These are cases in which my lower nature interferes; inclinations, or some other disturbing factors, stop me from judging or willing that p, but do not stop me from willing that I will or judge that p, a higher-orderstate which may or may not in the end win out. Such cases of incipient incontinence of will or judgement are endemic to the constitution of a rational being. It seems to me, then, that the "B' cases should be allowed. Since, however, my present prime concern is with acceptability rather than with acceptance, and since it seems that what would justify accepting F, P (or !, p) would also justify accepting Fe P (or ½ P), and, again, vice versa, I think we can, within the scope of "it is acceptable that", safely omit the subscripts,