Epitome de T. Livio Bellorum Omnium Annorum DCC (Epitome
of Livy: All the Wars of Seven Hundred Years). Lucius Cassius Dio, Roman
History. Eutropius, Breviarium Historiae Romanae (Abridgement of the History of
Rome). Paulus Orosius, Historiarum Adversum Paganos (History Against the
Pagans). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, William Smith,
ed., Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1849). Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus
Inscriptionum Latinarum (The Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL),
Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften (1853–present). Ettore
Pais, Corporis Inscriptionum Latinarum Supplementa Italica (Italian Supplement
to the Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum), Rome (1884). René Cagnat et alii,
L'Année épigraphique (The Year in Epigraphy, abbreviated AE), Presses
Universitaires de France (1888–present). George Davis Chase, "The Origin
of Roman Praenomina", in Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, vol.
VIII, pp. 103–184 (1897). Paul von Rohden, Elimar Klebs, & Hermann Dessau,
Prosopographia Imperii Romani (The Prosopography of the Roman Empire,
abbreviated PIR), Berlin (1898). Stéphane Gsell,
Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie (Latin Inscriptions from Algeria), Edouard
Champion, Paris (1922–present). Inscriptions Grecques et Latines de la Syrie
(Greek and Latin Inscriptions of Syria), Paris (1929–present). La Carte
Archéologique de la Gaule (Archaeological Map of Gaul, abbreviated CAG),
Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres (1931–present). T. Robert S. Broughton, The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, American
Philological Association (1952–1986). Hispania Epigraphica (Epigraphy of
Spain), Madrid (1989–present). Category: Roman gentes And for THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titurio – Ossia: Grice e
Titurio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titurio. For the
Titurii, there is really no contest. The patron saint of a Gricean entry
is: Quintus Titurius Sabinus, Caesar's
legate in the Gallic War, famous for his dealings with Ambiorix and for the
disastrous destruction of his force together with Lucius Aurunculeius Cotta.
[GREXv3 | Word] Why is he so Gricean?
Because the whole episode in De Bello Gallico Book V is about trusting
testimony, interpreting advice, and reasoning from another person's utterances.
Ambiorix and the problem of belief In Caesar's narrative, Ambiorix approaches
the Roman commanders and presents himself as a benefactor. He warns them of
impending danger and advises them to leave their camp. Sabinus believes him;
Cotta does not. [GREXv3 | Word] The disagreement is not over facts directly
observed. It is over: whether a speaker
is to be trusted. A Gricean
reconstruction: AMBIORIX. I speak for
your benefit. COTTA. Why should I believe you? SABINUS. Why should he deceive
us? +> The acceptance of testimony depends not merely on what is said but on
assumptions concerning the speaker's intentions. That is extraordinarily close to Grice's
concern with communicative intention.
The fatal inference The tragedy is that Sabinus treats Ambiorix's
warning as reliable information. Cotta treats it as a hostile stratagem. One of
them is right. In modern philosophical terms, the issue is: When is an utterance evidence? Grice often emphasizes that understanding an
utterance requires assumptions about rational cooperation. The catastrophe at
the Titurian camp occurs because one party assumes cooperation where none
exists. Titinius and Titurius An amusing
contrast with the previous Titinius. The story of Titinius at Philippi
concerned a mistaken inference from an event:
"He has not returned."
Cassius infers defeat. The story of Titurius Sabinus concerns a mistaken
inference from an utterance:
"Ambiorix says we should leave." Sabinus infers goodwill. [GREXv3 | Word]
Thus: FigureSource of
errorTitiniusInterpretation of a factSabinusInterpretation of a speaker The
second is even more directly Gricean.
The runner-up A surprising alternative is the poet Titinius, the
earliest known composer of tabernariae. [GREXv3 | Word] Since comedy thrives
on: misunderstanding, double meanings,
concealed intentions, one could easily
make him the patron of conversational implicature. But historically Sabinus is
richer. Speranza's gloss The Titurii furnish Grice with a military
example of misplaced conversational confidence. Ambiorix speaks; Sabinus believes;
Cotta doubts. The issue is not grammar, logic, or vocabulary. It is whether one
is entitled to assume that the speaker's apparent benevolence corresponds to
his actual intentions. The answer, unfortunately for Sabinus, was no. [GREXv3 |
Word] Well, Grice with a pinch of sale. Homo hominis lupus, Hobbes. War is war.
Grice seems to be saying that the principle of conversational helpfulness
operates among a decent chap and another decent chap, in normal circumstances. Not
other. Thanks Quite. In fact, I think one must be careful not to
"over-Griceanize" poor Sabinus. Grice's Cooperative Principle was
never intended as a sociological law:
"All human beings are always cooperative." Nor even:
"Enemies cooperate conversationally." Rather, it is a rational principle governing
the interpretation of discourse when one is entitled to treat the exchange as a
cooperative enterprise. The famous formulation speaks of contribution to a
conversation in accordance with its accepted purpose or direction. The crucial
word is: accepted. That is precisely what is missing between
Ambiorix and Sabinus. [GREXv3 | Word] A Hobbesian would say: homo homini lupus. A Roman commander in enemy territory would be
wise to agree. So Cotta's position is actually rather un-Gricean only in
appearance. He is effectively saying:
"Why assume cooperative purposes here?" And that is a perfectly Gricean question. The
error is not failure to apply the Cooperative Principle. The error is perhaps
applying it where its preconditions are absent. One might say: SituationGricean
assumptionFriendly conversationReasonableLegal negotiationOften
reasonableDiplomatic parleySometimes reasonableEnemy commander in wartimePotentially
hazardous Which is why Grice always stresses intentions and purposes rather
than blind trust. Indeed, a nice Oxonian refinement would be: The Cooperative Principle is not a principle
of morality. It is a principle of interpretation. Ambiorix may be lying. The question is
whether Sabinus is justified in interpreting him as if he were not. A Hobbesian
and a Griceian can therefore agree perfectly well: War is war.
The Hobbesian adds: Therefore
trust nobody. The Griceian adds: Therefore do not assume a common
conversational enterprise unless there is evidence for one. In that sense, Cotta may be the more Gricean
of the two commanders. Speranza might put it:
Sabinus assumes cooperation; Cotta questions the assumption. Grice's
principle tells us what follows if an accepted conversational purpose exists.
It does not guarantee that Ambiorix has accepted it. That is a military problem
rather than a semantic one. And add to that that Amb. possibly needed a 'legatus' or interpreter
since Brythionic -- or old Gallic -- is not something Cotta speaks, nor Latin
is something Amb. does -- Do we know the Latin for the report? Thanks Yes, and
this is precisely where the historical reality may be less Gricean and more
anthropological. We should remember that Ambiorix was an Eburonian chieftain in
Belgic Gaul, while Sabinus and Cotta were Roman officers. Whether Ambiorix
spoke fluent Latin is not something Caesar explicitly tells us in the passages
I have found. I have not found a source stating whether an interpreter was
used. So we should be cautious. Caesar certainly records long speeches, but
that does not prove direct linguistic communication; ancient historians
routinely present speeches in polished literary Latin regardless of the
language actually spoken. [thelatinlibrary.com], [profcurious.com] What we do
have is Caesar's account of the Roman reaction. After the council of war,
Caesar writes: ut quibus esset persuasum
non ab hoste, sed ab homine amicissimo Ambiorige consilium datum "as
though they had been persuaded that the advice had been given not by an enemy
but by the most friendly Ambiorix." [novalatin.weebly.com], [discoverlatin.com] That sentence is devastatingly ironic. The
key phrase is: non ab hoste, sed ab
homine amicissimo Ambiorige "not by an enemy, but by the very friendly
Ambiorix." [novalatin.weebly.com], [discoverlatin.com] Caesar is practically saying: "They behaved as if Ambiorix were their
best friend." From a Gricean
standpoint, Sabinus' mistake is not really a linguistic one. It is not a
misunderstanding of Latin. It is a mistaken attribution of intentions. He
effectively assumes: Ambiorix is giving
information for our benefit. Whereas
Cotta assumes: Ambiorix is an enemy and
therefore his advice should be treated as strategically interested. So I think your earlier Hobbesian
qualification is exactly right. The issue is not: "How shall I interpret this utterance
given that we are engaged in a cooperative exchange?" but rather:
"Are we engaged in a cooperative exchange at all?" That is logically prior to Grice's
Cooperative Principle. A nice Speranzian formula might be: Grice begins with conversation among decent
chaps. Ambiorix and Sabinus begin with war. Before one can infer an
implicature, one must first determine whether the speaker is a conversational
partner or an enemy commander. Caesar's point is that Sabinus got that
preliminary question wrong. [novalatin.weebly.com],
[discoverlatin.com]
Speranza, J. L. (n. d.). ‘H. P.
Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titurnio – Ossia: Grice e
Titurnio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titurnio -- The gens Titurnia was an
obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of
this gens are mentioned in history, but others are known from
inscriptions.[1] Praenomina The main
praenomina of the Titurnii were Gaius, Marcus, and Lucius, the three most
common names at all periods of Roman history. Other praenomina found in this
family include Quintus, Titus, and Decimus, of which Quintus and Titus were
common, while Decimus was more distinctive.
Branches and cognomina Several of the earlier Titurnii came from towns
in Venetia and Histria, but the great majority of inscriptions from this family
show that they settled in Roman Africa at an early date, prospering there until
at least the second or third century.
Members This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of
this practice, see filiation. Marcus Titurnius Rufus, the last member of a
family with whom Cicero had long been warmly acquainted. In 46 BC, the orator
earnestly recommended him to Manius Acilius Glabrio.[2][1] Marcus Titurnius M.
f. Africanus, in 2 BC rebuilt the temple of Tellus at Vaga in Africa
Proconsularis.[3] Gaius Titurnius C. l. Florus, a freedman who dedicated a tomb
at Altinum in Venetia and Histria during the first half of the first century
for his patron, the freedman Gaius Titurnius Gratus.[4] Gaius Titurnius C. l.
Gratus, a freedman buried at Altinum during the first half of the first
century, with a monument from his client, the freedman Gaius Titurnius
Florus.[4] Gaius Titurnius C. l. Senecio, a freedman buried at Aquileia in
Venetia and Histria during the latter half of the first century, in a sepulchre
built by the freedman Jucundus.[5] Gaius Titinius Quartio, an eques in the
Legio III Gallica, probably during Trajan's Parthian campaign of AD 115, since
his inscription mentions trophies won at Seleucia and Babylon. After serving
for thirty-five years, Quartio was buried at the site of modern Naimine er
Rodoui, formerly part of Africa Proconsularis.[6] Titurnia Extricoi, buried in
a second-century tomb at Castellum Celtianum in Numidia, aged eighty.[7]
Titurnia Januaria, buried in a second-century tomb at Castellum Celtianum, aged
forty-five.[8] Titurnia Rogata, buried in a second-century tomb at Castellum
Celtianum, aged forty.[9] Titurnia Silvana, buried in a second-century tomb at
Castellum Celtianum, aged ninety-five.[10] Titurnius Postumus, the former
master of Titurnia Artemonis, who made a second- or third-century offering in
his honour to Diana at Segobriga in Hispania Citerior.[11] Titurnia Artemonis,
a freedwoman, made an offering to Diana at Segobriga, dating between the
beginning of the second and the late third century, in honour of Titurnius
Postumus, her former master.[11] Titurnius Rogatus, a soldier in the first
cohort of the vigiles at Rome in AD 205. He served in the century of
Victor.[12] Titurnia, buried in a second- or third-century tomb at Castellum
Celtianum.[13] Gaius Titurnius Villanus, buried in a second- or third-century
tomb at Castellum Celtianum, aged forty-one.[14] Undated Titurnii Titurnia,
buried at Lambaesis in Numidia, aged sixty, with a monument from her husband,
Gaius Sextius Bassus.[15] Titurnius, made an offering to Saturn at Calama in
Africa Proconsularis.[16] Titurnius, dedicated a tomb at Ammaedara in Africa
Proconsularis for his father, Gaius Titurnius Felix.[17] Decimus Titurnius D.
T. l. Diphilus, a freedman named in an inscription from Tarraco in Hispania
Citerior.[18] Titurnia Fausta, buried at the site of modern Ouled Sellam,
formerly part of Africa Proconsularis, aged thirty.[19] Gaius Titurnius C. f.
Felix, buried at Ammaedara in Africa Proconsularis, aged sixty-two, with a
monument from his son, Titurnius.[17] Lucius Titurnius L. f. Felix, buried at
Uchi Maius in Africa Proconsularis, aged sixty-five.[20] Quintus Titurnius
Fortunatus, named in an inscription from the site of modern Chettaba, formerly
part of Numidia.[21] Lucius Titurnius Januarius, buried at Civitas Popthensis
in Numidia, aged forty-one.[22] Titurnia Maximina, wife of the priest Gaius
Terebellius Paternus, with whom she made an offering at Cuicul in Numidia in
honour of their children, Terebellius Nestor and Grania.[23] Titurnia Marcia,
buried at Respublica Vahartanensium in Mauretania Caesariensis, aged sixty.[24]
Titurnia Monula, buried at Castellum Phuensium in Numidia. The portion of the
inscription giving her age is damaged, but she was at least twenty.[25]
Titurnia Nina, buried at Vasampus in Africa Proconsularis, aged one hundred and
fifteen, with a monument from her son, Rogatus Felix Messor.[26] Titurnia L. f.
Quintilla, buried at Milevum in Numidia, aged twenty-five.[27] Titurnia Rogata,
a young woman buried at Castellum Celtianum, aged eighteen.[28] Quintus
Titurnius Saturninus, made an offering at Thignica in Africa Proconsularis.[29]
Gaius Titurnius Verus, dedicated a tomb at Aquileia for the freedwoman Vettia
Sabina, aged twenty-six, perhaps his mother.[30] Titurnius Vitalis, buried at
Zugal in Numidia, aged eighty.[31] See also List of Roman gentes
References Dictionary of Greek and Roman
Biography and Mythology, vol. III, p. 1159 ("M. Titurnius
Rufus"). Cicero, Ad Familiares,
xiii. 39. CIL VIII, 14392. CIL V, 2272. CIL V, 1415.
AE 1913, 48. Inscriptions Latines
de L'Algérie, ii. 1, 3338. Inscriptions
Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 1, 3339.
Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 1, 3340. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 1,
3342. CIL II, 3093b. CIL VI, 1056.
Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 1, 3337. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 1,
3336. CIL VIII, 18463. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, i.
3995. AE 2011, 1649. CIL II, 6135.
Inscriptions Latines de La Tunisie, 1234. AE 2006, 1728. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 3,
8969. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie,
i. 1166. Inscriptions Latines de
L'Algérie, ii. 3, 7737. AE 1992,
1900. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie,
ii. 3, 9601. AE 2003, 1981. CIL VIII, 20064. Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 1,
3341. Epigraphica, 2021–192. CIL V, 1449.
Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie, ii. 3, 8430. Bibliography Marcus
Tullius Cicero, Epistulae ad Familiares. Dictionary of
Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology, William Smith, ed., Little, Brown and
Company, Boston (1849). Theodor Mommsen et alii, Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum
(The Body of Latin Inscriptions, abbreviated CIL), Berlin-Brandenburgische
Akademie der Wissenschaften (1853–present). René Cagnat et alii, L'Année épigraphique (The Year in Epigraphy,
abbreviated AE), Presses Universitaires de France (1888–present). Stéphane
Gsell, Inscriptions Latines de L'Algérie (Latin Inscriptions from Algeria),
Edouard Champion, Paris (1922–present). Epigraphica, Rivista Italiana di
Epigrafia (1939–present). Alfred Merlin, Inscriptions Latines de La Tunisie
(Latin Inscriptions from Tunisia), Fondation Dourlans, Paris (1944). Category: Roman gentes And for THIS gens? Thanks
Speranza, J. L.
(n. d.). ‘H. P. Grice e J. L. Speranza: La Conversazione – I Verbali: Titurnio
– Ossia: Grice e Titurnio – Grex griceiana – verbalia: Titurnio For the
Titurnii, I think the most Gricean figure is not the governor or the soldier,
but the one person for whom we glimpse an actual social relation: Marcus Titurnius Rufus, whom Cicero warmly
recommends to Manius Acilius Glabrio in a letter of 46 BC. [GREXv3 | Word] Why? Because a letter of recommendation is
one of the most interesting speech acts in antiquity. The writer is not merely
stating facts. He is doing something by saying them. Cicero's point is
not: "Rufus exists." but:
"You should treat Rufus favorably." The recommendation carries both explicit
content and a social force. A Grice-Speranza vignette: (*) CICERO. Vir bonus est. (He is a good
man.) GLABRIO. Quid vis ut faciam? (What do you want me to do?) CICERO.
Intellegis. (You understand.) +> The practical point of a recommendation
commonly exceeds its literal wording.
This is very close to what Grice would later call the difference between
what is said and what is conveyed. An
African Titurnia A second irresistible figure is: Titurnia Nina, whose inscription gives her
age as 115 years. [GREXv3 | Word]
Whether or not modern demographers would believe the number, the
inscription raises a fascinating issue:
Why record age at all? An epitaph
is already identifying the deceased. The age is additional information. It
helps construct a life-story in miniature. A Gricean could say: (*) Quot annorum fuit? (How old was she?)
RESPONSUM. Centum quindecim. (One hundred and fifteen.) +> Numerical
precision can serve commemorative as well as informational purposes. The best cognomen Among the names, I am also
attracted to: Gaius Titurnius Gratus and
his freedman Gaius Titurnius Florus. [GREXv3 | Word] Gratus means:
pleasing, welcome, grateful. One
immediately recalls your earlier discussions of: charis, please, s'il vous plaît, and the whole Gricean territory of
interpersonal acknowledgment. Speranza's
gloss The Titurnii contribute not a
famous statesman but a recommendation. Cicero's praise of Marcus Titurnius
Rufus is valuable because recommendations operate largely through what they
invite rather than what they explicitly command. They are exercises in
civilized implication. A decent chap writes to another decent chap; the rest is
left to understanding. [GREXv3 | Word] In fact, Grice's first example of
implication is _him_ saying of Jones, "He has beautiful handwriting"
at Oxford collections -- Jones being Grice's tutee. He repeats the example but
in the third person (without the incorrigibility and privileged access of the
first person): he quotes a tutor referring to his tutee as "his attendance
to tutorials has been regular." -- Do we have the Latin for Tullio's piece
-- and to what 'office' was our 'hero' 'recommended'? Thanks
Yes, and in this case we are unusually
fortunate, because the letter is very short and the Latin survives. The
reference is: Cicero, Epistulae ad
Familiares 13.39, addressed to Manius Acilius Glabrio, then proconsul.
[texts.alpheios.net], [romanletters.org]
The Latin text runs: Cum familia
Titurnia necessitudo mihi intercedit vetus; ex qua reliquus est M. Titurnius
Rufus, qui mihi omni diligentia atque officio est tuendus. Est igitur
in tua potestate ut ille in me satis sibi praesidi putet esse. Quapropter eum
tibi commendo in maiorem modum et abs te peto efficias ut is commendationem
hanc intellegat sibi magno adiumento fuisse. Erit id mihi
vehementer gratum. [texts.alpheios.net]
A fairly literal rendering would be:
"I have an old connection with the Titurnii; of that family the
sole survivor is Marcus Titurnius Rufus, whom I am bound to protect with every
care and devotion. It therefore lies in your power to make him think that he
has sufficient support in me. Accordingly I recommend him to you most strongly
and ask that you make this recommendation of real assistance to him. I shall be
extremely grateful." [texts.alpheios.net]
Now comes the important Gricean point. To what office was Rufus being
recommended? The sources I found do not specify any office. Cicero merely
recommends Marcus Titurnius Rufus to Manius Acilius Glabrio.
[romanletters.org], [texts.alpheios.net] Indeed, the language is notably vague.
Cicero does not say: "Give him post
X." Nor: "Make him quaestor." Nor:
"Appoint him to office Y."
Instead he says: eum tibi
commendo ("I recommend him to you") [texts.alpheios.net] and
efficias ut ... sibi magno adiumento fuisse ("make this
recommendation a great help to him"). [texts.alpheios.net] That vagueness is precisely what would
interest Grice. The explicit content is:
"I recommend Rufus."
The practical import is:
"Please do something beneficial for Rufus." But Cicero leaves the exact action
unspecified. Rather like Grice's Oxford tutor saying: "His attendance at tutorials has been
regular." The sentence does not
literally say: "He is
intellectually weak." Yet that may
be what is conveyed. Similarly, Cicero does not literally say: "Advance Rufus' career." Yet that is very plausibly what Glabrio is
expected to infer. A Speranzian gloss might be:
The recommendation works because its force exceeds its wording. Cicero
does not instruct Glabrio what favour to perform. He merely recommends Rufus
and relies on Glabrio to determine what conduct would appropriately honour the
recommendation. The speech act is therefore underdetermined lexically and completed
pragmatically. [texts.alpheios.net] And can we parse the Latin more carefully
-- Tullio seems repetitive -- I recommend him and make this recommendation be
notified to him that I'm recommending -- there's something self-referential --
and no reason behind the recommendation -- or what purpose of a recommendation.
Grice, for example, distrusted letters of recommendation -- or of
NON-recommendation. When his office as fellow and tutor at St. John's, the
governing body was informed, 'He does not return library books' at his previous
positions qua scholar -- this is the anti-recommendation -- and usually by
backchannels -- Richardson reports it in his obituary for Grice in St. John's
College Records. Thanks Yes. The letter is interesting precisely because,
viewed pragmatically, it is rather thin. Cicero gives remarkably little content
and a great deal of force. The text again:
Cum familia Titurnia necessitudo mihi intercedit vetus; ex qua reliquus
est M. Titurnius Rufus, qui mihi omni diligentia atque officio est tuendus. Est igitur
in tua potestate ut ille in me satis sibi praesidi putet esse. Quapropter eum
tibi commendo in maiorem modum et abs te peto efficias ut is commendationem
hanc intellegat sibi magno adiumento fuisse. Erit id mihi
vehementer gratum. [texts.alpheios.net]
Let's unpack it. First sentence
Cum familia Titurnia necessitudo mihi intercedit vetus Literally:
"There exists between me and the Titurnian family an old
connection." Already this is a
justification, but a very Roman one. Not:
"Rufus is brilliant."
Not: "Rufus is
honest." Not: "Rufus deserves advancement." Instead:
"I have an old tie to the family." The recommendation is grounded in amicitia
and necessitudo, not merit. Then: ex qua
reliquus est M. Titurnius Rufus
"of that family Marcus Titurnius Rufus is the survivor
remaining." Then: qui mihi omni diligentia atque officio est
tuendus "whom I must protect with
every care and devotion." Notice
the passivity. Cicero does not explain why Rufus deserves protection. The
obligation arises from the prior connection.
Second sentence Est igitur in tua
potestate "It is therefore in your
power..." Then: ut ille in me satis sibi praesidi putet
esse. Almost: "that he may think he has enough support
in me." This is the curious part.
Cicero's aim is not merely: Help Rufus. His aim is:
Make Rufus aware that Cicero's recommendation has practical effect. The appearance of influence matters. Third sentence This is where the
self-reference appears. eum tibi
commendo "I recommend him to
you." Then: efficias ut is commendationem hanc intellegat
sibi magno adiumento fuisse "bring
it about that he understands that this recommendation has been of great
assistance to him." The structure
is almost reflexive: I recommend him.
You help him. He recognizes that my recommendation helped him. The recommendation recommends itself. In
modern bureaucratic English:
"Please help the candidate, and please make it clear that my letter
mattered." A Gricean reading This
is exactly the sort of document that would make Grice suspicious. The explicit
content is tiny: old family connection,
please help Rufus. The omitted content
is enormous: What help? For what purpose?
Why does Rufus deserve it? What office is sought? None of this is stated. [texts.alpheios.net]
A modern referee might write: "His
attendance has been regular." The
implicature may be devastating. Cicero, by contrast, gives almost no evaluative
information at all. The recommendation functions socially rather than
evidentially. It is less: "He is
qualified." than: "He is my man." Grice and the anti-recommendation Your St
John's example is actually illuminating.
"He does not return library books." That is almost the mirror image of Cicero's
letter. The anti-recommendation gives:
one apparently trivial fact,
while inviting enormous conclusions. Cicero does the opposite: offers virtually no facts, supplies only
patronage. The hearer must infer: "If Cicero writes this warmly, I ought
to do something." The
recommendation's force lies mostly outside its literal content. A Speranzian
gloss might be: The remarkable feature
of Cicero's letter is that it contains hardly any recommendation in the modern
sense. There is no testimonial, no evidence, no character analysis. Instead,
Cicero invokes an old connection and asks that the recommendation itself be
made efficacious. The letter exemplifies not the conveyance of information but
the activation of a social network. Grice would have noticed that most of the
work is being done by what is left unsaid. [texts.alpheios.net]


No comments:
Post a Comment